<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How To Use Search Marketing To Lift Your Brand</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.socialmediaexplorer.com/2008/07/30/brand-lift-of-search-marketing-google-reaction-summit-08/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.socialmediaexplorer.com/search-engine-marketing/brand-lift-of-search-marketing-google-reaction-summit-08/</link>
	<description>Social Media Consulting, Public Speaking and Education</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 03:51:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan DeShazer</title>
		<link>http://www.socialmediaexplorer.com/search-engine-marketing/brand-lift-of-search-marketing-google-reaction-summit-08/comment-page-1/#comment-33731</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan DeShazer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 21:27:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socialmediaexplorer.com/?p=454#comment-33731</guid>
		<description>Hey Kat, thanks for the note. I likewise hope all&#039;s well for you. I&#039;ve talked you up quite a bit to Jason. Not that you need any help from me. ;)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Steve, I certainly appreciate your thoughts. I think what Jason is referring to are the top 1-3 paid listings which sometimes appear above the organic results. Google is constantly split-testing its own results pages in an attempt to maximize its page-by-page monetization. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Read the Enquiro piece I reference. It demonstrates that top paid placement, in addition to your top organic placement, will lift your conversion rates greater than the sum of the parts. Could be an interesting tactic for you to test out.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Ryan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Kat, thanks for the note. I likewise hope all&#39;s well for you. I&#39;ve talked you up quite a bit to Jason. Not that you need any help from me. <img src='http://www.socialmediaexplorer.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Steve, I certainly appreciate your thoughts. I think what Jason is referring to are the top 1-3 paid listings which sometimes appear above the organic results. Google is constantly split-testing its own results pages in an attempt to maximize its page-by-page monetization. </p>
<p>Read the Enquiro piece I reference. It demonstrates that top paid placement, in addition to your top organic placement, will lift your conversion rates greater than the sum of the parts. Could be an interesting tactic for you to test out.</p>
<p>Ryan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KatFrench</title>
		<link>http://www.socialmediaexplorer.com/search-engine-marketing/brand-lift-of-search-marketing-google-reaction-summit-08/comment-page-1/#comment-33732</link>
		<dc:creator>KatFrench</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 21:25:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socialmediaexplorer.com/?p=454#comment-33732</guid>
		<description>As of 2005, according to Consumer Reports, 60% of web users were unaware of the distinction between paid and organic results.  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.webpronews.com/insiderreports/2005/04/29/consumer-reports-webwatch-search-engines-need-a-good-mechanic&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.webpronews.com/insiderreports/2005/0...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That number has probably dropped somewhat in the last three years, but it still indicates a substantial number of searchers who don&#039;t distinguish between the two.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As of 2005, according to Consumer Reports, 60% of web users were unaware of the distinction between paid and organic results.  <a href="http://www.webpronews.com/insiderreports/2005/04/29/consumer-reports-webwatch-search-engines-need-a-good-mechanic" rel="nofollow">http://www.webpronews.com/insiderreports/2005/0&#8230;</a></p>
<p>That number has probably dropped somewhat in the last three years, but it still indicates a substantial number of searchers who don&#39;t distinguish between the two.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JasonFalls</title>
		<link>http://www.socialmediaexplorer.com/search-engine-marketing/brand-lift-of-search-marketing-google-reaction-summit-08/comment-page-1/#comment-33733</link>
		<dc:creator>JasonFalls</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 21:09:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socialmediaexplorer.com/?p=454#comment-33733</guid>
		<description>Not at all, Steve. I&#039;m talking about the highlighted sponsored links placed atop the organic results. The average person doesn&#039;t delineate between the two.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not at all, Steve. I&#39;m talking about the highlighted sponsored links placed atop the organic results. The average person doesn&#39;t delineate between the two.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Magruder</title>
		<link>http://www.socialmediaexplorer.com/search-engine-marketing/brand-lift-of-search-marketing-google-reaction-summit-08/comment-page-1/#comment-33734</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Magruder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 20:54:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socialmediaexplorer.com/?p=454#comment-33734</guid>
		<description>If Google is putting paid results into their supposed organic results, that&#039;s news on me.  But I guess I also wouldn&#039;t be surprised.  I run sites that have #1 search hits based on particular sets of keywords, so that would be why I haven&#039;t noticed that any top results hadn&#039;t earned their position.  Google hasn&#039;t received one nickel from me to achieve these positions.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I also think people are smarter than are given credit for.  The organic results on Google are far more prominent than paid ones, and the paid ones have a clear heading &quot;Sponsored Links&quot;.  I would think that natural human behavior would lean one to choose what is more in front and isn&#039;t obviously paid for.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Google is putting paid results into their supposed organic results, that&#39;s news on me.  But I guess I also wouldn&#39;t be surprised.  I run sites that have #1 search hits based on particular sets of keywords, so that would be why I haven&#39;t noticed that any top results hadn&#39;t earned their position.  Google hasn&#39;t received one nickel from me to achieve these positions.</p>
<p>I also think people are smarter than are given credit for.  The organic results on Google are far more prominent than paid ones, and the paid ones have a clear heading &#8220;Sponsored Links&#8221;.  I would think that natural human behavior would lean one to choose what is more in front and isn&#39;t obviously paid for.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JasonFalls</title>
		<link>http://www.socialmediaexplorer.com/search-engine-marketing/brand-lift-of-search-marketing-google-reaction-summit-08/comment-page-1/#comment-33736</link>
		<dc:creator>JasonFalls</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 20:28:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socialmediaexplorer.com/?p=454#comment-33736</guid>
		<description>I would disagree to an extent, Steve. Most people who understand or are intuitive about the web trust organic more, but (and I&#039;m hoping someone can back me up with stats, here) most people are ignorant to the fact that the top entry is often paid. I could be wrong, but the vast majority of the world is outside the bubble and doesn&#039;t comprehend the web the way we do. This is exactly why that real estate costs what it does. My mother-in-law clicks the top one, regardless.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But you are right, highest organic result is much more credible and should be the goal of each search marketing program.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would disagree to an extent, Steve. Most people who understand or are intuitive about the web trust organic more, but (and I&#39;m hoping someone can back me up with stats, here) most people are ignorant to the fact that the top entry is often paid. I could be wrong, but the vast majority of the world is outside the bubble and doesn&#39;t comprehend the web the way we do. This is exactly why that real estate costs what it does. My mother-in-law clicks the top one, regardless.</p>
<p>But you are right, highest organic result is much more credible and should be the goal of each search marketing program.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Magruder</title>
		<link>http://www.socialmediaexplorer.com/search-engine-marketing/brand-lift-of-search-marketing-google-reaction-summit-08/comment-page-1/#comment-33735</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Magruder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 19:26:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socialmediaexplorer.com/?p=454#comment-33735</guid>
		<description>It should be pointed out that people think _more_ highly of top organic results than top paid search listings.  I think I&#039;m playing Captain Obvious here.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Good organic result positions, well at least on Google, are earned through having &quot;sweet spot&quot; (somewhere between generic/mundane and terribly obtuse) content, along with a good reputation, as determined by other sites linking to yours.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And this speaks to good marketing in general, which indeed equals &quot;sweet spot&quot; + reputation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It should be pointed out that people think _more_ highly of top organic results than top paid search listings.  I think I&#39;m playing Captain Obvious here.</p>
<p>Good organic result positions, well at least on Google, are earned through having &#8220;sweet spot&#8221; (somewhere between generic/mundane and terribly obtuse) content, along with a good reputation, as determined by other sites linking to yours.</p>
<p>And this speaks to good marketing in general, which indeed equals &#8220;sweet spot&#8221; + reputation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KatFrench</title>
		<link>http://www.socialmediaexplorer.com/search-engine-marketing/brand-lift-of-search-marketing-google-reaction-summit-08/comment-page-1/#comment-33737</link>
		<dc:creator>KatFrench</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 19:06:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socialmediaexplorer.com/?p=454#comment-33737</guid>
		<description>Nice post, Ryan.  I&#039;d been wondering what you&#039;ve been up to (beyond the whole &quot;not sleeping because of a new baby&quot; thing that both you and Jason have going on this year.) &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks for coming by and previewing your insights on B2B branding and SEM.  Paid search is still viewed a little askance by traditional advertising folks, but more and more they&#039;re catching on that it&#039;s definitely not going anywhere and that there really is value, if it&#039;s well done.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice post, Ryan.  I&#39;d been wondering what you&#39;ve been up to (beyond the whole &#8220;not sleeping because of a new baby&#8221; thing that both you and Jason have going on this year.) </p>
<p>Thanks for coming by and previewing your insights on B2B branding and SEM.  Paid search is still viewed a little askance by traditional advertising folks, but more and more they&#39;re catching on that it&#39;s definitely not going anywhere and that there really is value, if it&#39;s well done.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan DeShazer</title>
		<link>http://www.socialmediaexplorer.com/search-engine-marketing/brand-lift-of-search-marketing-google-reaction-summit-08/comment-page-1/#comment-3869</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan DeShazer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 14:27:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socialmediaexplorer.com/?p=454#comment-3869</guid>
		<description>Hey Kat, thanks for the note. I likewise hope all&#039;s well for you. I&#039;ve talked you up quite a bit to Jason. Not that you need any help from me. ;)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Steve, I certainly appreciate your thoughts. I think what Jason is referring to are the top 1-3 paid listings which sometimes appear above the organic results. Google is constantly split-testing its own results pages in an attempt to maximize its page-by-page monetization. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Read the Enquiro piece I reference. It demonstrates that top paid placement, in addition to your top organic placement, will lift your conversion rates greater than the sum of the parts. Could be an interesting tactic for you to test out.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Ryan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Kat, thanks for the note. I likewise hope all&#39;s well for you. I&#39;ve talked you up quite a bit to Jason. Not that you need any help from me. <img src='http://www.socialmediaexplorer.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Steve, I certainly appreciate your thoughts. I think what Jason is referring to are the top 1-3 paid listings which sometimes appear above the organic results. Google is constantly split-testing its own results pages in an attempt to maximize its page-by-page monetization. </p>
<p>Read the Enquiro piece I reference. It demonstrates that top paid placement, in addition to your top organic placement, will lift your conversion rates greater than the sum of the parts. Could be an interesting tactic for you to test out.</p>
<p>Ryan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KatFrench</title>
		<link>http://www.socialmediaexplorer.com/search-engine-marketing/brand-lift-of-search-marketing-google-reaction-summit-08/comment-page-1/#comment-3868</link>
		<dc:creator>KatFrench</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 14:25:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socialmediaexplorer.com/?p=454#comment-3868</guid>
		<description>As of 2005, according to Consumer Reports, 60% of web users were unaware of the distinction between paid and organic results.  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.webpronews.com/insiderreports/2005/04/29/consumer-reports-webwatch-search-engines-need-a-good-mechanic&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.webpronews.com/insiderreports/2005/0...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That number has probably dropped somewhat in the last three years, but it still indicates a substantial number of searchers who don&#039;t distinguish between the two.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As of 2005, according to Consumer Reports, 60% of web users were unaware of the distinction between paid and organic results.  <a href="http://www.webpronews.com/insiderreports/2005/04/29/consumer-reports-webwatch-search-engines-need-a-good-mechanic" rel="nofollow">http://www.webpronews.com/insiderreports/2005/0&#8230;</a></p>
<p>That number has probably dropped somewhat in the last three years, but it still indicates a substantial number of searchers who don&#39;t distinguish between the two.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JasonFalls</title>
		<link>http://www.socialmediaexplorer.com/search-engine-marketing/brand-lift-of-search-marketing-google-reaction-summit-08/comment-page-1/#comment-3867</link>
		<dc:creator>JasonFalls</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 14:09:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socialmediaexplorer.com/?p=454#comment-3867</guid>
		<description>Not at all, Steve. I&#039;m talking about the highlighted sponsored links placed atop the organic results. The average person doesn&#039;t delineate between the two.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not at all, Steve. I&#39;m talking about the highlighted sponsored links placed atop the organic results. The average person doesn&#39;t delineate between the two.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Magruder</title>
		<link>http://www.socialmediaexplorer.com/search-engine-marketing/brand-lift-of-search-marketing-google-reaction-summit-08/comment-page-1/#comment-3866</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Magruder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 13:54:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socialmediaexplorer.com/?p=454#comment-3866</guid>
		<description>If Google is putting paid results into their supposed organic results, that&#039;s news on me.  But I guess I also wouldn&#039;t be surprised.  I run sites that have #1 search hits based on particular sets of keywords, so that would be why I haven&#039;t noticed that any top results hadn&#039;t earned their position.  Google hasn&#039;t received one nickel from me to achieve these positions.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I also think people are smarter than are given credit for.  The organic results on Google are far more prominent than paid ones, and the paid ones have a clear heading &quot;Sponsored Links&quot;.  I would think that natural human behavior would lean one to choose what is more in front and isn&#039;t obviously paid for.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Google is putting paid results into their supposed organic results, that&#39;s news on me.  But I guess I also wouldn&#39;t be surprised.  I run sites that have #1 search hits based on particular sets of keywords, so that would be why I haven&#39;t noticed that any top results hadn&#39;t earned their position.  Google hasn&#39;t received one nickel from me to achieve these positions.</p>
<p>I also think people are smarter than are given credit for.  The organic results on Google are far more prominent than paid ones, and the paid ones have a clear heading &#8220;Sponsored Links&#8221;.  I would think that natural human behavior would lean one to choose what is more in front and isn&#39;t obviously paid for.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

