I’ve always considered myself a public relations professional by trade. Even when the general perception of PR isn’t all that good, I still try to advocate for stronger ethics, better measures and more honorable tactics than those that give the industry an iffy reputation. But despite the last several years of trying to help many of my colleagues better understand that blasting and lists and impersonal communications is not only generally not effective but under certain conditions illegal, too many still don’t get it.

So let’s review … and this time pay attention:

  1. If you email a blogger, media member or otherwise individual with a pulse and they do not know you and didn’t ask you to email them, you are — at most — introducing yourself. If you do anything more than that, you are spamming them.
  2. If you email anyone for a commercial purpose — and outreach on behalf of a company or organization is for a commercial purpose — your email and company or firm is subject to the CAN-SPAM act. As such, among other things, your email has to have a “clear and conspicuous” explanation of how to to opt-out of your emails. By the way, you also have to clearly identify the communication as advertising. And if you think PR isn’t advertising in this case, roll the dice. I’m sure a judge won’t agree with your COM 204 professor’s definition. And PRSA is understandably nut-less, all but endorsing email spam, when it comes to their official reaction to this notion. (Thank you for prodding them, Josh.)
  3. Media database companies cannot possibly update tens of thousands of media member’s contact information or preferences to the extent you can rely on them to not get you in trouble with a blogger who agrees with the first two points. Automation, even using companies claiming to have awesome data to drive it, is not cool.
  4. Yes, this makes scaling your media outreach next to impossible. But that’s a good thing. Your “list” is supposed to be a list of personal contact information for people you know and have some sort of professional relationship or contact with. They should be glad to open your emails. Any list that is more than that is one that should comply to No. 2.

Yeah, I know it sucks. I used to think PR was easy, too. I’d download my list of 400 outlets that qualified under my target parameters, copy and paste my press release and hope like hell for some pick up. I’d follow up and call about 15 key media outlets and develop the relationship part, maybe get 5-6 of them to bite on the story, along with the 2-3 dozen small town newspapers that were so starved for content they copy-pasted my release, and made my clients or bosses happy.

You’re in the communications business. Communications wasn’t meant to be one to many. It’s unnatural.

You can build a list all you want, but call each person on it. Reach out to them. And reach out with nothing but getting to know them a bit in mind. If the list is too long for that to be practical, then the list is too long for that to be practical. Edit it.

And if your back is against the wall and you have to communicate one message to a lot of people you don’t know in a short amount of time, at least comply with the law with perhaps a little note like this at the end:

I’m careful to send emails to media outlets that serve audiences that may find the subject matter useful. Sometimes, media databases aren’t as accurate with the topics as I’d hope. To protect your inbox, I’m using an email software. If you’d rather not receive messages from me relevant to you and your readers, just opt out by clicking here. If I’ve sent an irrelevant message, I apologize. It was unintentional.

And while I’m not the know all and end all to PR or outreach and your response and feedback is not only welcome but encouraged, there is one thing I’d like to ask you to do in addition to share your thoughts:

  1. Share this post on Facebook
  2. Tweet a link to it asking your PR colleagues and friends to read it
  3. Email the link to any PR people you know, especially since they could be fined $16,000 per incident of not complying with the CAN-SPAM Act.
  4. Go update your information in media databases, or reach out to them as ask to be able to
  5. Stop … and I repeat … Stop sending email pitches without an opt-out.

Once you’re done, you can go back to your regularly scheduled blog reading. Void where prohibited.

Enhanced by Zemanta
Did you enjoy this blog post? If so, then why not:Leave Comment Below | Subscribe To This Blog | Sign Up For Our Newsletter |

About Jason Falls

Jason Falls

Jason Falls is the founder and chief instigator for Social Media Explorer's blog. He is a leading thinker, speaker and strategist in the world of digital marketing and is co-author of two books, No Bullshit Social Media: The All-Business, No-Hype Guide To Social Media Marketing and The Rebel's Guide To Email Marketing. By day, he leads digital strategy for CafePress, one of the world's largest online retailers. His opinions are his, not necessarily theirs. Follow him on Twitter (@JasonFalls).

Other posts by

Comments & Reactions

Comments Policy

Comments on Social Media Explorer are open to anyone. However, I will remove any comment that is disrespectful and not in the spirit of intelligent discourse. You are welcome to leave links to content relevant to the conversation, but I reserve the right to remove it if I don't see the relevancy. Be nice, have fun. Fair?

  • http://www.backupmd.net/shopping/consumer_electronics/ Consumer Electronics

    I am glad to catch idea from your article. It has information I have been searching for a long time.

  • http://www.onlinehomebusiness.co/ebay-business/ ebay business

    Thanks for this very useful info you have provided us. I will bookmark this for future reference and refer it to my friends. More power to your blog.

  • http://www.wayzatanautical.com/ Nautical gifts

    This article gives the light in which we can observe the reality. 

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Michele-Di-Gioia/100002944314110 Michele Di Gioia

    I am looking forward to reading new articles. Keep up the good work! Awesome blog. I enjoyed reading This is truly a great read for me. I have bookmarked it.
    immobiliare

  • http://www.shoppingsaver.com.au/ compare prices

    I wanted to thank you for this great read !! I definitely enjoyed every little bit of it and I have you bookmarked to check out new stuff you post.

  • http://www.holidayiq.com/Popular-Goa-Hotels-Resorts-Reviews-Ratings-Tariff-Rates-362-19-yes-state.html Goa Hotels

    I am glad to found such useful post. I really increased my knowledge after read your post which will be beneficial for me.

  • http://geizblog.de/ book of ra online spielen

    I am glad to found such useful post. I really increased my knowledge after read your post which will be beneficial for me.

  • Patrick Rafter

    Jason:
    A provocative post!  
    I must disagree with your take that sending a member of the media is spamming them and a violation of CAN-SPAM.

    There’s a huge difference between mass mailing pitches (which are truly SPAM, IMO) and 1-to-1 emails to a single journalist from a respectful PR person who has researched, and written a thoughtful message that is truly relevant to the writer’s beat.

    As a PR pro with 30+ yrs experience, I’ve tried to be respectful, facilitative, not annoying or irrelevant.

    Surely email remains one of the most efficient media for PR-to-Media-to-PR dialogue. Certainly better than telephone cold calls, Twitter, etc.

  • http://agrahoteldeals.com/ Agra Budget Hotels

    I appreciate, lead to I found exactly what I used to be having a look for. You have ended my four day lengthy hunt! God Bless you man. Have a nice day

  • http://www.facebook.com/hammad.aamir.1 Hammad Aamir

    As far as the Samsung GALAXY Note III is concerned, there also have been rumors concerning two different screen sizes for the phablet. One has the device coming to market with a 5.9 inch screen, while the other talks about a 6.3 inch panel. Consider that the Samsung Game Pad hinted at the larger number, and the idea that at 6.3 inches rebel mouse it would beat out the 6.1 Huawei Ascend Mate by two-tenths of an inch to have the largest screen in the business. And you can expect that the octa-core Exynos 5 CPU will also be driving the Samsung GALAXY Note III.

  • Pingback: Bob Duggan