• From my own experience, I get a lot more hits from twitter than anywhere else.

    The problem I have with this study is that it's just through the use of the share button. It takes no account of the folks that are slightly MORE tech savvy and have their preferred twitter client/link burner at the ready when they want to share something.

    So you have a very underrepresented sample of the population, only folks who use the button, on sites that have the button.

    I wouldn't put too much faith in the conclusions drawn.

    When you consider the automation features built into social-minded sites like youtube, reverbnation, delicious, etc it becomes obvious that there isn't much real worth to the report as a commentary on the overall usage of social media.

    What it DOES say is that the same lazy folks that send chain emails are still out there, doing it with more bells and whistles, and we cannot forget to reach out to them.
  • I think my question would be whether one medium is more viral than the other and whether or not there is a response difference between any of them. What I generally tell people is that one doesn't replace the other, there will always be email for instance, but with each passing year the options to communicate with each other increases. You don't to replace email with Twitter or Facebook, you aim to supplement it with new social media channels.
  • Fair observation. Thanks for that. I think the viral-ness (to invent a
    word) is what the statistics are getting at. Email still seems to be
    the anchor point for viral activity. But when you look at the
    engagement indicators, perhaps the Facebooks of the world have some
    legs to stand on. Of course, nothing goes viral because of the medium,
    but because of the content. Thanks for the comment.
  • Interesting numbers, I am curious though on what kind of informations is shared where. To me this would be true for private sharing, such as funny youtube clips or news related to my hobbies. However when it comes to more professional content I share most on LinkedIn and Twitter, and I find this to be the same by the people I follow on the two networks. Though this is only a insignificant number from the amount in the research it is still interesting to add to the discussion. Where do people share what? Does the content matter to where you share it? Does your backgroup, job or geographical area matter? Sure, I can see the stats being true in general, but I would like to know more about what content is published where.
  • I certainly agree the stats are skewed a bit from what is probably
    common/standard, but keep in mind the data is just from their share
    widget. Not only are there other share widgets out there, but many
    users may prefer to share without the widget help. Good thoughts.
    Thanks for the input.
  • These interesting findings make Twitter look so much smaller and less influential than what the media buzz around it has claimed in the last couple of years. I wonder if "ordinary" users will ever see the benefits in using Twitter for social networking. I have a feeling it is destined to be a geek-only tool.
  • These interesting findings make Twitter look so much smaller and less influential than what the media buzz around it has claimed in the last couple of years. I wonder if "ordinary" users will ever see the benefits in using Twitter for social networking. I have a feeling it is destined to be a geek-only tool.
  • Fair points, Isaac. I think there is some behavioral skewing here,
    though. Twitter is a big-time network for sharing (Retweets, etc.) and
    that should be reflected here. However, most Twitter users
    (anecdotally speaking) are somewhat tech savvy and probably have other
    methods of sharing than clicking on a social sharing service button.
    I'd say the true answer is probably somewhere in between Twitter being
    geek only and the numbers being skewed for some odd reason. Thanks for
    the comment.
  • tommy_landry
    I'd wager the low Twitter numbers are because using "ShareThis" or another service does not allow for you to track clicks. I port all Twitter posts / shares over to HootSuite to get the ow.ly shortener with click stats. In other words, the numbers can't be accurately counted by any method other than a direct-to-user survey. But a nice take on it nonetheless.

    Regarding the high %%% of email sharing, that's because the Baby Boomers don't really "get" social media for anything but reconnecting with high school friends. These numbers will undergo a massive shift as the "net generation" starts to take over the business world.

    That's my 2 cents worth, anyway.
  • Interesting stats here about sharing via emails. I guess I am in the majority, but I feel that lately I have been doing a lot more sharing via twitter and facebook, and private messageboards with friends and colleagues. I think that people will begin to share more with twitter, however, the character limitations will definitely confine the amount of sharing that goes on.
  • Thanks for the thoughts. Appreciate the comment.
  • It is always good to be reminded that most of the world does not live on Facebook, Twitter, and blog comments. Reaching outside of the bubble of social media is so important. The growth lines are clear. But if we listen to ourselves and "go where the people are" we will realize, a lot of the people are not where we spend so much of our time.
  • Agreed, Jason. Thanks for the comment.
  • Jason,

    I was intrigued at the consumer behavior/activities within our content (used cars) & have been paying attention to who shares, when they share and why they share. They share for so many different reasons (IE: bragging, discovery, knowledge and the ever-important "wife-approval")

    The results you stated were very much inline with my internal research and from outside sources. (email & IM ruled; the other networks followed just as your data shows)

    The typical add-this/share-that buttons - even custom buttons seemed to get lost within the page and the content and the typical user would ask "Is there a way to send this to my wife?"

    I've been extremely happy with the Meebo sharing toolbar. They did a great job of simplifying the sharing process while making it very pretty on the eyes as well. http://www.AuctionDirectUSA.com

    People are moving beyond just sharing a blog post or a video - no reason why the sharing tools can't adapt to the most commonly used channels while also being extremely easy for the average user.
  • Statistics like this can be quite helpful, if marketers are clear on who their consumer is. Is it the hypertech user? The average Jane or Joe? Is there such a thing?

    I love the quote from Puller that the world of Internet Users is a lot bigger than that of tech-savvy social media experts. Our agency specializes in marketing to older consumers - Baby Boomers and beyond. So we're always focused on how Liz's 85-year-old grandma and active Boomers Ms. Jane/Mr. Joe (a little respect for age, please) share. It's still primarily email and word of mouth.

    We're advising clients to use social media tools to build relationships with seniors, but to go slowly and be choosy.
  • Sound advice for that target Erin. More than anything, studies like
    this remind us that we don't know enough about our true targets and
    need more. Thanks!
  • Because TAF is used on an array of sites, we need to take the demo of this sites into consideration. If TAF sites skew over 30, it would make sense that email is the killer app. Forrester did a study that touched on this @ http://tinyurl.com/mncmtb. Millennials tend to share promos and swag offers more than simple "brand messages" and do it on FB and text.
  • Great points! Perhaps SocialTwist can give us a profile of where the
    tool is used. Thanks for the thoughts.

    ---------------------
    Jason Falls
    jason@socialmediaexplorer.com
    Twitter: @JasonFalls
    C: 502.509.4SME
  • remarkablogger
    The facebook sharing is more monolithic, the twitter sharing harder to track because there's fifty ba-zillion ways to do it. However, facebook is still far more popular than twitter in terms of actual numbers of users.
  • All true. I still think the nature of Twitter users and the various
    ways you can easily share without depending upon a widget to do it
    skews the numbers a great deal. But the numbers are interesting to
    see. Thanks for the comment.
  • michellegreer
    I am curious what the tell-a-friend button looks like. If they make it easy for people to email, they'd be more likely to email. If they make it hard to tweet, less people will tweet. I looked at their site and couldn't figure it out.
  • Good question, Michelle. You can click through to their blog and see
    it. It's a small strip at the bottom of each post. Here's the link:

    http://blog.socialtwist.com/
  • I definitely agree with you that we have to remember as marketers that we're not the mainstream. What a great reminder.

    The e-mail is dead, long live e-mail mantra really struck me at Blog World this year, so this is more anecdote to support that idea.

    Something interesting, though, is that in some of my academic reading on social media, e-mail has been categorized as a social media tool for research purposes in several studies. I guess I just don't think about e-mail as being social, but it really is, and at a really powerful level: one to one. (Then again, this requires a distinction between person-to-person communication and mass mail or Spam, so maybe that's why I have mixed feelings about e-mail).

    So perhaps part of this is just a good reminder that sometimes, we need to step back and redefine how we think about these tools.
  • Awesome insights pulled there, Tiffany. I always try to keep in mind
    that how I use the tools isn't always the way others do or should.
    Email is the original online social network. And it is powerful if
    used right, even on a mass communication platform. And I've got more
    to come on email and social media, so stay tuned. Thanks for stopping
    by.
  • It would be interesting to group and track how content is shared by "inspired type." For example, would content supporting a social responsibility initiative like "clean up our rivers" be more likely shared with a larger group via Twitter and Facebook versus causes like Breast Cancer Awareness shared more likely 1:1 via instant messaging and email. If you could quantify and correlate the tendencies to use certain sharing tools and social platforms for specific "inspired content" categories, it could provide valuable insight in how best to develop the entry points for the specific destination site.
  • Good point Glenn. When we find time we will do this study.
  • Neat idea, Glenn. Thanks for the thoughts. I guess that would be a
    question for the share companies to answer. I'll poke them to see if
    they have a methodology to do so. Thanks again!
  • I've noticed this too when looking at the stats for our humor site http://dailyshite.com. We have a number of share icons at the bottom each each post (8 I believe) and Facebook is consistently used way more than the others.
  • Cool Paul. Thanks for the info (and the link). Gonna go check that
    out. (You should see my crowdsourced humor site - http://sayfunnythings.com
    .)
  • Indeed. Over at http://ariwriter.com, I've observed in recent months an increase in people receiving email subscriptions and that more people are sharing my posts via Facebook than via Twitter. The reversal is only true if the blog post is implicitly about Twitter.
  • Hi Jason: This actually makes a lot of sense to me. I think people are very picky about what they share via Twitter. I don't necessarily view my Twitter friends in the same way that I view my FB friends because they are different audiences for me. This is exactly why I would never auto stream my tweets to FB. For instance, I do a lot of live-tweeting from conferences via Twitter but not FB. I might announce on FB that people can find the live tweets on Twitter, for my journalism friends but I would never inundate those who don't connect with me on that level to that type of content. I think email is still very personal and an invitation to someone's inbox is personal. I was just debating this with a friend a few days ago. She didn't see much value in getting RSS feeds via email and I told her that when I subscribe to a blogger's newsletter I am inviting them to my inbox, and for me that's a big deal. That's when you're content is something I can't miss, when I let you into that space. Thanks for sharing all of this. I'll be sure to read the full report.
    -Angela
  • As always, you bring some great perspectives to the conversation,
    Angela. Thanks for the comment. Love the "inviting them to my inbox"
    notion. That certainly makes a statement about those particular
    bloggers/authors. Let me know if you see anything else in the report
    worth talking about. It's pretty interesting.
  • I agree with Liz. I wonder if the reason the Twitter data is low is because people are taking the URLs and putting them in Bit.ly so they can see how many clicks they get from their followers. That's what I always do. I need to know how powerful I am. :) hehe
  • Liz
    Somewhat surprising findings but also makes sense. Everyone has an email address, even my 85-year-old Grandma. So it's naturally the standard way to share anything for most people.

    I'm not surprised by the low Twitter numbers though. If you're posting to Twitter, a lot of people want to get stats on that link via their preferred URL shortener. So they skip the on-site widget.
  • Great points, Liz. The Twitter behavior in and of itself probably
    skews the numbers a bit. Thanks for the comment.
  • Participation is the future of marketing. Consumers are commentors, sharers, even distribution channels for content. But we would all be wise to remember, "I tell my friend about your brand not because I like your brand, but because I like my friends."
  • lencercone
    Imagine that, a great line from Edward Boches! If they only knew! Hope you are enjoying your new digs.
  • Such a great line just tweeted that baby out there under #quotes #branding #sm. Will remember that one for sure... :-)
  • Awesome line, Edward. Thanks for that.
  • Jason, check out the AddThis Services Directory (http://www.addthis.com/services), where we show stats for over 205 services. We also break them out by country.

    AddThis is seen by over 600 million users per month on over 500,000 sites. So, we have a unique insight into how users are sharing content across the web.
  • People are share mostly over social media, this is what I think, even Skype and Google Talk are used as most.
  • I'm sure if Skype and Google Talk were part of the Tell-A-Friend
    widget (they're not, I don't think), I doubt they'd rank really high.
    VOIP even almost seems like it doesn't belong, though you do have a
    point. If email and IM are share places, why not the old fashioned
    phone? Thanks for the thoughts.
  • I'm not very surprised, actually. I noticed a long time ago that people outside of this tiny marketing and PR bubble that we live in, are not even aware of the share-buttons' existence - much less use its more "advanced" social media functions. I have a suspicion which you might find even more shocking than these research results: For every regular mainstream person who uses the share button to e-mail something there are 10 mainstream persons who copy the link MANUALLY, log into their e-mail account, paste the link, and then send it. I see people do this all the time. An no, they're not senior citizens. :).

    I also know avid facebook-fanatics who spend a whole workday logged into facebook, and they're ecstatic when I show them the possibility of having blog posts and pictures they find online show up in their facebook news-feed. They were completely unaware of the possibility before.

  • Great adds here Vlad. Thanks for the thoughts. I suspect you're
    absolutely right. Most people just do it the old clunky way because
    they don't know better. Looks like we have our work cut out for us.
    Thanks for the comment.
  • Great info- When I want to get a feel where things are. I hit up my sister-in-law she is my benchmark for the mommy crowd. I hit up my brother in law- CEO of a successful mid-size risk management company to see that viewpoint. Tech savy both of them- socially engaged online- yep.. into it as deep as me nope- Will tell me when I am going too far and too fast.
    Both use e-mail share as their main share.. Thanks for the post I know I need more balance between what is bleeding edge, and where the mainstream on main street live..
  • Awesome Steven. Great to hear some additional information on how
    people share. It's sometimes surprising to look beyond what you're
    used to and see how other people use the web. Thanks!
blog comments powered by Disqus