<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Who Owns Your Social Media Content?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.socialmediaexplorer.com/media-journalism/who-owns-your-social-media-content/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.socialmediaexplorer.com/media-journalism/who-owns-your-social-media-content/</link>
	<description>Social Media Consulting, Public Speaking and Education</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 04:24:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hey&#8230; I Own That! &#8211; Ownership of Social Media Content &#124; Social Media at UNT</title>
		<link>http://www.socialmediaexplorer.com/media-journalism/who-owns-your-social-media-content/comment-page-1/#comment-59206</link>
		<dc:creator>Hey&#8230; I Own That! &#8211; Ownership of Social Media Content &#124; Social Media at UNT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Apr 2013 11:08:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socialmediaexplorer.com/?p=16506#comment-59206</guid>
		<description>[...] Facebook doesn’t own your content according to our reading by Kerry Gorgone, or any social media site for that matter, but they can use it in any way they [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Facebook doesn’t own your content according to our reading by Kerry Gorgone, or any social media site for that matter, but they can use it in any way they [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweeting for the brand &#124; socialmediamasters.ca</title>
		<link>http://www.socialmediaexplorer.com/media-journalism/who-owns-your-social-media-content/comment-page-1/#comment-57493</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweeting for the brand &#124; socialmediamasters.ca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2013 13:35:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socialmediaexplorer.com/?p=16506#comment-57493</guid>
		<description>[...] Overview of where you stand as of now on a few key sites, with a brief introduction to intellectual property as it relates to social media.www.socialmediaexplorer.com/&#8230;/who-owns-your-social-medi&#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Overview of where you stand as of now on a few key sites, with a brief introduction to intellectual property as it relates to social media.www.socialmediaexplorer.com/&#8230;/who-owns-your-social-medi&#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Wrap: 3 Steps to Simplify Social Media, Boost Engagement and Stay Ahead of Social Media Marketing Changes &#124; ACT Communications &#124; Frances Caballo</title>
		<link>http://www.socialmediaexplorer.com/media-journalism/who-owns-your-social-media-content/comment-page-1/#comment-56892</link>
		<dc:creator>The Wrap: 3 Steps to Simplify Social Media, Boost Engagement and Stay Ahead of Social Media Marketing Changes &#124; ACT Communications &#124; Frances Caballo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2012 11:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socialmediaexplorer.com/?p=16506#comment-56892</guid>
		<description>[...] Who Owns Your Social Media Content? &#8211; by Kerry Gorgone [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Who Owns Your Social Media Content? &#8211; by Kerry Gorgone [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Social Marketing Buzz 11-23-2012 &#124; feed140.com</title>
		<link>http://www.socialmediaexplorer.com/media-journalism/who-owns-your-social-media-content/comment-page-1/#comment-56647</link>
		<dc:creator>Social Marketing Buzz 11-23-2012 &#124; feed140.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2012 10:39:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socialmediaexplorer.com/?p=16506#comment-56647</guid>
		<description>[...] on Social Marketing, according to Social Media Explorer: posting content that you have originally created to Facebook, Twitter, Pinterest, or anywhere else [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] on Social Marketing, according to Social Media Explorer: posting content that you have originally created to Facebook, Twitter, Pinterest, or anywhere else [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Who Owns Your Social Media Content? &#124; Internet Lawyer - Internet Attorney - Internet Law Firm Texas</title>
		<link>http://www.socialmediaexplorer.com/media-journalism/who-owns-your-social-media-content/comment-page-1/#comment-56605</link>
		<dc:creator>Who Owns Your Social Media Content? &#124; Internet Lawyer - Internet Attorney - Internet Law Firm Texas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2012 06:33:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socialmediaexplorer.com/?p=16506#comment-56605</guid>
		<description>[...] Media Content? &#124; Internet Lawyer - Internet Attorney - Internet Law Firm Texas{lang:&quot;en-US&quot;}/**//**/Who Owns Your Social Media Content/**/.vvqbox{display:block;max-width:100%;visibility:visible !important;margin:10px auto}.vvqbox [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Media Content? | Internet Lawyer &#8211; Internet Attorney &#8211; Internet Law Firm Texas{lang:&quot;en-US&quot;}/**//**/Who Owns Your Social Media Content/**/.vvqbox{display:block;max-width:100%;visibility:visible !important;margin:10px auto}.vvqbox [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: professional copywriting</title>
		<link>http://www.socialmediaexplorer.com/media-journalism/who-owns-your-social-media-content/comment-page-1/#comment-56585</link>
		<dc:creator>professional copywriting</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Nov 2012 04:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socialmediaexplorer.com/?p=16506#comment-56585</guid>
		<description>

Copyright
has become a contentious issue all across the web at the moment. Since Google’s
Penguin algorithm update has made links schemes and keyword stuffing obsolete
black hat SEO methods there has been a rise in content scraping. Even though
you do own the copyright to anything that you produce, stopping others from
plagiarizing it can be difficult if not impossible. The lesson is to make sure
that the stuff that you post is something that you want people to cut and paste
into their own status updates- because they probably will.


</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Copyright<br />
has become a contentious issue all across the web at the moment. Since Google’s<br />
Penguin algorithm update has made links schemes and keyword stuffing obsolete<br />
black hat SEO methods there has been a rise in content scraping. Even though<br />
you do own the copyright to anything that you produce, stopping others from<br />
plagiarizing it can be difficult if not impossible. The lesson is to make sure<br />
that the stuff that you post is something that you want people to cut and paste<br />
into their own status updates- because they probably will.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kerry Gorgone</title>
		<link>http://www.socialmediaexplorer.com/media-journalism/who-owns-your-social-media-content/comment-page-1/#comment-56583</link>
		<dc:creator>Kerry Gorgone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2012 16:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socialmediaexplorer.com/?p=16506#comment-56583</guid>
		<description>Hi Tony,
Thanks for your reply! The answer is &quot;it depends,&quot; as is so often the case. You could protect a short phrase as a trademark, but only in your particular industry, and only if you&#039;re using the mark &quot;in commerce.&quot; You could protect the mark as shown with certain artwork, as well, but either way, it would be industry specific and you&#039;d have to be using it (or about to use it) in commerce.

Best wishes,Kerry</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Tony,<br />
Thanks for your reply! The answer is &#8220;it depends,&#8221; as is so often the case. You could protect a short phrase as a trademark, but only in your particular industry, and only if you&#8217;re using the mark &#8220;in commerce.&#8221; You could protect the mark as shown with certain artwork, as well, but either way, it would be industry specific and you&#8217;d have to be using it (or about to use it) in commerce.</p>
<p>Best wishes,Kerry</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Friday Five: Understanding Like-gate &#124; Blog @ Percolate</title>
		<link>http://www.socialmediaexplorer.com/media-journalism/who-owns-your-social-media-content/comment-page-1/#comment-56580</link>
		<dc:creator>The Friday Five: Understanding Like-gate &#124; Blog @ Percolate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2012 12:00:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socialmediaexplorer.com/?p=16506#comment-56580</guid>
		<description>[...] Who owns your social media content? A handy breakdown of how the terms of service for the major social platform might affect your ownership of the content you post to them. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Who owns your social media content? A handy breakdown of how the terms of service for the major social platform might affect your ownership of the content you post to them. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lee Swales</title>
		<link>http://www.socialmediaexplorer.com/media-journalism/who-owns-your-social-media-content/comment-page-1/#comment-56579</link>
		<dc:creator>Lee Swales</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2012 07:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socialmediaexplorer.com/?p=16506#comment-56579</guid>
		<description>Nice article.  I took a slightly different angle on this, particularly insofar as &quot;ownership&quot; of Twitter followers, or LinkedIn &quot;connections&quot; are concerned.  These two issues are currently in court and will set important precedent going forward.  My take here: http://regulatorylawsa.blogspot.com/2012/11/who-owns-your-twitter-followers.html. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice article.  I took a slightly different angle on this, particularly insofar as &#8220;ownership&#8221; of Twitter followers, or LinkedIn &#8220;connections&#8221; are concerned.  These two issues are currently in court and will set important precedent going forward.  My take here: <a href="http://regulatorylawsa.blogspot.com/2012/11/who-owns-your-twitter-followers.html. " rel="nofollow">http://regulatorylawsa.blogspot.com/2012/11/who-owns-your-twitter-followers.html. </a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: M Scott Schaffernoth</title>
		<link>http://www.socialmediaexplorer.com/media-journalism/who-owns-your-social-media-content/comment-page-1/#comment-56565</link>
		<dc:creator>M Scott Schaffernoth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2012 18:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socialmediaexplorer.com/?p=16506#comment-56565</guid>
		<description> So really the &quot;nut&quot; of the matter is:  There is the LEGAL and there is the PRACTICAL.  

When you choose to share content on a social media site, as Kerry has so eloquently pointed out, you do not lose ownership.

However, being that in real world terms you not longer have control (at least not without a great deal of effort and likely expense), your ownership is, in a practical sense, reduced to ZERO value as you cannot reasonably wield.

My thought - it is best to act as if you do understand that you are ceding ownership of anything you post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> So really the &#8220;nut&#8221; of the matter is:  There is the LEGAL and there is the PRACTICAL.  </p>
<p>When you choose to share content on a social media site, as Kerry has so eloquently pointed out, you do not lose ownership.</p>
<p>However, being that in real world terms you not longer have control (at least not without a great deal of effort and likely expense), your ownership is, in a practical sense, reduced to ZERO value as you cannot reasonably wield.</p>
<p>My thought &#8211; it is best to act as if you do understand that you are ceding ownership of anything you post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony Bennett</title>
		<link>http://www.socialmediaexplorer.com/media-journalism/who-owns-your-social-media-content/comment-page-1/#comment-56557</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony Bennett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2012 21:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socialmediaexplorer.com/?p=16506#comment-56557</guid>
		<description>Hmm, this is making me think a bit here, Kerry. I really appreciate the different examples you provided about what is, and isn&#039;t protected. 

Now here&#039;s a twist for you - what about content in conjunction w/ a short phrase? Would the short phrase be protected as part of the content(logo, picture etc) or just the picture by itself.

Thanks for the briefing, I had been wondering about this a few months back!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm, this is making me think a bit here, Kerry. I really appreciate the different examples you provided about what is, and isn&#8217;t protected. </p>
<p>Now here&#8217;s a twist for you &#8211; what about content in conjunction w/ a short phrase? Would the short phrase be protected as part of the content(logo, picture etc) or just the picture by itself.</p>
<p>Thanks for the briefing, I had been wondering about this a few months back!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
