<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Ethics, Or Lack Thereof, Of Ghost Blogging</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.socialmediaexplorer.com/2009/08/21/the-ethics-of-ghost-blogging/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.socialmediaexplorer.com/social-media-marketing/the-ethics-of-ghost-blogging/</link>
	<description>Social Media Consulting, Public Speaking and Education</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 23:09:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Making the Argument for Ghost Blogging. Yet Again.</title>
		<link>http://www.socialmediaexplorer.com/social-media-marketing/the-ethics-of-ghost-blogging/comment-page-3/#comment-51257</link>
		<dc:creator>Making the Argument for Ghost Blogging. Yet Again.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 20:06:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socialmediaexplorer.com/?p=1809#comment-51257</guid>
		<description>[...] Answer: It isn&#8217;t. Not a bit. They are exactly the same thing. (In fact, Jason Falls says that we&#8217;re not ghostwriters, we&#8217;re copywriters, and that it&amp;#8...) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Answer: It isn&#8217;t. Not a bit. They are exactly the same thing. (In fact, Jason Falls says that we&#8217;re not ghostwriters, we&#8217;re copywriters, and that it&amp;#8&#8230;) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greetings (and Ghostblogging Ethics) &#124; Council of Public Relations Firms</title>
		<link>http://www.socialmediaexplorer.com/social-media-marketing/the-ethics-of-ghost-blogging/comment-page-3/#comment-47366</link>
		<dc:creator>Greetings (and Ghostblogging Ethics) &#124; Council of Public Relations Firms</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Aug 2011 19:55:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socialmediaexplorer.com/?p=1809#comment-47366</guid>
		<description>[...] or tweets without revealing this fact to readers? It’s a grey area that is beginning to inspire considerable discussion.  Some commentators have sought to come up with ethical guideposts. According to one PR website, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] or tweets without revealing this fact to readers? It’s a grey area that is beginning to inspire considerable discussion.  Some commentators have sought to come up with ethical guideposts. According to one PR website, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BOO! It&#8217;s Ghost Blogging &#124; Lisa Shea&#039;s Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.socialmediaexplorer.com/social-media-marketing/the-ethics-of-ghost-blogging/comment-page-3/#comment-35391</link>
		<dc:creator>BOO! It&#8217;s Ghost Blogging &#124; Lisa Shea&#039;s Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Oct 2010 22:28:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socialmediaexplorer.com/?p=1809#comment-35391</guid>
		<description>[...] very easy to think that Ghost Blogging is wrong. Jason Falls for example, believes that ghost authoring of any kind is a dishonest profession for very obvious [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] very easy to think that Ghost Blogging is wrong. Jason Falls for example, believes that ghost authoring of any kind is a dishonest profession for very obvious [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Future Of Social Is In Content Solutions, Syndication &#124; Marketing latest news and new marketing news</title>
		<link>http://www.socialmediaexplorer.com/social-media-marketing/the-ethics-of-ghost-blogging/comment-page-3/#comment-32791</link>
		<dc:creator>The Future Of Social Is In Content Solutions, Syndication &#124; Marketing latest news and new marketing news</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jul 2010 23:00:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socialmediaexplorer.com/?p=1809#comment-32791</guid>
		<description>[...] blogging services (I hate calling them ghost blogging services for reasons you can see in this 2009 post about the topic) and free-lance web content providers should see a boon in the need for their services in the next [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] blogging services (I hate calling them ghost blogging services for reasons you can see in this 2009 post about the topic) and free-lance web content providers should see a boon in the need for their services in the next [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Is Corporate Ghost Blogging Ethical?</title>
		<link>http://www.socialmediaexplorer.com/social-media-marketing/the-ethics-of-ghost-blogging/comment-page-3/#comment-32639</link>
		<dc:creator>Is Corporate Ghost Blogging Ethical?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jun 2010 19:37:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socialmediaexplorer.com/?p=1809#comment-32639</guid>
		<description>[...] The Ethics, Or Lack Thereof, Of Ghost Blogging, by Jason Falls on Social Media Explorer [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Ethics, Or Lack Thereof, Of Ghost Blogging, by Jason Falls on Social Media Explorer [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Thomas</title>
		<link>http://www.socialmediaexplorer.com/social-media-marketing/the-ethics-of-ghost-blogging/comment-page-2/#comment-33406</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2010 19:17:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socialmediaexplorer.com/?p=1809#comment-33406</guid>
		<description>Holy comments Batman.  I wish I had time to read them all.  I appreciate you digging up this post and this is obvious proof that cross-linking works!  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I&#039;ve always been what my former boss calls a &quot;West Coast Marketer&quot;, where I am all about the customer and content, perhaps unfortunately thinking about profit last.  I don&#039;t like to gate content and love free content.  The more advertising on a blog the more annoyed I get, and hearing &quot;MLM&quot; and &quot;Affiliate&quot; gives me the chills.  I blog because I love what I write about and want to help others.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So it&#039;s no surprise that ghost blogging seems like an egregious offense to me, but I do like your proposed parameters.  I agree that there&#039;s a gray area and there is definitely a place for copywriters and editors to improve the readability and effectiveness of the content, which in the end only helps the reader.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Of the comments I&#039;ve read, I don&#039;t think you&#039;ll have too many people pro-(pure)ghostblogging.  If you understand the blog medium, you know that ghostblogging in its truest form is dishonest, unethical, and is never a long-term strategy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Holy comments Batman.  I wish I had time to read them all.  I appreciate you digging up this post and this is obvious proof that cross-linking works!  </p>
<p>I&#39;ve always been what my former boss calls a &#8220;West Coast Marketer&#8221;, where I am all about the customer and content, perhaps unfortunately thinking about profit last.  I don&#39;t like to gate content and love free content.  The more advertising on a blog the more annoyed I get, and hearing &#8220;MLM&#8221; and &#8220;Affiliate&#8221; gives me the chills.  I blog because I love what I write about and want to help others.  </p>
<p>So it&#39;s no surprise that ghost blogging seems like an egregious offense to me, but I do like your proposed parameters.  I agree that there&#39;s a gray area and there is definitely a place for copywriters and editors to improve the readability and effectiveness of the content, which in the end only helps the reader.  </p>
<p>Of the comments I&#39;ve read, I don&#39;t think you&#39;ll have too many people pro-(pure)ghostblogging.  If you understand the blog medium, you know that ghostblogging in its truest form is dishonest, unethical, and is never a long-term strategy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Thomas</title>
		<link>http://www.socialmediaexplorer.com/social-media-marketing/the-ethics-of-ghost-blogging/comment-page-2/#comment-32550</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2010 12:17:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socialmediaexplorer.com/?p=1809#comment-32550</guid>
		<description>Holy comments Batman.  I wish I had time to read them all.  I appreciate you digging up this post and this is obvious proof that cross-linking works!  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I&#039;ve always been what my former boss calls a &quot;West Coast Marketer&quot;, where I am all about the customer and content, perhaps unfortunately thinking about profit last.  I don&#039;t like to gate content and love free content.  The more advertising on a blog the more annoyed I get, and hearing &quot;MLM&quot; and &quot;Affiliate&quot; gives me the chills.  I blog because I love what I write about and want to help others.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So it&#039;s no surprise that ghost blogging seems like an egregious offense to me, but I do like your proposed parameters.  I agree that there&#039;s a gray area and there is definitely a place for copywriters and editors to improve the readability and effectiveness of the content, which in the end only helps the reader.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Of the comments I&#039;ve read, I don&#039;t think you&#039;ll have too many people pro-(pure)ghostblogging.  If you understand the blog medium, you know that ghostblogging in its truest form is dishonest, unethical, and is never a long-term strategy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Holy comments Batman.  I wish I had time to read them all.  I appreciate you digging up this post and this is obvious proof that cross-linking works!  </p>
<p>I&#39;ve always been what my former boss calls a &#8220;West Coast Marketer&#8221;, where I am all about the customer and content, perhaps unfortunately thinking about profit last.  I don&#39;t like to gate content and love free content.  The more advertising on a blog the more annoyed I get, and hearing &#8220;MLM&#8221; and &#8220;Affiliate&#8221; gives me the chills.  I blog because I love what I write about and want to help others.  </p>
<p>So it&#39;s no surprise that ghost blogging seems like an egregious offense to me, but I do like your proposed parameters.  I agree that there&#39;s a gray area and there is definitely a place for copywriters and editors to improve the readability and effectiveness of the content, which in the end only helps the reader.  </p>
<p>Of the comments I&#39;ve read, I don&#39;t think you&#39;ll have too many people pro-(pure)ghostblogging.  If you understand the blog medium, you know that ghostblogging in its truest form is dishonest, unethical, and is never a long-term strategy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Content Solutions And Syndication Providers Have Opportunity Before Them</title>
		<link>http://www.socialmediaexplorer.com/social-media-marketing/the-ethics-of-ghost-blogging/comment-page-2/#comment-32543</link>
		<dc:creator>Content Solutions And Syndication Providers Have Opportunity Before Them</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2010 10:06:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socialmediaexplorer.com/?p=1809#comment-32543</guid>
		<description>[...] blogging services (I hate calling them ghost blogging services for reasons you can see in this 2009 post about the topic) and free-lance web content providers should see a boon in the need for their services in the next [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] blogging services (I hate calling them ghost blogging services for reasons you can see in this 2009 post about the topic) and free-lance web content providers should see a boon in the need for their services in the next [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JasonFalls</title>
		<link>http://www.socialmediaexplorer.com/social-media-marketing/the-ethics-of-ghost-blogging/comment-page-2/#comment-30210</link>
		<dc:creator>JasonFalls</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2010 17:27:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socialmediaexplorer.com/?p=1809#comment-30210</guid>
		<description>In my opinion, which some certainly disagree with, a CEO should write their&lt;br&gt;own posts whenever they can. Less frequent but genuine is better than more&lt;br&gt;frequent, but someone else&#039;s work with his/her sign-off. And I agree with&lt;br&gt;you about the comments. They are important. Many CEOs don&#039;t respond, but the&lt;br&gt;ones that do are automatically more trusted and appreciated for the efforts.&lt;br&gt;Thanks for the comment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In my opinion, which some certainly disagree with, a CEO should write their<br />own posts whenever they can. Less frequent but genuine is better than more<br />frequent, but someone else&#39;s work with his/her sign-off. And I agree with<br />you about the comments. They are important. Many CEOs don&#39;t respond, but the<br />ones that do are automatically more trusted and appreciated for the efforts.<br />Thanks for the comment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anneorchard</title>
		<link>http://www.socialmediaexplorer.com/social-media-marketing/the-ethics-of-ghost-blogging/comment-page-2/#comment-30209</link>
		<dc:creator>anneorchard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2010 16:38:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socialmediaexplorer.com/?p=1809#comment-30209</guid>
		<description>This is a very interesting dicussion - I appreciate all the comments which are expanding on the topic. I would like to ask what your opinion is about frequency. If the CEO does not have a lot of time, is it better for them to write an occasional post that is really from them, be present and reply to comments - or to have frequency of updates but not time to respond (I also think responding to comments is very important)? I think I would prefer the former - some of the blogs I have switched away from the fastest are those with frequent automated updates where it is obvious that there is nobody home, and so there is no point in commenting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a very interesting dicussion &#8211; I appreciate all the comments which are expanding on the topic. I would like to ask what your opinion is about frequency. If the CEO does not have a lot of time, is it better for them to write an occasional post that is really from them, be present and reply to comments &#8211; or to have frequency of updates but not time to respond (I also think responding to comments is very important)? I think I would prefer the former &#8211; some of the blogs I have switched away from the fastest are those with frequent automated updates where it is obvious that there is nobody home, and so there is no point in commenting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PR Connection: Ghost Blogging-Is it Ethical? &#171; Michellev21&#39;s Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.socialmediaexplorer.com/social-media-marketing/the-ethics-of-ghost-blogging/comment-page-2/#comment-28903</link>
		<dc:creator>PR Connection: Ghost Blogging-Is it Ethical? &#171; Michellev21&#39;s Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Feb 2010 05:33:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socialmediaexplorer.com/?p=1809#comment-28903</guid>
		<description>[...] ***Jason Falls of Social Media Explorer has some great views on ghostblogging. Check out his post-it really puts the issue into perspective! http://www.socialmediaexplorer.com/2009/08/21/the-ethics-of-ghost-blogging/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] ***Jason Falls of Social Media Explorer has some great views on ghostblogging. Check out his post-it really puts the issue into perspective! <a href="http://www.socialmediaexplorer.com/2009/08/21/the-ethics-of-ghost-blogging/" rel="nofollow">http://www.socialmediaexplorer.com/2009/08/21/the-ethics-of-ghost-blogging/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

