<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Reader Trends Reveals Your Reading Habits</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.socialmediaexplorer.com/2009/07/13/google-reader-trends-reveals-your-reading-habits/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.socialmediaexplorer.com/2009/07/13/google-reader-trends-reveals-your-reading-habits/</link>
	<description>Social Media Consulting, Public Speaking and Education</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 14:08:12 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Is marketing the last to get social media (correctly, that is)? Or do they play nice in the sandbox with Corp Comm? &#171; Social media, healthcare, whatever&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.socialmediaexplorer.com/2009/07/13/google-reader-trends-reveals-your-reading-habits/comment-page-2/#comment-24520</link>
		<dc:creator>Is marketing the last to get social media (correctly, that is)? Or do they play nice in the sandbox with Corp Comm? &#171; Social media, healthcare, whatever&#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 14:26:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socialmediaexplorer.com/?p=1682#comment-24520</guid>
		<description>[...] pages for new programs and initiatives instead. However, as Amy notes in her blog whilst quoting Jason Falls, &#8220;corporate Web sites [are] little more than online brochures.&#8221; Indeed&#8230;and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] pages for new programs and initiatives instead. However, as Amy notes in her blog whilst quoting Jason Falls, &#8220;corporate Web sites [are] little more than online brochures.&#8221; Indeed&#8230;and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OTB Think (www.otbthink.com) &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Five reasons corporations are failing at social media</title>
		<link>http://www.socialmediaexplorer.com/2009/07/13/google-reader-trends-reveals-your-reading-habits/comment-page-2/#comment-23276</link>
		<dc:creator>OTB Think (www.otbthink.com) &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Five reasons corporations are failing at social media</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 13:33:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socialmediaexplorer.com/?p=1682#comment-23276</guid>
		<description>[...] Jason Falls chastised corporate Web sites for being little more than online brochures. Customers expect interaction. Content creation is key to social media success, and every company should have a Web site with a content management system that allows for quick, easy content creation without the IT department needing to recode a Web site. Anyone in the organization should be able to publish via a CMS. And companies can’t expect to have a strong social media presence when social sites are blocked internally to employees. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Jason Falls chastised corporate Web sites for being little more than online brochures. Customers expect interaction. Content creation is key to social media success, and every company should have a Web site with a content management system that allows for quick, easy content creation without the IT department needing to recode a Web site. Anyone in the organization should be able to publish via a CMS. And companies can’t expect to have a strong social media presence when social sites are blocked internally to employees. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Five Reasons Corporations are failing at Social Media</title>
		<link>http://www.socialmediaexplorer.com/2009/07/13/google-reader-trends-reveals-your-reading-habits/comment-page-2/#comment-23270</link>
		<dc:creator>Five Reasons Corporations are failing at Social Media</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 08:34:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socialmediaexplorer.com/?p=1682#comment-23270</guid>
		<description>[...] Jason Falls chastised corporate Web sites for being little more than online brochures. Customers expect interaction. Content creation is key to social media success, and every company should have a Web site with a content management system that allows for quick, easy content creation without the IT department needing to recode a Web site. Anyone in the organization should be able to publish via a CMS. And companies can’t expect to have a strong social media presence when social sites are blocked internally to employees. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Jason Falls chastised corporate Web sites for being little more than online brochures. Customers expect interaction. Content creation is key to social media success, and every company should have a Web site with a content management system that allows for quick, easy content creation without the IT department needing to recode a Web site. Anyone in the organization should be able to publish via a CMS. And companies can’t expect to have a strong social media presence when social sites are blocked internally to employees. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Five reasons corporations are failing at social media</title>
		<link>http://www.socialmediaexplorer.com/2009/07/13/google-reader-trends-reveals-your-reading-habits/comment-page-2/#comment-23259</link>
		<dc:creator>Five reasons corporations are failing at social media</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 23:21:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socialmediaexplorer.com/?p=1682#comment-23259</guid>
		<description>[...] Jason Falls chastised corporate Web sites for being little more than online brochures. Customers expect interaction. Content creation is key to social media success, and every company should have a Web site with a content management system that allows for quick, easy content creation without the IT department needing to recode a Web site. Anyone in the organization should be able to publish via a CMS. And companies can’t expect to have a strong social media presence when social sites are blocked internally to employees. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Jason Falls chastised corporate Web sites for being little more than online brochures. Customers expect interaction. Content creation is key to social media success, and every company should have a Web site with a content management system that allows for quick, easy content creation without the IT department needing to recode a Web site. Anyone in the organization should be able to publish via a CMS. And companies can’t expect to have a strong social media presence when social sites are blocked internally to employees. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Five Reasons Corporations are Failing at Social Media. &#124; GAby Menta</title>
		<link>http://www.socialmediaexplorer.com/2009/07/13/google-reader-trends-reveals-your-reading-habits/comment-page-2/#comment-23243</link>
		<dc:creator>Five Reasons Corporations are Failing at Social Media. &#124; GAby Menta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 10:18:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socialmediaexplorer.com/?p=1682#comment-23243</guid>
		<description>[...] Jason Falls chastised corporate Web sites for being little more than online brochures. Customers expect interaction. Content creation is key to social media success, and every company should have a Web site with a content management system that allows for quick, easy content creation without the IT department needing to recode a Web site. Anyone in the organization should be able to publish via a CMS. And companies can’t expect to have a strong social media presence when social sites are blocked internally to employees. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Jason Falls chastised corporate Web sites for being little more than online brochures. Customers expect interaction. Content creation is key to social media success, and every company should have a Web site with a content management system that allows for quick, easy content creation without the IT department needing to recode a Web site. Anyone in the organization should be able to publish via a CMS. And companies can’t expect to have a strong social media presence when social sites are blocked internally to employees. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Five reasons corporations are failing at social media &#124; Dodging Spiderwebs</title>
		<link>http://www.socialmediaexplorer.com/2009/07/13/google-reader-trends-reveals-your-reading-habits/comment-page-2/#comment-23185</link>
		<dc:creator>Five reasons corporations are failing at social media &#124; Dodging Spiderwebs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 14:46:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socialmediaexplorer.com/?p=1682#comment-23185</guid>
		<description>[...] Jason Falls chastised corporate Web sites for being little more than online brochures. Customers expect interaction. Content creation is key to social media success, and every company should have a Web site with a content management system that allows for quick, easy content creation without the IT department needing to recode a Web site. Anyone in the organization should be able to publish via a CMS. And companies can’t expect to have a strong social media presence when social sites are blocked internally to employees. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Jason Falls chastised corporate Web sites for being little more than online brochures. Customers expect interaction. Content creation is key to social media success, and every company should have a Web site with a content management system that allows for quick, easy content creation without the IT department needing to recode a Web site. Anyone in the organization should be able to publish via a CMS. And companies can’t expect to have a strong social media presence when social sites are blocked internally to employees. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Five reasons corporations are failing at social media — Mengel Musings by Amy Mengel</title>
		<link>http://www.socialmediaexplorer.com/2009/07/13/google-reader-trends-reveals-your-reading-habits/comment-page-2/#comment-23170</link>
		<dc:creator>Five reasons corporations are failing at social media — Mengel Musings by Amy Mengel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 02:26:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socialmediaexplorer.com/?p=1682#comment-23170</guid>
		<description>[...] Jason Falls chastised corporate Web sites for being little more than online brochures. Customers expect interaction. Content creation is key to social media success, and every company should have a Web site with a content management system that allows for quick, easy content creation without the IT department needing to recode a Web site. Anyone in the organization should be able to publish via a CMS. And companies can&#8217;t expect to have a strong social media presence when social sites are blocked internally to employees. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Jason Falls chastised corporate Web sites for being little more than online brochures. Customers expect interaction. Content creation is key to social media success, and every company should have a Web site with a content management system that allows for quick, easy content creation without the IT department needing to recode a Web site. Anyone in the organization should be able to publish via a CMS. And companies can&#8217;t expect to have a strong social media presence when social sites are blocked internally to employees. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: How I use Google Reader without going insane — Mengel Musings</title>
		<link>http://www.socialmediaexplorer.com/2009/07/13/google-reader-trends-reveals-your-reading-habits/comment-page-2/#comment-22588</link>
		<dc:creator>How I use Google Reader without going insane — Mengel Musings</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 15:48:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socialmediaexplorer.com/?p=1682#comment-22588</guid>
		<description>[...] based on how I&#8217;ve prioritized the blogs I&#8217;ve subscribed to. Every few weeks I&#8217;ll look at the trends and analytics that Google Reader provides and see if there are blogs that I&#8217;m consistently reading or not reading and move them to a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] based on how I&#8217;ve prioritized the blogs I&#8217;ve subscribed to. Every few weeks I&#8217;ll look at the trends and analytics that Google Reader provides and see if there are blogs that I&#8217;m consistently reading or not reading and move them to a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: magreet</title>
		<link>http://www.socialmediaexplorer.com/2009/07/13/google-reader-trends-reveals-your-reading-habits/comment-page-2/#comment-21503</link>
		<dc:creator>magreet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 08:08:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socialmediaexplorer.com/?p=1682#comment-21503</guid>
		<description>Nice post I Like your site very much and continue to do so.I think that the word is not enough to appreciate this article i come across very interesting. Keep it up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice post I Like your site very much and continue to do so.I think that the word is not enough to appreciate this article i come across very interesting. Keep it up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tamar Weinberg</title>
		<link>http://www.socialmediaexplorer.com/2009/07/13/google-reader-trends-reveals-your-reading-habits/comment-page-2/#comment-21144</link>
		<dc:creator>Tamar Weinberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 11:07:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socialmediaexplorer.com/?p=1682#comment-21144</guid>
		<description>I got to see it thanks to Backtype.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The thing is, I&#039;m just hitting the default &quot;next next next next next&quot; shortcut keys.  I&#039;m not even considering using an alternative shortcut.  I really don&#039;t think it&#039;s Google&#039;s priority, but if they wanted to, they should assess the length of a feed item and figure out how long someone actually spends &quot;reading&quot; the content.  If the content is &quot;nexted&quot; quickly, it probably was not read at all.  If it wasn&#039;t, Google should assume it was read.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I got to see it thanks to Backtype.</p>
<p>The thing is, I&#39;m just hitting the default &#8220;next next next next next&#8221; shortcut keys.  I&#39;m not even considering using an alternative shortcut.  I really don&#39;t think it&#39;s Google&#39;s priority, but if they wanted to, they should assess the length of a feed item and figure out how long someone actually spends &#8220;reading&#8221; the content.  If the content is &#8220;nexted&#8221; quickly, it probably was not read at all.  If it wasn&#39;t, Google should assume it was read.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JasonBrett</title>
		<link>http://www.socialmediaexplorer.com/2009/07/13/google-reader-trends-reveals-your-reading-habits/comment-page-2/#comment-21138</link>
		<dc:creator>JasonBrett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 13:17:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socialmediaexplorer.com/?p=1682#comment-21138</guid>
		<description>Thinking about this today, I&#039;d like to discriminate in trends between posts that I marked as uninteresting, or ignored. So &quot;mark as read&quot; and &quot;mark as ignored&quot; would, I think, largely give us the trust in our trends that we are looking for.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;What do you think?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thinking about this today, I&#39;d like to discriminate in trends between posts that I marked as uninteresting, or ignored. So &#8220;mark as read&#8221; and &#8220;mark as ignored&#8221; would, I think, largely give us the trust in our trends that we are looking for.</p>
<p>What do you think?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 1.392 seconds -->
