A couple of months ago, amidst service outages galore, the Web 2.0 fishbowl was all a-Twitter about leaving Twitter for the latest microblogging/lifestreaming flavor of the month.   Prominent lifestreamers were declaring Twitter dead and telling their many followers to follow them on over to their new preferred service, whether it was FriendFeed, Plurk, Identi.ca or something else.  

And yet, here we are a couple of months later, and Twitter is still the predominant site of that type and far from dead.  

Which begs the question: now that many of these types of social networking sites are finally achieving more widespread mainstream appeal, are the “influencers” really all that influential?

Last December, Ad Age reported that social networking sites had achieved near total youth market penetration, with 96% of online tweens and teens logging on to a socnet at least weekly.  According to InsideFacebook (emphasis mine):

“Overall, Social Networking total audience grew 64 million (12%) during the last 6 months. (That’s over twice as fast as the total internet audience.)

Despite those recent growth reports, things appear to be leveling off, at least in the U.S.  Additionally,a recent Synovate study reported that 58% of adults worldwide don’t even know what “social networking” is, and 45% of U.S. internet users are reporting that they are losing interest in social networks.   

So what gives with the supposedly conflicting information?  Is social networking growing, or collapsing?

I personally think that rather than either of those options, social networking is maturing.  In the same way that a teenager experiences rapid and extremely uneven growth before settling into a more or less adult body, social networking has experienced some rapid and uneven growth.  

Now, I think people are beginning to move out of that “try every new thing that comes up” stage and moving into getting comfortable and settling in to the communities that they’ve determined are the right fit for their individual needs and preferences.  

Maybe they’re just not following the cool kids to the latest hangouts anymore like mindless adolescent lemmings.  

The truth is, no media will ever achieve 100% market penetration.  “Mainstream adoption” is a sort of nebulous, floating concept in many respects.  Even if you assume “mainstream” starts with over 50% adoption, then you have to ask “50% of what group?”  All adults?  The total population including kids? All internet users?   

For my purposes here, the definition of “mainstream adoption” is “main street adoption.”   I’m overhearing blue collar folks in a Kentucky town with a population of 167 talk about their Myspace profile.  In the last two weeks, I’ve gotten a half-dozen friend requests in Facebook from old high school classmates, and my rural high school’s graduating class was 168 people.  

Yeah, those are two very small personal anecdotes–but I’m also hearing a lot of folks inside the web 2.0/tech/marketing bubble talking about how many of their “outside the bubble” friends have recently discovered sites like Facebook and Twitter.  But there’s evidence from the mainstream media, too, if you consider all the emphasis that’s been put on the effect of social networks in this year’s election.  Unlike in previous elections, they’re not talking about the political blogosphere–they’re talking about average, individual voters who are already on Facebook and Myspace.  

If we can assume that social networks are rapidly approaching mainstream adoption, if not already there by your personal definition, then I think we have to assume that there is going to be some significant slowdown in their movement from one social site to another.

It may be a matter of months, or it may be a matter of a couple of years, but I think the sun is setting on the Day of the Social Media Pioneer.  Welcome to the dawn of the Social Media Homesteader.  

There will still be leaders and influencers in social networking.  There always are in any society.  But I think that status isn’t going to be determined primarily by being the guy or girl who got there first.  Those leaders and influencers will probably look, in actual practice, much more like a community manager, administrator, or moderator than a “guru.”  

And I don’t think their primary directives are going to be “Let’s all pack up and move West.  Again.” 

img courtesy lcumings on sxc
Did you enjoy this blog post? If so, then why not:Leave Comment Below | Subscribe To This Blog | Sign Up For Our Newsletter |

About Kat French

Kat French

Kat French is the Digital Operations Manager at CafePress. An exceptional writer both on the web and in other genres, Kat combines creativity with an agile, get-it-done attitude across a broad range of experience in community management, SEO/PPC, social media strategy and program management. She has worked with national brands like Maker's Mark, Daytona Beach Tourism, Optima Batteries and more.

Other posts by

Comments & Reactions

Comments Policy

Comments on Social Media Explorer are open to anyone. However, I will remove any comment that is disrespectful and not in the spirit of intelligent discourse. You are welcome to leave links to content relevant to the conversation, but I reserve the right to remove it if I don't see the relevancy. Be nice, have fun. Fair?

  • http://www.budgetpulse.com CraigK

    I agree with you and see less of a stretch of friends searching for the newest network to belong to. There are so many out there and new ones popping up all the time that after awhile it's an overload. People will start to narrow down which ones are meaningful and useful to them and stick with those. A lot of social networks are great, but how many are really useful to people everyday? These sites aren't as new and exciting as they once were and the trend is starting to come now.

    Craig
    http://www.budgetpulse.com

    • KatFrench

      Craig: Precisely. There is only so much time in the day, and those whose lives don't revolve around the web simply don't have enough to do the endless network-hopping you've seen among the tech/marketing/web crowd.

  • http://www.budgetpulse.com CraigK

    I agree with you and see less of a stretch of friends searching for the newest network to belong to. There are so many out there and new ones popping up all the time that after awhile it's an overload. People will start to narrow down which ones are meaningful and useful to them and stick with those. A lot of social networks are great, but how many are really useful to people everyday? These sites aren't as new and exciting as they once were and the trend is starting to come now.

    Craig
    http://www.budgetpulse.com

  • KatFrench

    Craig: Precisely. There is only so much time in the day, and those whose lives don't revolve around the web simply don't have enough to do the endless network-hopping you've seen among the tech/marketing/web crowd.

  • http://www.ribeezie.com Ricardo Bueno

    Re: “I personally think that rather than either of those options, social networking is maturing.”
    I agree! Which begs the question, where do we go from here? What's next? Defining the new social contract perhaps? Brands need to learn how to behave themselves in the social media space. As in society, there are common rules and proper etiquette to follow.

    Re: “Now, I think people are beginning to move out of that “try every new thing that comes up” stage and moving into getting comfortable and settling in to the communities that they’ve determined are the right fit for their individual needs and preferences.”
    I've always said, you don't need ALL the tools, you just need the right ones! The problem with scaling is that it's difficult to be everywhere ALL the time; especially if you're a solo-preneur (is that even a word? If not then I just made it up :-P). Having clear set goals on what you want to accomplish is necessary. Finding the tools to achieve those goals should be easier once you've defined them.

  • http://www.ribeezie.com Ricardo Bueno

    Re: “I personally think that rather than either of those options, social networking is maturing.”
    I agree! Which begs the question, where do we go from here? What's next? Defining the new social contract perhaps? Brands need to learn how to behave themselves in the social media space. As in society, there are common rules and proper etiquette to follow.

    Re: “Now, I think people are beginning to move out of that “try every new thing that comes up” stage and moving into getting comfortable and settling in to the communities that they’ve determined are the right fit for their individual needs and preferences.”
    I've always said, you don't need ALL the tools, you just need the right ones! The problem with scaling is that it's difficult to be everywhere ALL the time; especially if you're a solo-preneur (is that even a word? If not then I just made it up :-P). Having clear set goals on what you want to accomplish is necessary. Finding the tools to achieve those goals should be easier once you've defined them.

  • http://www.ribeezie.com Ricardo Bueno

    Re: “I personally think that rather than either of those options, social networking is maturing.”
    I agree! Which begs the question, where do we go from here? What's next? Defining the new social contract perhaps? Brands need to learn how to behave themselves in the social media space. As in society, there are common rules and proper etiquette to follow.

    Re: “Now, I think people are beginning to move out of that “try every new thing that comes up” stage and moving into getting comfortable and settling in to the communities that they’ve determined are the right fit for their individual needs and preferences.”
    I've always said, you don't need ALL the tools, you just need the right ones! The problem with scaling is that it's difficult to be everywhere ALL the time; especially if you're a solo-preneur (is that even a word? If not then I just made it up :-P). Having clear set goals on what you want to accomplish is necessary. Finding the tools to achieve those goals should be easier once you've defined them.

  • Pingback: The Hour Is Late » The Buzz Bin

  • Pingback: A quoi ressemble la blogosphère en 2008 ? | FredCavazza.net

  • Pingback: Les médias sociaux alternatifs diluent “l’influence” du blogueur | Chroniques du web

  • Pingback: A quoi ressemble la blogosphère en 2008 ? | FredCavazza.net « Veille de la MINUM

  • Pingback: Ideal » Archive du blog » A quoi ressemble la blogosphère en 2008 ?

  • Pingback: Blogs morts, médias sociaux mûrs, popularité et lifestream | Blog de nuit : créativité et publicité, marketing, médias sociaux

  • Pingback: VeilleMarketing.ch» Médias Sociaux Non classé » Blogs morts, médias sociaux mûrs, popularité et lifestream