social media explorer

I've been using delicious for about a year and was having exactly the same problem with chaotic tag lists. It's only recently that I figured out what to do with the whole tag taxonomy problem (or is that “tagonomy”?).

All I do is try to restrict myself to a list of 20 (ish) “approved” tags, relating to the issues my environmental organisation works on. Since our topics interest are well-defined, and the people who follow us have specific areas of interest, it works OK.

So if you want to know about, say, PVC and phthalates and alternative plastics, you can follow the content I'm tagging [plastics], keeping on top of what we think are significant stories and studies (the 700-character description box is a great place for us to explain why we think the article or study is interesting).

I can use those feeds (in theory – not actually doing it yet) to automatically populate blog posts (those ever-useful five-item lists) to keep content rolling over in the sub-sections of our website – which happen to use the same issue division that I use with my tags.

I agree with minising the amouint of content to tag as well – since delicious is about sharing, you don't want to dump 400 new items on your network every day. I find it's much better to think really hard about what the most important thing my network needs to see today, and give them that one thing – otherwise the good stuff gets lost in the noise.

Minimising the amount of tagging also makes it easier to restrict the size of your tagonomy – which should make it easier for followers to find useful content (because e.g. what's the point of an RSS feed to a tag which is only used twice a year?)

I'm pleased someone else out there is using delicious. This is my account if you want a look:
http://delicious.com/hcwheurope

I'm experimenting with introducing specific environmentally-infleunced diseases, but that's looking like it will to bloat my tagonomy to an unmanageable level.

I've been using delicious for about a year and was having exactly the same problem with chaotic tag lists. It's only recently that I figured out what to do with the whole tag taxonomy problem (or is that “tagonomy”?).

All I do is try to restrict myself to a list of 20 (ish) “approved” tags, relating to the issues my environmental organisation works on. Since our topics interest are well-defined, and the people who follow us have specific areas of interest, it works OK.

So if you want to know about, say, PVC and phthalates and alternative plastics, you can follow the content I'm tagging [plastics], keeping on top of what we think are significant stories and studies (the 700-character description box is a great place for us to explain why we think the article or study is interesting).

I can use those feeds (in theory – not actually doing it yet) to automatically populate blog posts (those ever-useful five-item lists) to keep content rolling over in the sub-sections of our website – which happen to use the same issue division that I use with my tags.

I agree with minising the amouint of content to tag as well – since delicious is about sharing, you don't want to dump 400 new items on your network every day. I find it's much better to think really hard about what the most important thing my network needs to see today, and give them that one thing – otherwise the good stuff gets lost in the noise.

Minimising the amount of tagging also makes it easier to restrict the size of your tagonomy – which should make it easier for followers to find useful content (because e.g. what's the point of an RSS feed to a tag which is only used twice a year?)

I'm pleased someone else out there is using delicious. This is my account if you want a look:
http://delicious.com/hcwheurope

I'm experimenting with introducing specific environmentally-infleunced diseases, but that's looking like it will to bloat my tagonomy to an unmanageable level.

I've been using delicious for about a year and was having exactly the same problem with chaotic tag lists. It's only recently that I figured out what to do with the whole tag taxonomy problem (or is that “tagonomy”?).

All I do is try to restrict myself to a list of 20 (ish) “approved” tags, relating to the issues my environmental organisation works on. Since our topics interest are well-defined, and the people who follow us have specific areas of interest, it works OK.

So if you want to know about, say, PVC and phthalates and alternative plastics, you can follow the content I'm tagging [plastics], keeping on top of what we think are significant stories and studies (the 700-character description box is a great place for us to explain why we think the article or study is interesting).

I can use those feeds (in theory – not actually doing it yet) to automatically populate blog posts (those ever-useful five-item lists) to keep content rolling over in the sub-sections of our website – which happen to use the same issue division that I use with my tags.

I agree with minising the amouint of content to tag as well – since delicious is about sharing, you don't want to dump 400 new items on your network every day. I find it's much better to think really hard about what the most important thing my network needs to see today, and give them that one thing – otherwise the good stuff gets lost in the noise.

Minimising the amount of tagging also makes it easier to restrict the size of your tagonomy – which should make it easier for followers to find useful content (because e.g. what's the point of an RSS feed to a tag which is only used twice a year?)

I'm pleased someone else out there is using delicious. This is my account if you want a look:
http://delicious.com/hcwheurope

I'm experimenting with introducing specific environmentally-infleunced diseases, but that's looking like it will to bloat my tagonomy to an unmanageable level.

I've been using delicious for about a year and was having exactly the same problem with chaotic tag lists. It's only recently that I figured out what to do with the whole tag taxonomy problem (or is that “tagonomy”?).

All I do is try to restrict myself to a list of 20 (ish) “approved” tags, relating to the issues my environmental organisation works on. Since our topics interest are well-defined, and the people who follow us have specific areas of interest, it works OK.

So if you want to know about, say, PVC and phthalates and alternative plastics, you can follow the content I'm tagging [plastics], keeping on top of what we think are significant stories and studies (the 700-character description box is a great place for us to explain why we think the article or study is interesting).

I can use those feeds (in theory – not actually doing it yet) to automatically populate blog posts (those ever-useful five-item lists) to keep content rolling over in the sub-sections of our website – which happen to use the same issue division that I use with my tags.

I agree with minising the amouint of content to tag as well – since delicious is about sharing, you don't want to dump 400 new items on your network every day. I find it's much better to think really hard about what the most important thing my network needs to see today, and give them that one thing – otherwise the good stuff gets lost in the noise.

Minimising the amount of tagging also makes it easier to restrict the size of your tagonomy – which should make it easier for followers to find useful content (because e.g. what's the point of an RSS feed to a tag which is only used twice a year?)

I'm pleased someone else out there is using delicious. This is my account if you want a look:
http://delicious.com/hcwheurope

I'm experimenting with introducing specific environmentally-infleunced diseases, but that's looking like it will to bloat my tagonomy to an unmanageable level.

I've been using delicious for about a year and was having exactly the same problem with chaotic tag lists. It's only recently that I figured out what to do with the whole tag taxonomy problem (or is that “tagonomy”?).

All I do is try to restrict myself to a list of 20 (ish) “approved” tags, relating to the issues my environmental organisation works on. Since our topics interest are well-defined, and the people who follow us have specific areas of interest, it works OK.

So if you want to know about, say, PVC and phthalates and alternative plastics, you can follow the content I'm tagging [plastics], keeping on top of what we think are significant stories and studies (the 700-character description box is a great place for us to explain why we think the article or study is interesting).

I can use those feeds (in theory – not actually doing it yet) to automatically populate blog posts (those ever-useful five-item lists) to keep content rolling over in the sub-sections of our website – which happen to use the same issue division that I use with my tags.

I agree with minising the amouint of content to tag as well – since delicious is about sharing, you don't want to dump 400 new items on your network every day. I find it's much better to think really hard about what the most important thing my network needs to see today, and give them that one thing – otherwise the good stuff gets lost in the noise.

Minimising the amount of tagging also makes it easier to restrict the size of your tagonomy – which should make it easier for followers to find useful content (because e.g. what's the point of an RSS feed to a tag which is only used twice a year?)

I'm pleased someone else out there is using delicious. This is my account if you want a look:
http://delicious.com/hcwheurope

I'm experimenting with introducing specific environmentally-infleunced diseases, but that's looking like it will to bloat my tagonomy to an unmanageable level.

I've been using delicious for about a year and was having exactly the same problem with chaotic tag lists. It's only recently that I figured out what to do with the whole tag taxonomy problem (or is that “tagonomy”?).

All I do is try to restrict myself to a list of 20 (ish) “approved” tags, relating to the issues my environmental organisation works on. Since our topics interest are well-defined, and the people who follow us have specific areas of interest, it works OK.

So if you want to know about, say, PVC and phthalates and alternative plastics, you can follow the content I'm tagging [plastics], keeping on top of what we think are significant stories and studies (the 700-character description box is a great place for us to explain why we think the article or study is interesting).

I can use those feeds (in theory – not actually doing it yet) to automatically populate blog posts (those ever-useful five-item lists) to keep content rolling over in the sub-sections of our website – which happen to use the same issue division that I use with my tags.

I agree with minising the amouint of content to tag as well – since delicious is about sharing, you don't want to dump 400 new items on your network every day. I find it's much better to think really hard about what the most important thing my network needs to see today, and give them that one thing – otherwise the good stuff gets lost in the noise.

Minimising the amount of tagging also makes it easier to restrict the size of your tagonomy – which should make it easier for followers to find useful content (because e.g. what's the point of an RSS feed to a tag which is only used twice a year?)

I'm pleased someone else out there is using delicious. This is my account if you want a look:
http://delicious.com/hcwheurope

I'm experimenting with introducing specific environmentally-infleunced diseases, but that's looking like it will to bloat my tagonomy to an unmanageable level.

I've been using delicious for about a year and was having exactly the same problem with chaotic tag lists. It's only recently that I figured out what to do with the whole tag taxonomy problem (or is that “tagonomy”?).

All I do is try to restrict myself to a list of 20 (ish) “approved” tags, relating to the issues my environmental organisation works on. Since our topics interest are well-defined, and the people who follow us have specific areas of interest, it works OK.

So if you want to know about, say, PVC and phthalates and alternative plastics, you can follow the content I'm tagging [plastics], keeping on top of what we think are significant stories and studies (the 700-character description box is a great place for us to explain why we think the article or study is interesting).

I can use those feeds (in theory – not actually doing it yet) to automatically populate blog posts (those ever-useful five-item lists) to keep content rolling over in the sub-sections of our website – which happen to use the same issue division that I use with my tags.

I agree with minising the amouint of content to tag as well – since delicious is about sharing, you don't want to dump 400 new items on your network every day. I find it's much better to think really hard about what the most important thing my network needs to see today, and give them that one thing – otherwise the good stuff gets lost in the noise.

Minimising the amount of tagging also makes it easier to restrict the size of your tagonomy – which should make it easier for followers to find useful content (because e.g. what's the point of an RSS feed to a tag which is only used twice a year?)

I'm pleased someone else out there is using delicious. This is my account if you want a look:
http://delicious.com/hcwheurope

I'm experimenting with introducing specific environmentally-infleunced diseases, but that's looking like it will to bloat my tagonomy to an unmanageable level.

I've been using delicious for about a year and was having exactly the same problem with chaotic tag lists. It's only recently that I figured out what to do with the whole tag taxonomy problem (or is that “tagonomy”?).

All I do is try to restrict myself to a list of 20 (ish) “approved” tags, relating to the issues my environmental organisation works on. Since our topics interest are well-defined, and the people who follow us have specific areas of interest, it works OK.

So if you want to know about, say, PVC and phthalates and alternative plastics, you can follow the content I'm tagging [plastics], keeping on top of what we think are significant stories and studies (the 700-character description box is a great place for us to explain why we think the article or study is interesting).

I can use those feeds (in theory – not actually doing it yet) to automatically populate blog posts (those ever-useful five-item lists) to keep content rolling over in the sub-sections of our website – which happen to use the same issue division that I use with my tags.

I agree with minising the amouint of content to tag as well – since delicious is about sharing, you don't want to dump 400 new items on your network every day. I find it's much better to think really hard about what the most important thing my network needs to see today, and give them that one thing – otherwise the good stuff gets lost in the noise.

Minimising the amount of tagging also makes it easier to restrict the size of your tagonomy – which should make it easier for followers to find useful content (because e.g. what's the point of an RSS feed to a tag which is only used twice a year?)

I'm pleased someone else out there is using delicious. This is my account if you want a look:
http://delicious.com/hcwheurope

I'm experimenting with introducing specific environmentally-infleunced diseases, but that's looking like it will to bloat my tagonomy to an unmanageable level.

I've been using delicious for about a year and was having exactly the same problem with chaotic tag lists. It's only recently that I figured out what to do with the whole tag taxonomy problem (or is that “tagonomy”?).

All I do is try to restrict myself to a list of 20 (ish) “approved” tags, relating to the issues my environmental organisation works on. Since our topics interest are well-defined, and the people who follow us have specific areas of interest, it works OK.

So if you want to know about, say, PVC and phthalates and alternative plastics, you can follow the content I'm tagging [plastics], keeping on top of what we think are significant stories and studies (the 700-character description box is a great place for us to explain why we think the article or study is interesting).

I can use those feeds (in theory – not actually doing it yet) to automatically populate blog posts (those ever-useful five-item lists) to keep content rolling over in the sub-sections of our website – which happen to use the same issue division that I use with my tags.

I agree with minising the amouint of content to tag as well – since delicious is about sharing, you don't want to dump 400 new items on your network every day. I find it's much better to think really hard about what the most important thing my network needs to see today, and give them that one thing – otherwise the good stuff gets lost in the noise.

Minimising the amount of tagging also makes it easier to restrict the size of your tagonomy – which should make it easier for followers to find useful content (because e.g. what's the point of an RSS feed to a tag which is only used twice a year?)

I'm pleased someone else out there is using delicious. This is my account if you want a look:
http://delicious.com/hcwheurope

I'm experimenting with introducing specific environmentally-infleunced diseases, but that's looking like it will to bloat my tagonomy to an unmanageable level.

I've been using delicious for about a year and was having exactly the same problem with chaotic tag lists. It's only recently that I figured out what to do with the whole tag taxonomy problem (or is that “tagonomy”?).

All I do is try to restrict myself to a list of 20 (ish) “approved” tags, relating to the issues my environmental organisation works on. Since our topics interest are well-defined, and the people who follow us have specific areas of interest, it works OK.

So if you want to know about, say, PVC and phthalates and alternative plastics, you can follow the content I'm tagging [plastics], keeping on top of what we think are significant stories and studies (the 700-character description box is a great place for us to explain why we think the article or study is interesting).

I can use those feeds (in theory – not actually doing it yet) to automatically populate blog posts (those ever-useful five-item lists) to keep content rolling over in the sub-sections of our website – which happen to use the same issue division that I use with my tags.

I agree with minising the amouint of content to tag as well – since delicious is about sharing, you don't want to dump 400 new items on your network every day. I find it's much better to think really hard about what the most important thing my network needs to see today, and give them that one thing – otherwise the good stuff gets lost in the noise.

Minimising the amount of tagging also makes it easier to restrict the size of your tagonomy – which should make it easier for followers to find useful content (because e.g. what's the point of an RSS feed to a tag which is only used twice a year?)

I'm pleased someone else out there is using delicious. This is my account if you want a look:
http://delicious.com/hcwheurope

I'm experimenting with introducing specific environmentally-infleunced diseases, but that's looking like it will to bloat my tagonomy to an unmanageable level.

I've been using delicious for about a year and was having exactly the same problem with chaotic tag lists. It's only recently that I figured out what to do with the whole tag taxonomy problem (or is that “tagonomy”?).

All I do is try to restrict myself to a list of 20 (ish) “approved” tags, relating to the issues my environmental organisation works on. Since our topics interest are well-defined, and the people who follow us have specific areas of interest, it works OK.

So if you want to know about, say, PVC and phthalates and alternative plastics, you can follow the content I'm tagging [plastics], keeping on top of what we think are significant stories and studies (the 700-character description box is a great place for us to explain why we think the article or study is interesting).

I can use those feeds (in theory – not actually doing it yet) to automatically populate blog posts (those ever-useful five-item lists) to keep content rolling over in the sub-sections of our website – which happen to use the same issue division that I use with my tags.

I agree with minising the amouint of content to tag as well – since delicious is about sharing, you don't want to dump 400 new items on your network every day. I find it's much better to think really hard about what the most important thing my network needs to see today, and give them that one thing – otherwise the good stuff gets lost in the noise.

Minimising the amount of tagging also makes it easier to restrict the size of your tagonomy – which should make it easier for followers to find useful content (because e.g. what's the point of an RSS feed to a tag which is only used twice a year?)

I'm pleased someone else out there is using delicious. This is my account if you want a look:
http://delicious.com/hcwheurope

I'm experimenting with introducing specific environmentally-infleunced diseases, but that's looking like it will to bloat my tagonomy to an unmanageable level.

I've been using delicious for about a year and was having exactly the same problem with chaotic tag lists. It's only recently that I figured out what to do with the whole tag taxonomy problem (or is that “tagonomy”?).

All I do is try to restrict myself to a list of 20 (ish) “approved” tags, relating to the issues my environmental organisation works on. Since our topics interest are well-defined, and the people who follow us have specific areas of interest, it works OK.

So if you want to know about, say, PVC and phthalates and alternative plastics, you can follow the content I'm tagging [plastics], keeping on top of what we think are significant stories and studies (the 700-character description box is a great place for us to explain why we think the article or study is interesting).

I can use those feeds (in theory – not actually doing it yet) to automatically populate blog posts (those ever-useful five-item lists) to keep content rolling over in the sub-sections of our website – which happen to use the same issue division that I use with my tags.

I agree with minising the amouint of content to tag as well – since delicious is about sharing, you don't want to dump 400 new items on your network every day. I find it's much better to think really hard about what the most important thing my network needs to see today, and give them that one thing – otherwise the good stuff gets lost in the noise.

Minimising the amount of tagging also makes it easier to restrict the size of your tagonomy – which should make it easier for followers to find useful content (because e.g. what's the point of an RSS feed to a tag which is only used twice a year?)

I'm pleased someone else out there is using delicious. This is my account if you want a look:
http://delicious.com/hcwheurope

I'm experimenting with introducing specific environmentally-infleunced diseases, but that's looking like it will to bloat my tagonomy to an unmanageable level.

I've been using delicious for about a year and was having exactly the same problem with chaotic tag lists. It's only recently that I figured out what to do with the whole tag taxonomy problem (or is that “tagonomy”?).

All I do is try to restrict myself to a list of 20 (ish) “approved” tags, relating to the issues my environmental organisation works on. Since our topics interest are well-defined, and the people who follow us have specific areas of interest, it works OK.

So if you want to know about, say, PVC and phthalates and alternative plastics, you can follow the content I'm tagging [plastics], keeping on top of what we think are significant stories and studies (the 700-character description box is a great place for us to explain why we think the article or study is interesting).

I can use those feeds (in theory – not actually doing it yet) to automatically populate blog posts (those ever-useful five-item lists) to keep content rolling over in the sub-sections of our website – which happen to use the same issue division that I use with my tags.

I agree with minising the amouint of content to tag as well – since delicious is about sharing, you don't want to dump 400 new items on your network every day. I find it's much better to think really hard about what the most important thing my network needs to see today, and give them that one thing – otherwise the good stuff gets lost in the noise.

Minimising the amount of tagging also makes it easier to restrict the size of your tagonomy – which should make it easier for followers to find useful content (because e.g. what's the point of an RSS feed to a tag which is only used twice a year?)

I'm pleased someone else out there is using delicious. This is my account if you want a look:
http://delicious.com/hcwheurope

I'm experimenting with introducing specific environmentally-infleunced diseases, but that's looking like it will to bloat my tagonomy to an unmanageable level.

I've been using delicious for about a year and was having exactly the same problem with chaotic tag lists. It's only recently that I figured out what to do with the whole tag taxonomy problem (or is that “tagonomy”?).

All I do is try to restrict myself to a list of 20 (ish) “approved” tags, relating to the issues my environmental organisation works on. Since our topics interest are well-defined, and the people who follow us have specific areas of interest, it works OK.

So if you want to know about, say, PVC and phthalates and alternative plastics, you can follow the content I'm tagging [plastics], keeping on top of what we think are significant stories and studies (the 700-character description box is a great place for us to explain why we think the article or study is interesting).

I can use those feeds (in theory – not actually doing it yet) to automatically populate blog posts (those ever-useful five-item lists) to keep content rolling over in the sub-sections of our website – which happen to use the same issue division that I use with my tags.

I agree with minising the amouint of content to tag as well – since delicious is about sharing, you don't want to dump 400 new items on your network every day. I find it's much better to think really hard about what the most important thing my network needs to see today, and give them that one thing – otherwise the good stuff gets lost in the noise.

Minimising the amount of tagging also makes it easier to restrict the size of your tagonomy – which should make it easier for followers to find useful content (because e.g. what's the point of an RSS feed to a tag which is only used twice a year?)

I'm pleased someone else out there is using delicious. This is my account if you want a look:
http://delicious.com/hcwheurope

I'm experimenting with introducing specific environmentally-infleunced diseases, but that's looking like it will to bloat my tagonomy to an unmanageable level.

I've been using delicious for about a year and was having exactly the same problem with chaotic tag lists. It's only recently that I figured out what to do with the whole tag taxonomy problem (or is that “tagonomy”?).

All I do is try to restrict myself to a list of 20 (ish) “approved” tags, relating to the issues my environmental organisation works on. Since our topics interest are well-defined, and the people who follow us have specific areas of interest, it works OK.

So if you want to know about, say, PVC and phthalates and alternative plastics, you can follow the content I'm tagging [plastics], keeping on top of what we think are significant stories and studies (the 700-character description box is a great place for us to explain why we think the article or study is interesting).

I can use those feeds (in theory – not actually doing it yet) to automatically populate blog posts (those ever-useful five-item lists) to keep content rolling over in the sub-sections of our website – which happen to use the same issue division that I use with my tags.

I agree with minising the amouint of content to tag as well – since delicious is about sharing, you don't want to dump 400 new items on your network every day. I find it's much better to think really hard about what the most important thing my network needs to see today, and give them that one thing – otherwise the good stuff gets lost in the noise.

Minimising the amount of tagging also makes it easier to restrict the size of your tagonomy – which should make it easier for followers to find useful content (because e.g. what's the point of an RSS feed to a tag which is only used twice a year?)

I'm pleased someone else out there is using delicious. This is my account if you want a look:
http://delicious.com/hcwheurope

I'm experimenting with introducing specific environmentally-infleunced diseases, but that's looking like it will to bloat my tagonomy to an unmanageable level.

I've been using delicious for about a year and was having exactly the same problem with chaotic tag lists. It's only recently that I figured out what to do with the whole tag taxonomy problem (or is that “tagonomy”?).

All I do is try to restrict myself to a list of 20 (ish) “approved” tags, relating to the issues my environmental organisation works on. Since our topics interest are well-defined, and the people who follow us have specific areas of interest, it works OK.

So if you want to know about, say, PVC and phthalates and alternative plastics, you can follow the content I'm tagging [plastics], keeping on top of what we think are significant stories and studies (the 700-character description box is a great place for us to explain why we think the article or study is interesting).

I can use those feeds (in theory – not actually doing it yet) to automatically populate blog posts (those ever-useful five-item lists) to keep content rolling over in the sub-sections of our website – which happen to use the same issue division that I use with my tags.

I agree with minising the amouint of content to tag as well – since delicious is about sharing, you don't want to dump 400 new items on your network every day. I find it's much better to think really hard about what the most important thing my network needs to see today, and give them that one thing – otherwise the good stuff gets lost in the noise.

Minimising the amount of tagging also makes it easier to restrict the size of your tagonomy – which should make it easier for followers to find useful content (because e.g. what's the point of an RSS feed to a tag which is only used twice a year?)

I'm pleased someone else out there is using delicious. This is my account if you want a look:
http://delicious.com/hcwheurope

I'm experimenting with introducing specific environmentally-infleunced diseases, but that's looking like it will to bloat my tagonomy to an unmanageable level.

I've been using delicious for about a year and was having exactly the same problem with chaotic tag lists. It's only recently that I figured out what to do with the whole tag taxonomy problem (or is that “tagonomy”?).

All I do is try to restrict myself to a list of 20 (ish) “approved” tags, relating to the issues my environmental organisation works on. Since our topics interest are well-defined, and the people who follow us have specific areas of interest, it works OK.

So if you want to know about, say, PVC and phthalates and alternative plastics, you can follow the content I'm tagging [plastics], keeping on top of what we think are significant stories and studies (the 700-character description box is a great place for us to explain why we think the article or study is interesting).

I can use those feeds (in theory – not actually doing it yet) to automatically populate blog posts (those ever-useful five-item lists) to keep content rolling over in the sub-sections of our website – which happen to use the same issue division that I use with my tags.

I agree with minising the amouint of content to tag as well – since delicious is about sharing, you don't want to dump 400 new items on your network every day. I find it's much better to think really hard about what the most important thing my network needs to see today, and give them that one thing – otherwise the good stuff gets lost in the noise.

Minimising the amount of tagging also makes it easier to restrict the size of your tagonomy – which should make it easier for followers to find useful content (because e.g. what's the point of an RSS feed to a tag which is only used twice a year?)

I'm pleased someone else out there is using delicious. This is my account if you want a look:
http://delicious.com/hcwheurope

I'm experimenting with introducing specific environmentally-infleunced diseases, but that's looking like it will to bloat my tagonomy to an unmanageable level.

I've been using delicious for about a year and was having exactly the same problem with chaotic tag lists. It's only recently that I figured out what to do with the whole tag taxonomy problem (or is that “tagonomy”?).

All I do is try to restrict myself to a list of 20 (ish) “approved” tags, relating to the issues my environmental organisation works on. Since our topics interest are well-defined, and the people who follow us have specific areas of interest, it works OK.

So if you want to know about, say, PVC and phthalates and alternative plastics, you can follow the content I'm tagging [plastics], keeping on top of what we think are significant stories and studies (the 700-character description box is a great place for us to explain why we think the article or study is interesting).

I can use those feeds (in theory – not actually doing it yet) to automatically populate blog posts (those ever-useful five-item lists) to keep content rolling over in the sub-sections of our website – which happen to use the same issue division that I use with my tags.

I agree with minising the amouint of content to tag as well – since delicious is about sharing, you don't want to dump 400 new items on your network every day. I find it's much better to think really hard about what the most important thing my network needs to see today, and give them that one thing – otherwise the good stuff gets lost in the noise.

Minimising the amount of tagging also makes it easier to restrict the size of your tagonomy – which should make it easier for followers to find useful content (because e.g. what's the point of an RSS feed to a tag which is only used twice a year?)

I'm pleased someone else out there is using delicious. This is my account if you want a look:
http://delicious.com/hcwheurope

I'm experimenting with introducing specific environmentally-infleunced diseases, but that's looking like it will to bloat my tagonomy to an unmanageable level.

I've been using delicious for about a year and was having exactly the same problem with chaotic tag lists. It's only recently that I figured out what to do with the whole tag taxonomy problem (or is that “tagonomy”?).

All I do is try to restrict myself to a list of 20 (ish) “approved” tags, relating to the issues my environmental organisation works on. Since our topics interest are well-defined, and the people who follow us have specific areas of interest, it works OK.

So if you want to know about, say, PVC and phthalates and alternative plastics, you can follow the content I'm tagging [plastics], keeping on top of what we think are significant stories and studies (the 700-character description box is a great place for us to explain why we think the article or study is interesting).

I can use those feeds (in theory – not actually doing it yet) to automatically populate blog posts (those ever-useful five-item lists) to keep content rolling over in the sub-sections of our website – which happen to use the same issue division that I use with my tags.

I agree with minising the amouint of content to tag as well – since delicious is about sharing, you don't want to dump 400 new items on your network every day. I find it's much better to think really hard about what the most important thing my network needs to see today, and give them that one thing – otherwise the good stuff gets lost in the noise.

Minimising the amount of tagging also makes it easier to restrict the size of your tagonomy – which should make it easier for followers to find useful content (because e.g. what's the point of an RSS feed to a tag which is only used twice a year?)

I'm pleased someone else out there is using delicious. This is my account if you want a look:
http://delicious.com/hcwheurope

I'm experimenting with introducing specific environmentally-infleunced diseases, but that's looking like it will to bloat my tagonomy to an unmanageable level.

I've been using delicious for about a year and was having exactly the same problem with chaotic tag lists. It's only recently that I figured out what to do with the whole tag taxonomy problem (or is that “tagonomy”?).

All I do is try to restrict myself to a list of 20 (ish) “approved” tags, relating to the issues my environmental organisation works on. Since our topics interest are well-defined, and the people who follow us have specific areas of interest, it works OK.

So if you want to know about, say, PVC and phthalates and alternative plastics, you can follow the content I'm tagging [plastics], keeping on top of what we think are significant stories and studies (the 700-character description box is a great place for us to explain why we think the article or study is interesting).

I can use those feeds (in theory – not actually doing it yet) to automatically populate blog posts (those ever-useful five-item lists) to keep content rolling over in the sub-sections of our website – which happen to use the same issue division that I use with my tags.

I agree with minising the amouint of content to tag as well – since delicious is about sharing, you don't want to dump 400 new items on your network every day. I find it's much better to think really hard about what the most important thing my network needs to see today, and give them that one thing – otherwise the good stuff gets lost in the noise.

Minimising the amount of tagging also makes it easier to restrict the size of your tagonomy – which should make it easier for followers to find useful content (because e.g. what's the point of an RSS feed to a tag which is only used twice a year?)

I'm pleased someone else out there is using delicious. This is my account if you want a look:
http://delicious.com/hcwheurope

I'm experimenting with introducing specific environmentally-infleunced diseases, but that's looking like it will to bloat my tagonomy to an unmanageable level.

I've been using delicious for about a year and was having exactly the same problem with chaotic tag lists. It's only recently that I figured out what to do with the whole tag taxonomy problem (or is that “tagonomy”?).

All I do is try to restrict myself to a list of 20 (ish) “approved” tags, relating to the issues my environmental organisation works on. Since our topics interest are well-defined, and the people who follow us have specific areas of interest, it works OK.

So if you want to know about, say, PVC and phthalates and alternative plastics, you can follow the content I'm tagging [plastics], keeping on top of what we think are significant stories and studies (the 700-character description box is a great place for us to explain why we think the article or study is interesting).

I can use those feeds (in theory – not actually doing it yet) to automatically populate blog posts (those ever-useful five-item lists) to keep content rolling over in the sub-sections of our website – which happen to use the same issue division that I use with my tags.

I agree with minising the amouint of content to tag as well – since delicious is about sharing, you don't want to dump 400 new items on your network every day. I find it's much better to think really hard about what the most important thing my network needs to see today, and give them that one thing – otherwise the good stuff gets lost in the noise.

Minimising the amount of tagging also makes it easier to restrict the size of your tagonomy – which should make it easier for followers to find useful content (because e.g. what's the point of an RSS feed to a tag which is only used twice a year?)

I'm pleased someone else out there is using delicious. This is my account if you want a look:
http://delicious.com/hcwheurope

I'm experimenting with introducing specific environmentally-infleunced diseases, but that's looking like it will to bloat my tagonomy to an unmanageable level.

I've been using delicious for about a year and was having exactly the same problem with chaotic tag lists. It's only recently that I figured out what to do with the whole tag taxonomy problem (or is that “tagonomy”?).

All I do is try to restrict myself to a list of 20 (ish) “approved” tags, relating to the issues my environmental organisation works on. Since our topics interest are well-defined, and the people who follow us have specific areas of interest, it works OK.

So if you want to know about, say, PVC and phthalates and alternative plastics, you can follow the content I'm tagging [plastics], keeping on top of what we think are significant stories and studies (the 700-character description box is a great place for us to explain why we think the article or study is interesting).

I can use those feeds (in theory – not actually doing it yet) to automatically populate blog posts (those ever-useful five-item lists) to keep content rolling over in the sub-sections of our website – which happen to use the same issue division that I use with my tags.

I agree with minising the amouint of content to tag as well – since delicious is about sharing, you don't want to dump 400 new items on your network every day. I find it's much better to think really hard about what the most important thing my network needs to see today, and give them that one thing – otherwise the good stuff gets lost in the noise.

Minimising the amount of tagging also makes it easier to restrict the size of your tagonomy – which should make it easier for followers to find useful content (because e.g. what's the point of an RSS feed to a tag which is only used twice a year?)

I'm pleased someone else out there is using delicious. This is my account if you want a look:
http://delicious.com/hcwheurope

I'm experimenting with introducing specific environmentally-infleunced diseases, but that's looking like it will to bloat my tagonomy to an unmanageable level.

I've been using delicious for about a year and was having exactly the same problem with chaotic tag lists. It's only recently that I figured out what to do with the whole tag taxonomy problem (or is that “tagonomy”?).

All I do is try to restrict myself to a list of 20 (ish) “approved” tags, relating to the issues my environmental organisation works on. Since our topics interest are well-defined, and the people who follow us have specific areas of interest, it works OK.

So if you want to know about, say, PVC and phthalates and alternative plastics, you can follow the content I'm tagging [plastics], keeping on top of what we think are significant stories and studies (the 700-character description box is a great place for us to explain why we think the article or study is interesting).

I can use those feeds (in theory – not actually doing it yet) to automatically populate blog posts (those ever-useful five-item lists) to keep content rolling over in the sub-sections of our website – which happen to use the same issue division that I use with my tags.

I agree with minising the amouint of content to tag as well – since delicious is about sharing, you don't want to dump 400 new items on your network every day. I find it's much better to think really hard about what the most important thing my network needs to see today, and give them that one thing – otherwise the good stuff gets lost in the noise.

Minimising the amount of tagging also makes it easier to restrict the size of your tagonomy – which should make it easier for followers to find useful content (because e.g. what's the point of an RSS feed to a tag which is only used twice a year?)

I'm pleased someone else out there is using delicious. This is my account if you want a look:
http://delicious.com/hcwheurope

I'm experimenting with introducing specific environmentally-infleunced diseases, but that's looking like it will to bloat my tagonomy to an unmanageable level.

I've been using delicious for about a year and was having exactly the same problem with chaotic tag lists. It's only recently that I figured out what to do with the whole tag taxonomy problem (or is that “tagonomy”?).

All I do is try to restrict myself to a list of 20 (ish) “approved” tags, relating to the issues my environmental organisation works on. Since our topics interest are well-defined, and the people who follow us have specific areas of interest, it works OK.

So if you want to know about, say, PVC and phthalates and alternative plastics, you can follow the content I'm tagging [plastics], keeping on top of what we think are significant stories and studies (the 700-character description box is a great place for us to explain why we think the article or study is interesting).

I can use those feeds (in theory – not actually doing it yet) to automatically populate blog posts (those ever-useful five-item lists) to keep content rolling over in the sub-sections of our website – which happen to use the same issue division that I use with my tags.

I agree with minising the amouint of content to tag as well – since delicious is about sharing, you don't want to dump 400 new items on your network every day. I find it's much better to think really hard about what the most important thing my network needs to see today, and give them that one thing – otherwise the good stuff gets lost in the noise.

Minimising the amount of tagging also makes it easier to restrict the size of your tagonomy – which should make it easier for followers to find useful content (because e.g. what's the point of an RSS feed to a tag which is only used twice a year?)

I'm pleased someone else out there is using delicious. This is my account if you want a look:
http://delicious.com/hcwheurope

I'm experimenting with introducing specific environmentally-infleunced diseases, but that's looking like it will to bloat my tagonomy to an unmanageable level.

I've been using delicious for about a year and was having exactly the same problem with chaotic tag lists. It's only recently that I figured out what to do with the whole tag taxonomy problem (or is that “tagonomy”?).

All I do is try to restrict myself to a list of 20 (ish) “approved” tags, relating to the issues my environmental organisation works on. Since our topics interest are well-defined, and the people who follow us have specific areas of interest, it works OK.

So if you want to know about, say, PVC and phthalates and alternative plastics, you can follow the content I'm tagging [plastics], keeping on top of what we think are significant stories and studies (the 700-character description box is a great place for us to explain why we think the article or study is interesting).

I can use those feeds (in theory – not actually doing it yet) to automatically populate blog posts (those ever-useful five-item lists) to keep content rolling over in the sub-sections of our website – which happen to use the same issue division that I use with my tags.

I agree with minising the amouint of content to tag as well – since delicious is about sharing, you don't want to dump 400 new items on your network every day. I find it's much better to think really hard about what the most important thing my network needs to see today, and give them that one thing – otherwise the good stuff gets lost in the noise.

Minimising the amount of tagging also makes it easier to restrict the size of your tagonomy – which should make it easier for followers to find useful content (because e.g. what's the point of an RSS feed to a tag which is only used twice a year?)

I'm pleased someone else out there is using delicious. This is my account if you want a look:
http://delicious.com/hcwheurope

I'm experimenting with introducing specific environmentally-infleunced diseases, but that's looking like it will to bloat my tagonomy to an unmanageable level.

I've been using delicious for about a year and was having exactly the same problem with chaotic tag lists. It's only recently that I figured out what to do with the whole tag taxonomy problem (or is that “tagonomy”?).

All I do is try to restrict myself to a list of 20 (ish) “approved” tags, relating to the issues my environmental organisation works on. Since our topics interest are well-defined, and the people who follow us have specific areas of interest, it works OK.

So if you want to know about, say, PVC and phthalates and alternative plastics, you can follow the content I'm tagging [plastics], keeping on top of what we think are significant stories and studies (the 700-character description box is a great place for us to explain why we think the article or study is interesting).

I can use those feeds (in theory – not actually doing it yet) to automatically populate blog posts (those ever-useful five-item lists) to keep content rolling over in the sub-sections of our website – which happen to use the same issue division that I use with my tags.

I agree with minising the amouint of content to tag as well – since delicious is about sharing, you don't want to dump 400 new items on your network every day. I find it's much better to think really hard about what the most important thing my network needs to see today, and give them that one thing – otherwise the good stuff gets lost in the noise.

Minimising the amount of tagging also makes it easier to restrict the size of your tagonomy – which should make it easier for followers to find useful content (because e.g. what's the point of an RSS feed to a tag which is only used twice a year?)

I'm pleased someone else out there is using delicious. This is my account if you want a look:
http://delicious.com/hcwheurope

I'm experimenting with introducing specific environmentally-infleunced diseases, but that's looking like it will to bloat my tagonomy to an unmanageable level.

I've been using delicious for about a year and was having exactly the same problem with chaotic tag lists. It's only recently that I figured out what to do with the whole tag taxonomy problem (or is that “tagonomy”?).

All I do is try to restrict myself to a list of 20 (ish) “approved” tags, relating to the issues my environmental organisation works on. Since our topics interest are well-defined, and the people who follow us have specific areas of interest, it works OK.

So if you want to know about, say, PVC and phthalates and alternative plastics, you can follow the content I'm tagging [plastics], keeping on top of what we think are significant stories and studies (the 700-character description box is a great place for us to explain why we think the article or study is interesting).

I can use those feeds (in theory – not actually doing it yet) to automatically populate blog posts (those ever-useful five-item lists) to keep content rolling over in the sub-sections of our website – which happen to use the same issue division that I use with my tags.

I agree with minising the amouint of content to tag as well – since delicious is about sharing, you don't want to dump 400 new items on your network every day. I find it's much better to think really hard about what the most important thing my network needs to see today, and give them that one thing – otherwise the good stuff gets lost in the noise.

Minimising the amount of tagging also makes it easier to restrict the size of your tagonomy – which should make it easier for followers to find useful content (because e.g. what's the point of an RSS feed to a tag which is only used twice a year?)

I'm pleased someone else out there is using delicious. This is my account if you want a look:
http://delicious.com/hcwheurope

I'm experimenting with introducing specific environmentally-infleunced diseases, but that's looking like it will to bloat my tagonomy to an unmanageable level.

I've been using delicious for about a year and was having exactly the same problem with chaotic tag lists. It's only recently that I figured out what to do with the whole tag taxonomy problem (or is that “tagonomy”?).

All I do is try to restrict myself to a list of 20 (ish) “approved” tags, relating to the issues my environmental organisation works on. Since our topics interest are well-defined, and the people who follow us have specific areas of interest, it works OK.

So if you want to know about, say, PVC and phthalates and alternative plastics, you can follow the content I'm tagging [plastics], keeping on top of what we think are significant stories and studies (the 700-character description box is a great place for us to explain why we think the article or study is interesting).

I can use those feeds (in theory – not actually doing it yet) to automatically populate blog posts (those ever-useful five-item lists) to keep content rolling over in the sub-sections of our website – which happen to use the same issue division that I use with my tags.

I agree with minising the amouint of content to tag as well – since delicious is about sharing, you don't want to dump 400 new items on your network every day. I find it's much better to think really hard about what the most important thing my network needs to see today, and give them that one thing – otherwise the good stuff gets lost in the noise.

Minimising the amount of tagging also makes it easier to restrict the size of your tagonomy – which should make it easier for followers to find useful content (because e.g. what's the point of an RSS feed to a tag which is only used twice a year?)

I'm pleased someone else out there is using delicious. This is my account if you want a look:
http://delicious.com/hcwheurope

I'm experimenting with introducing specific environmentally-infleunced diseases, but that's looking like it will to bloat my tagonomy to an unmanageable level.

I've been using delicious for about a year and was having exactly the same problem with chaotic tag lists. It's only recently that I figured out what to do with the whole tag taxonomy problem (or is that “tagonomy”?).

All I do is try to restrict myself to a list of 20 (ish) “approved” tags, relating to the issues my environmental organisation works on. Since our topics interest are well-defined, and the people who follow us have specific areas of interest, it works OK.

So if you want to know about, say, PVC and phthalates and alternative plastics, you can follow the content I'm tagging [plastics], keeping on top of what we think are significant stories and studies (the 700-character description box is a great place for us to explain why we think the article or study is interesting).

I can use those feeds (in theory – not actually doing it yet) to automatically populate blog posts (those ever-useful five-item lists) to keep content rolling over in the sub-sections of our website – which happen to use the same issue division that I use with my tags.

I agree with minising the amouint of content to tag as well – since delicious is about sharing, you don't want to dump 400 new items on your network every day. I find it's much better to think really hard about what the most important thing my network needs to see today, and give them that one thing – otherwise the good stuff gets lost in the noise.

Minimising the amount of tagging also makes it easier to restrict the size of your tagonomy – which should make it easier for followers to find useful content (because e.g. what's the point of an RSS feed to a tag which is only used twice a year?)

I'm pleased someone else out there is using delicious. This is my account if you want a look:
http://delicious.com/hcwheurope

I'm experimenting with introducing specific environmentally-infleunced diseases, but that's looking like it will to bloat my tagonomy to an unmanageable level.

I've been using delicious for about a year and was having exactly the same problem with chaotic tag lists. It's only recently that I figured out what to do with the whole tag taxonomy problem (or is that “tagonomy”?).

All I do is try to restrict myself to a list of 20 (ish) “approved” tags, relating to the issues my environmental organisation works on. Since our topics interest are well-defined, and the people who follow us have specific areas of interest, it works OK.

So if you want to know about, say, PVC and phthalates and alternative plastics, you can follow the content I'm tagging [plastics], keeping on top of what we think are significant stories and studies (the 700-character description box is a great place for us to explain why we think the article or study is interesting).

I can use those feeds (in theory – not actually doing it yet) to automatically populate blog posts (those ever-useful five-item lists) to keep content rolling over in the sub-sections of our website – which happen to use the same issue division that I use with my tags.

I agree with minising the amouint of content to tag as well – since delicious is about sharing, you don't want to dump 400 new items on your network every day. I find it's much better to think really hard about what the most important thing my network needs to see today, and give them that one thing – otherwise the good stuff gets lost in the noise.

Minimising the amount of tagging also makes it easier to restrict the size of your tagonomy – which should make it easier for followers to find useful content (because e.g. what's the point of an RSS feed to a tag which is only used twice a year?)

I'm pleased someone else out there is using delicious. This is my account if you want a look:
http://delicious.com/hcwheurope

I'm experimenting with introducing specific environmentally-infleunced diseases, but that's looking like it will to bloat my tagonomy to an unmanageable level.

I've been using delicious for about a year and was having exactly the same problem with chaotic tag lists. It's only recently that I figured out what to do with the whole tag taxonomy problem (or is that “tagonomy”?).

All I do is try to restrict myself to a list of 20 (ish) “approved” tags, relating to the issues my environmental organisation works on. Since our topics interest are well-defined, and the people who follow us have specific areas of interest, it works OK.

So if you want to know about, say, PVC and phthalates and alternative plastics, you can follow the content I'm tagging [plastics], keeping on top of what we think are significant stories and studies (the 700-character description box is a great place for us to explain why we think the article or study is interesting).

I can use those feeds (in theory – not actually doing it yet) to automatically populate blog posts (those ever-useful five-item lists) to keep content rolling over in the sub-sections of our website – which happen to use the same issue division that I use with my tags.

I agree with minising the amouint of content to tag as well – since delicious is about sharing, you don't want to dump 400 new items on your network every day. I find it's much better to think really hard about what the most important thing my network needs to see today, and give them that one thing – otherwise the good stuff gets lost in the noise.

Minimising the amount of tagging also makes it easier to restrict the size of your tagonomy – which should make it easier for followers to find useful content (because e.g. what's the point of an RSS feed to a tag which is only used twice a year?)

I'm pleased someone else out there is using delicious. This is my account if you want a look:
http://delicious.com/hcwheurope

I'm experimenting with introducing specific environmentally-infleunced diseases, but that's looking like it will to bloat my tagonomy to an unmanageable level.

I've been using delicious for about a year and was having exactly the same problem with chaotic tag lists. It's only recently that I figured out what to do with the whole tag taxonomy problem (or is that “tagonomy”?).

All I do is try to restrict myself to a list of 20 (ish) “approved” tags, relating to the issues my environmental organisation works on. Since our topics interest are well-defined, and the people who follow us have specific areas of interest, it works OK.

So if you want to know about, say, PVC and phthalates and alternative plastics, you can follow the content I'm tagging [plastics], keeping on top of what we think are significant stories and studies (the 700-character description box is a great place for us to explain why we think the article or study is interesting).

I can use those feeds (in theory – not actually doing it yet) to automatically populate blog posts (those ever-useful five-item lists) to keep content rolling over in the sub-sections of our website – which happen to use the same issue division that I use with my tags.

I agree with minising the amouint of content to tag as well – since delicious is about sharing, you don't want to dump 400 new items on your network every day. I find it's much better to think really hard about what the most important thing my network needs to see today, and give them that one thing – otherwise the good stuff gets lost in the noise.

Minimising the amount of tagging also makes it easier to restrict the size of your tagonomy – which should make it easier for followers to find useful content (because e.g. what's the point of an RSS feed to a tag which is only used twice a year?)

I'm pleased someone else out there is using delicious. This is my account if you want a look:
http://delicious.com/hcwheurope

I'm experimenting with introducing specific environmentally-infleunced diseases, but that's looking like it will to bloat my tagonomy to an unmanageable level.

I've been using delicious for about a year and was having exactly the same problem with chaotic tag lists. It's only recently that I figured out what to do with the whole tag taxonomy problem (or is that “tagonomy”?).

All I do is try to restrict myself to a list of 20 (ish) “approved” tags, relating to the issues my environmental organisation works on. Since our topics interest are well-defined, and the people who follow us have specific areas of interest, it works OK.

So if you want to know about, say, PVC and phthalates and alternative plastics, you can follow the content I'm tagging [plastics], keeping on top of what we think are significant stories and studies (the 700-character description box is a great place for us to explain why we think the article or study is interesting).

I can use those feeds (in theory – not actually doing it yet) to automatically populate blog posts (those ever-useful five-item lists) to keep content rolling over in the sub-sections of our website – which happen to use the same issue division that I use with my tags.

I agree with minising the amouint of content to tag as well – since delicious is about sharing, you don't want to dump 400 new items on your network every day. I find it's much better to think really hard about what the most important thing my network needs to see today, and give them that one thing – otherwise the good stuff gets lost in the noise.

Minimising the amount of tagging also makes it easier to restrict the size of your tagonomy – which should make it easier for followers to find useful content (because e.g. what's the point of an RSS feed to a tag which is only used twice a year?)

I'm pleased someone else out there is using delicious. This is my account if you want a look:
http://delicious.com/hcwheurope

I'm experimenting with introducing specific environmentally-infleunced diseases, but that's looking like it will to bloat my tagonomy to an unmanageable level.

Awesome thoughts, Paul. Thanks for the additional insight. Glad to know someone else is A) Experiencing similar problems and B) Coming up with similar solutions. And thanks for sharing your account. I'll go check 'er out!

Awesome thoughts, Paul. Thanks for the additional insight. Glad to know someone else is A) Experiencing similar problems and B) Coming up with similar solutions. And thanks for sharing your account. I'll go check 'er out!

Awesome thoughts, Paul. Thanks for the additional insight. Glad to know someone else is A) Experiencing similar problems and B) Coming up with similar solutions. And thanks for sharing your account. I'll go check 'er out!

Awesome thoughts, Paul. Thanks for the additional insight. Glad to know someone else is A) Experiencing similar problems and B) Coming up with similar solutions. And thanks for sharing your account. I'll go check 'er out!

Awesome thoughts, Paul. Thanks for the additional insight. Glad to know someone else is A) Experiencing similar problems and B) Coming up with similar solutions. And thanks for sharing your account. I'll go check 'er out!

Awesome thoughts, Paul. Thanks for the additional insight. Glad to know someone else is A) Experiencing similar problems and B) Coming up with similar solutions. And thanks for sharing your account. I'll go check 'er out!

Awesome thoughts, Paul. Thanks for the additional insight. Glad to know someone else is A) Experiencing similar problems and B) Coming up with similar solutions. And thanks for sharing your account. I'll go check 'er out!

Awesome thoughts, Paul. Thanks for the additional insight. Glad to know someone else is A) Experiencing similar problems and B) Coming up with similar solutions. And thanks for sharing your account. I'll go check 'er out!

Awesome thoughts, Paul. Thanks for the additional insight. Glad to know someone else is A) Experiencing similar problems and B) Coming up with similar solutions. And thanks for sharing your account. I'll go check 'er out!

Awesome thoughts, Paul. Thanks for the additional insight. Glad to know someone else is A) Experiencing similar problems and B) Coming up with similar solutions. And thanks for sharing your account. I'll go check 'er out!

Awesome thoughts, Paul. Thanks for the additional insight. Glad to know someone else is A) Experiencing similar problems and B) Coming up with similar solutions. And thanks for sharing your account. I'll go check 'er out!

Awesome thoughts, Paul. Thanks for the additional insight. Glad to know someone else is A) Experiencing similar problems and B) Coming up with similar solutions. And thanks for sharing your account. I'll go check 'er out!

Awesome thoughts, Paul. Thanks for the additional insight. Glad to know someone else is A) Experiencing similar problems and B) Coming up with similar solutions. And thanks for sharing your account. I'll go check 'er out!

Awesome thoughts, Paul. Thanks for the additional insight. Glad to know someone else is A) Experiencing similar problems and B) Coming up with similar solutions. And thanks for sharing your account. I'll go check 'er out!

Awesome thoughts, Paul. Thanks for the additional insight. Glad to know someone else is A) Experiencing similar problems and B) Coming up with similar solutions. And thanks for sharing your account. I'll go check 'er out!

Awesome thoughts, Paul. Thanks for the additional insight. Glad to know someone else is A) Experiencing similar problems and B) Coming up with similar solutions. And thanks for sharing your account. I'll go check 'er out!

Awesome thoughts, Paul. Thanks for the additional insight. Glad to know someone else is A) Experiencing similar problems and B) Coming up with similar solutions. And thanks for sharing your account. I'll go check 'er out!

Awesome thoughts, Paul. Thanks for the additional insight. Glad to know someone else is A) Experiencing similar problems and B) Coming up with similar solutions. And thanks for sharing your account. I'll go check 'er out!

Awesome thoughts, Paul. Thanks for the additional insight. Glad to know someone else is A) Experiencing similar problems and B) Coming up with similar solutions. And thanks for sharing your account. I'll go check 'er out!

Awesome thoughts, Paul. Thanks for the additional insight. Glad to know someone else is A) Experiencing similar problems and B) Coming up with similar solutions. And thanks for sharing your account. I'll go check 'er out!

Awesome thoughts, Paul. Thanks for the additional insight. Glad to know someone else is A) Experiencing similar problems and B) Coming up with similar solutions. And thanks for sharing your account. I'll go check 'er out!

Awesome thoughts, Paul. Thanks for the additional insight. Glad to know someone else is A) Experiencing similar problems and B) Coming up with similar solutions. And thanks for sharing your account. I'll go check 'er out!

Awesome thoughts, Paul. Thanks for the additional insight. Glad to know someone else is A) Experiencing similar problems and B) Coming up with similar solutions. And thanks for sharing your account. I'll go check 'er out!

Awesome thoughts, Paul. Thanks for the additional insight. Glad to know someone else is A) Experiencing similar problems and B) Coming up with similar solutions. And thanks for sharing your account. I'll go check 'er out!

Awesome thoughts, Paul. Thanks for the additional insight. Glad to know someone else is A) Experiencing similar problems and B) Coming up with similar solutions. And thanks for sharing your account. I'll go check 'er out!

Awesome thoughts, Paul. Thanks for the additional insight. Glad to know someone else is A) Experiencing similar problems and B) Coming up with similar solutions. And thanks for sharing your account. I'll go check 'er out!

Awesome thoughts, Paul. Thanks for the additional insight. Glad to know someone else is A) Experiencing similar problems and B) Coming up with similar solutions. And thanks for sharing your account. I'll go check 'er out!

Awesome thoughts, Paul. Thanks for the additional insight. Glad to know someone else is A) Experiencing similar problems and B) Coming up with similar solutions. And thanks for sharing your account. I'll go check 'er out!

Awesome thoughts, Paul. Thanks for the additional insight. Glad to know someone else is A) Experiencing similar problems and B) Coming up with similar solutions. And thanks for sharing your account. I'll go check 'er out!

Awesome thoughts, Paul. Thanks for the additional insight. Glad to know someone else is A) Experiencing similar problems and B) Coming up with similar solutions. And thanks for sharing your account. I'll go check 'er out!

Awesome thoughts, Paul. Thanks for the additional insight. Glad to know someone else is A) Experiencing similar problems and B) Coming up with similar solutions. And thanks for sharing your account. I'll go check 'er out!

Awesome thoughts, Paul. Thanks for the additional insight. Glad to know someone else is A) Experiencing similar problems and B) Coming up with similar solutions. And thanks for sharing your account. I'll go check 'er out!

Awesome thoughts, Paul. Thanks for the additional insight. Glad to know someone else is A) Experiencing similar problems and B) Coming up with similar solutions. And thanks for sharing your account. I'll go check 'er out!

It's always fun to read about other people's Delicious systems – thanks for writing about yours. A long time ago I established my “tag vocabulary” after a few hundred bookmarks of off-the-cuff tagging; I printed out my list of tags and circled them to make sensible bundles, crossed out dumb tags, etc., and then modified the bookmarks. It was a little silly but my system still works for me.

There was a great long discussion on the Delicious forum this summer about how people tag and why: The Art of Tagging: conventions and strategies.

It's always fun to read about other people's Delicious systems – thanks for writing about yours. A long time ago I established my “tag vocabulary” after a few hundred bookmarks of off-the-cuff tagging; I printed out my list of tags and circled them to make sensible bundles, crossed out dumb tags, etc., and then modified the bookmarks. It was a little silly but my system still works for me.

There was a great long discussion on the Delicious forum this summer about how people tag and why: The Art of Tagging: conventions and strategies.

It's always fun to read about other people's Delicious systems – thanks for writing about yours. A long time ago I established my “tag vocabulary” after a few hundred bookmarks of off-the-cuff tagging; I printed out my list of tags and circled them to make sensible bundles, crossed out dumb tags, etc., and then modified the bookmarks. It was a little silly but my system still works for me.

There was a great long discussion on the Delicious forum this summer about how people tag and why: The Art of Tagging: conventions and strategies.

It's always fun to read about other people's Delicious systems – thanks for writing about yours. A long time ago I established my “tag vocabulary” after a few hundred bookmarks of off-the-cuff tagging; I printed out my list of tags and circled them to make sensible bundles, crossed out dumb tags, etc., and then modified the bookmarks. It was a little silly but my system still works for me.

There was a great long discussion on the Delicious forum this summer about how people tag and why: The Art of Tagging: conventions and strategies.

It's always fun to read about other people's Delicious systems – thanks for writing about yours. A long time ago I established my “tag vocabulary” after a few hundred bookmarks of off-the-cuff tagging; I printed out my list of tags and circled them to make sensible bundles, crossed out dumb tags, etc., and then modified the bookmarks. It was a little silly but my system still works for me.

There was a great long discussion on the Delicious forum this summer about how people tag and why: The Art of Tagging: conventions and strategies.

It's always fun to read about other people's Delicious systems – thanks for writing about yours. A long time ago I established my “tag vocabulary” after a few hundred bookmarks of off-the-cuff tagging; I printed out my list of tags and circled them to make sensible bundles, crossed out dumb tags, etc., and then modified the bookmarks. It was a little silly but my system still works for me.

There was a great long discussion on the Delicious forum this summer about how people tag and why: The Art of Tagging: conventions and strategies.

It's always fun to read about other people's Delicious systems – thanks for writing about yours. A long time ago I established my “tag vocabulary” after a few hundred bookmarks of off-the-cuff tagging; I printed out my list of tags and circled them to make sensible bundles, crossed out dumb tags, etc., and then modified the bookmarks. It was a little silly but my system still works for me.

There was a great long discussion on the Delicious forum this summer about how people tag and why: The Art of Tagging: conventions and strategies.

It's always fun to read about other people's Delicious systems – thanks for writing about yours. A long time ago I established my “tag vocabulary” after a few hundred bookmarks of off-the-cuff tagging; I printed out my list of tags and circled them to make sensible bundles, crossed out dumb tags, etc., and then modified the bookmarks. It was a little silly but my system still works for me.

There was a great long discussion on the Delicious forum this summer about how people tag and why: The Art of Tagging: conventions and strategies.

It's always fun to read about other people's Delicious systems – thanks for writing about yours. A long time ago I established my “tag vocabulary” after a few hundred bookmarks of off-the-cuff tagging; I printed out my list of tags and circled them to make sensible bundles, crossed out dumb tags, etc., and then modified the bookmarks. It was a little silly but my system still works for me.

There was a great long discussion on the Delicious forum this summer about how people tag and why: The Art of Tagging: conventions and strategies.

It's always fun to read about other people's Delicious systems – thanks for writing about yours. A long time ago I established my “tag vocabulary” after a few hundred bookmarks of off-the-cuff tagging; I printed out my list of tags and circled them to make sensible bundles, crossed out dumb tags, etc., and then modified the bookmarks. It was a little silly but my system still works for me.

There was a great long discussion on the Delicious forum this summer about how people tag and why: The Art of Tagging: conventions and strategies.

It's always fun to read about other people's Delicious systems – thanks for writing about yours. A long time ago I established my “tag vocabulary” after a few hundred bookmarks of off-the-cuff tagging; I printed out my list of tags and circled them to make sensible bundles, crossed out dumb tags, etc., and then modified the bookmarks. It was a little silly but my system still works for me.

There was a great long discussion on the Delicious forum this summer about how people tag and why: The Art of Tagging: conventions and strategies.

It's always fun to read about other people's Delicious systems – thanks for writing about yours. A long time ago I established my “tag vocabulary” after a few hundred bookmarks of off-the-cuff tagging; I printed out my list of tags and circled them to make sensible bundles, crossed out dumb tags, etc., and then modified the bookmarks. It was a little silly but my system still works for me.

There was a great long discussion on the Delicious forum this summer about how people tag and why: The Art of Tagging: conventions and strategies.

It's always fun to read about other people's Delicious systems – thanks for writing about yours. A long time ago I established my “tag vocabulary” after a few hundred bookmarks of off-the-cuff tagging; I printed out my list of tags and circled them to make sensible bundles, crossed out dumb tags, etc., and then modified the bookmarks. It was a little silly but my system still works for me.

There was a great long discussion on the Delicious forum this summer about how people tag and why: The Art of Tagging: conventions and strategies.

It's always fun to read about other people's Delicious systems – thanks for writing about yours. A long time ago I established my “tag vocabulary” after a few hundred bookmarks of off-the-cuff tagging; I printed out my list of tags and circled them to make sensible bundles, crossed out dumb tags, etc., and then modified the bookmarks. It was a little silly but my system still works for me.

There was a great long discussion on the Delicious forum this summer about how people tag and why: The Art of Tagging: conventions and strategies.

It's always fun to read about other people's Delicious systems – thanks for writing about yours. A long time ago I established my “tag vocabulary” after a few hundred bookmarks of off-the-cuff tagging; I printed out my list of tags and circled them to make sensible bundles, crossed out dumb tags, etc., and then modified the bookmarks. It was a little silly but my system still works for me.

There was a great long discussion on the Delicious forum this summer about how people tag and why: The Art of Tagging: conventions and strategies.

It's always fun to read about other people's Delicious systems – thanks for writing about yours. A long time ago I established my “tag vocabulary” after a few hundred bookmarks of off-the-cuff tagging; I printed out my list of tags and circled them to make sensible bundles, crossed out dumb tags, etc., and then modified the bookmarks. It was a little silly but my system still works for me.

There was a great long discussion on the Delicious forum this summer about how people tag and why: The Art of Tagging: conventions and strategies.

It's always fun to read about other people's Delicious systems – thanks for writing about yours. A long time ago I established my “tag vocabulary” after a few hundred bookmarks of off-the-cuff tagging; I printed out my list of tags and circled them to make sensible bundles, crossed out dumb tags, etc., and then modified the bookmarks. It was a little silly but my system still works for me.

There was a great long discussion on the Delicious forum this summer about how people tag and why: The Art of Tagging: conventions and strategies.

It's always fun to read about other people's Delicious systems – thanks for writing about yours. A long time ago I established my “tag vocabulary” after a few hundred bookmarks of off-the-cuff tagging; I printed out my list of tags and circled them to make sensible bundles, crossed out dumb tags, etc., and then modified the bookmarks. It was a little silly but my system still works for me.

There was a great long discussion on the Delicious forum this summer about how people tag and why: The Art of Tagging: conventions and strategies.

It's always fun to read about other people's Delicious systems – thanks for writing about yours. A long time ago I established my “tag vocabulary” after a few hundred bookmarks of off-the-cuff tagging; I printed out my list of tags and circled them to make sensible bundles, crossed out dumb tags, etc., and then modified the bookmarks. It was a little silly but my system still works for me.

There was a great long discussion on the Delicious forum this summer about how people tag and why: The Art of Tagging: conventions and strategies.

It's always fun to read about other people's Delicious systems – thanks for writing about yours. A long time ago I established my “tag vocabulary” after a few hundred bookmarks of off-the-cuff tagging; I printed out my list of tags and circled them to make sensible bundles, crossed out dumb tags, etc., and then modified the bookmarks. It was a little silly but my system still works for me.

There was a great long discussion on the Delicious forum this summer about how people tag and why: The Art of Tagging: conventions and strategies.

It's always fun to read about other people's Delicious systems – thanks for writing about yours. A long time ago I established my “tag vocabulary” after a few hundred bookmarks of off-the-cuff tagging; I printed out my list of tags and circled them to make sensible bundles, crossed out dumb tags, etc., and then modified the bookmarks. It was a little silly but my system still works for me.

There was a great long discussion on the Delicious forum this summer about how people tag and why: The Art of Tagging: conventions and strategies.

It's always fun to read about other people's Delicious systems – thanks for writing about yours. A long time ago I established my “tag vocabulary” after a few hundred bookmarks of off-the-cuff tagging; I printed out my list of tags and circled them to make sensible bundles, crossed out dumb tags, etc., and then modified the bookmarks. It was a little silly but my system still works for me.

There was a great long discussion on the Delicious forum this summer about how people tag and why: The Art of Tagging: conventions and strategies.

It's always fun to read about other people's Delicious systems – thanks for writing about yours. A long time ago I established my “tag vocabulary” after a few hundred bookmarks of off-the-cuff tagging; I printed out my list of tags and circled them to make sensible bundles, crossed out dumb tags, etc., and then modified the bookmarks. It was a little silly but my system still works for me.

There was a great long discussion on the Delicious forum this summer about how people tag and why: The Art of Tagging: conventions and strategies.

It's always fun to read about other people's Delicious systems – thanks for writing about yours. A long time ago I established my “tag vocabulary” after a few hundred bookmarks of off-the-cuff tagging; I printed out my list of tags and circled them to make sensible bundles, crossed out dumb tags, etc., and then modified the bookmarks. It was a little silly but my system still works for me.

There was a great long discussion on the Delicious forum this summer about how people tag and why: The Art of Tagging: conventions and strategies.

It's always fun to read about other people's Delicious systems – thanks for writing about yours. A long time ago I established my “tag vocabulary” after a few hundred bookmarks of off-the-cuff tagging; I printed out my list of tags and circled them to make sensible bundles, crossed out dumb tags, etc., and then modified the bookmarks. It was a little silly but my system still works for me.

There was a great long discussion on the Delicious forum this summer about how people tag and why: The Art of Tagging: conventions and strategies.

It's always fun to read about other people's Delicious systems – thanks for writing about yours. A long time ago I established my “tag vocabulary” after a few hundred bookmarks of off-the-cuff tagging; I printed out my list of tags and circled them to make sensible bundles, crossed out dumb tags, etc., and then modified the bookmarks. It was a little silly but my system still works for me.

There was a great long discussion on the Delicious forum this summer about how people tag and why: The Art of Tagging: conventions and strategies.

It's always fun to read about other people's Delicious systems – thanks for writing about yours. A long time ago I established my “tag vocabulary” after a few hundred bookmarks of off-the-cuff tagging; I printed out my list of tags and circled them to make sensible bundles, crossed out dumb tags, etc., and then modified the bookmarks. It was a little silly but my system still works for me.

There was a great long discussion on the Delicious forum this summer about how people tag and why: The Art of Tagging: conventions and strategies.

It's always fun to read about other people's Delicious systems – thanks for writing about yours. A long time ago I established my “tag vocabulary” after a few hundred bookmarks of off-the-cuff tagging; I printed out my list of tags and circled them to make sensible bundles, crossed out dumb tags, etc., and then modified the bookmarks. It was a little silly but my system still works for me.

There was a great long discussion on the Delicious forum this summer about how people tag and why: The Art of Tagging: conventions and strategies.

It's always fun to read about other people's Delicious systems – thanks for writing about yours. A long time ago I established my “tag vocabulary” after a few hundred bookmarks of off-the-cuff tagging; I printed out my list of tags and circled them to make sensible bundles, crossed out dumb tags, etc., and then modified the bookmarks. It was a little silly but my system still works for me.

There was a great long discussion on the Delicious forum this summer about how people tag and why: The Art of Tagging: conventions and strategies.

It's always fun to read about other people's Delicious systems – thanks for writing about yours. A long time ago I established my “tag vocabulary” after a few hundred bookmarks of off-the-cuff tagging; I printed out my list of tags and circled them to make sensible bundles, crossed out dumb tags, etc., and then modified the bookmarks. It was a little silly but my system still works for me.

There was a great long discussion on the Delicious forum this summer about how people tag and why: The Art of Tagging: conventions and strategies.

It's always fun to read about other people's Delicious systems – thanks for writing about yours. A long time ago I established my “tag vocabulary” after a few hundred bookmarks of off-the-cuff tagging; I printed out my list of tags and circled them to make sensible bundles, crossed out dumb tags, etc., and then modified the bookmarks. It was a little silly but my system still works for me.

There was a great long discussion on the Delicious forum this summer about how people tag and why: The Art of Tagging: conventions and strategies.

It's always fun to read about other people's Delicious systems – thanks for writing about yours. A long time ago I established my “tag vocabulary” after a few hundred bookmarks of off-the-cuff tagging; I printed out my list of tags and circled them to make sensible bundles, crossed out dumb tags, etc., and then modified the bookmarks. It was a little silly but my system still works for me.

There was a great long discussion on the Delicious forum this summer about how people tag and why: The Art of Tagging: conventions and strategies.

It's always fun to read about other people's Delicious systems – thanks for writing about yours. A long time ago I established my “tag vocabulary” after a few hundred bookmarks of off-the-cuff tagging; I printed out my list of tags and circled them to make sensible bundles, crossed out dumb tags, etc., and then modified the bookmarks. It was a little silly but my system still works for me.

There was a great long discussion on the Delicious forum this summer about how people tag and why: The Art of Tagging: conventions and strategies.

Very helpful post here, Jason, and a timely one, too. (I've also been kicking around an idea for a post on delicious for a week or two, so I'll make sure to write about this from a different angle).

Delicious bookmarks are most valuable for me when I'm doing research for or preparing a presentation. I'll create a unique tag for that presentation (like Blogging101), and then tag all relevant content that way for a while (assuming I have enough notice ahead of the presentation). As I'm getting my remarks/slides ready, I can review all Blogging101-tagged content and organize my thoughts.

Like you, Jason, my tags are generally a mess. I have, gulp, 447 of them, and most have 5 or fewer items. How about a challenge: Let's see which of us can reorganize all our tags first? I'm making that a goal for January.

Bryan | @BryanPerson

Very helpful post here, Jason, and a timely one, too. (I've also been kicking around an idea for a post on delicious for a week or two, so I'll make sure to write about this from a different angle).

Delicious bookmarks are most valuable for me when I'm doing research for or preparing a presentation. I'll create a unique tag for that presentation (like Blogging101), and then tag all relevant content that way for a while (assuming I have enough notice ahead of the presentation). As I'm getting my remarks/slides ready, I can review all Blogging101-tagged content and organize my thoughts.

Like you, Jason, my tags are generally a mess. I have, gulp, 447 of them, and most have 5 or fewer items. How about a challenge: Let's see which of us can reorganize all our tags first? I'm making that a goal for January.

Bryan | @BryanPerson

Very helpful post here, Jason, and a timely one, too. (I've also been kicking around an idea for a post on delicious for a week or two, so I'll make sure to write about this from a different angle).

Delicious bookmarks are most valuable for me when I'm doing research for or preparing a presentation. I'll create a unique tag for that presentation (like Blogging101), and then tag all relevant content that way for a while (assuming I have enough notice ahead of the presentation). As I'm getting my remarks/slides ready, I can review all Blogging101-tagged content and organize my thoughts.

Like you, Jason, my tags are generally a mess. I have, gulp, 447 of them, and most have 5 or fewer items. How about a challenge: Let's see which of us can reorganize all our tags first? I'm making that a goal for January.

Bryan | @BryanPerson

Very helpful post here, Jason, and a timely one, too. (I've also been kicking around an idea for a post on delicious for a week or two, so I'll make sure to write about this from a different angle).

Delicious bookmarks are most valuable for me when I'm doing research for or preparing a presentation. I'll create a unique tag for that presentation (like Blogging101), and then tag all relevant content that way for a while (assuming I have enough notice ahead of the presentation). As I'm getting my remarks/slides ready, I can review all Blogging101-tagged content and organize my thoughts.

Like you, Jason, my tags are generally a mess. I have, gulp, 447 of them, and most have 5 or fewer items. How about a challenge: Let's see which of us can reorganize all our tags first? I'm making that a goal for January.

Bryan | @BryanPerson

Very helpful post here, Jason, and a timely one, too. (I've also been kicking around an idea for a post on delicious for a week or two, so I'll make sure to write about this from a different angle).

Delicious bookmarks are most valuable for me when I'm doing research for or preparing a presentation. I'll create a unique tag for that presentation (like Blogging101), and then tag all relevant content that way for a while (assuming I have enough notice ahead of the presentation). As I'm getting my remarks/slides ready, I can review all Blogging101-tagged content and organize my thoughts.

Like you, Jason, my tags are generally a mess. I have, gulp, 447 of them, and most have 5 or fewer items. How about a challenge: Let's see which of us can reorganize all our tags first? I'm making that a goal for January.

Bryan | @BryanPerson

Very helpful post here, Jason, and a timely one, too. (I've also been kicking around an idea for a post on delicious for a week or two, so I'll make sure to write about this from a different angle).

Delicious bookmarks are most valuable for me when I'm doing research for or preparing a presentation. I'll create a unique tag for that presentation (like Blogging101), and then tag all relevant content that way for a while (assuming I have enough notice ahead of the presentation). As I'm getting my remarks/slides ready, I can review all Blogging101-tagged content and organize my thoughts.

Like you, Jason, my tags are generally a mess. I have, gulp, 447 of them, and most have 5 or fewer items. How about a challenge: Let's see which of us can reorganize all our tags first? I'm making that a goal for January.

Bryan | @BryanPerson

Very helpful post here, Jason, and a timely one, too. (I've also been kicking around an idea for a post on delicious for a week or two, so I'll make sure to write about this from a different angle).

Delicious bookmarks are most valuable for me when I'm doing research for or preparing a presentation. I'll create a unique tag for that presentation (like Blogging101), and then tag all relevant content that way for a while (assuming I have enough notice ahead of the presentation). As I'm getting my remarks/slides ready, I can review all Blogging101-tagged content and organize my thoughts.

Like you, Jason, my tags are generally a mess. I have, gulp, 447 of them, and most have 5 or fewer items. How about a challenge: Let's see which of us can reorganize all our tags first? I'm making that a goal for January.

Bryan | @BryanPerson

Very helpful post here, Jason, and a timely one, too. (I've also been kicking around an idea for a post on delicious for a week or two, so I'll make sure to write about this from a different angle).

Delicious bookmarks are most valuable for me when I'm doing research for or preparing a presentation. I'll create a unique tag for that presentation (like Blogging101), and then tag all relevant content that way for a while (assuming I have enough notice ahead of the presentation). As I'm getting my remarks/slides ready, I can review all Blogging101-tagged content and organize my thoughts.

Like you, Jason, my tags are generally a mess. I have, gulp, 447 of them, and most have 5 or fewer items. How about a challenge: Let's see which of us can reorganize all our tags first? I'm making that a goal for January.

Bryan | @BryanPerson

Very helpful post here, Jason, and a timely one, too. (I've also been kicking around an idea for a post on delicious for a week or two, so I'll make sure to write about this from a different angle).

Delicious bookmarks are most valuable for me when I'm doing research for or preparing a presentation. I'll create a unique tag for that presentation (like Blogging101), and then tag all relevant content that way for a while (assuming I have enough notice ahead of the presentation). As I'm getting my remarks/slides ready, I can review all Blogging101-tagged content and organize my thoughts.

Like you, Jason, my tags are generally a mess. I have, gulp, 447 of them, and most have 5 or fewer items. How about a challenge: Let's see which of us can reorganize all our tags first? I'm making that a goal for January.

Bryan | @BryanPerson

Very helpful post here, Jason, and a timely one, too. (I've also been kicking around an idea for a post on delicious for a week or two, so I'll make sure to write about this from a different angle).

Delicious bookmarks are most valuable for me when I'm doing research for or preparing a presentation. I'll create a unique tag for that presentation (like Blogging101), and then tag all relevant content that way for a while (assuming I have enough notice ahead of the presentation). As I'm getting my remarks/slides ready, I can review all Blogging101-tagged content and organize my thoughts.

Like you, Jason, my tags are generally a mess. I have, gulp, 447 of them, and most have 5 or fewer items. How about a challenge: Let's see which of us can reorganize all our tags first? I'm making that a goal for January.

Bryan | @BryanPerson

Very helpful post here, Jason, and a timely one, too. (I've also been kicking around an idea for a post on delicious for a week or two, so I'll make sure to write about this from a different angle).

Delicious bookmarks are most valuable for me when I'm doing research for or preparing a presentation. I'll create a unique tag for that presentation (like Blogging101), and then tag all relevant content that way for a while (assuming I have enough notice ahead of the presentation). As I'm getting my remarks/slides ready, I can review all Blogging101-tagged content and organize my thoughts.

Like you, Jason, my tags are generally a mess. I have, gulp, 447 of them, and most have 5 or fewer items. How about a challenge: Let's see which of us can reorganize all our tags first? I'm making that a goal for January.

Bryan | @BryanPerson

Very helpful post here, Jason, and a timely one, too. (I've also been kicking around an idea for a post on delicious for a week or two, so I'll make sure to write about this from a different angle).

Delicious bookmarks are most valuable for me when I'm doing research for or preparing a presentation. I'll create a unique tag for that presentation (like Blogging101), and then tag all relevant content that way for a while (assuming I have enough notice ahead of the presentation). As I'm getting my remarks/slides ready, I can review all Blogging101-tagged content and organize my thoughts.

Like you, Jason, my tags are generally a mess. I have, gulp, 447 of them, and most have 5 or fewer items. How about a challenge: Let's see which of us can reorganize all our tags first? I'm making that a goal for January.

Bryan | @BryanPerson

Very helpful post here, Jason, and a timely one, too. (I've also been kicking around an idea for a post on delicious for a week or two, so I'll make sure to write about this from a different angle).

Delicious bookmarks are most valuable for me when I'm doing research for or preparing a presentation. I'll create a unique tag for that presentation (like Blogging101), and then tag all relevant content that way for a while (assuming I have enough notice ahead of the presentation). As I'm getting my remarks/slides ready, I can review all Blogging101-tagged content and organize my thoughts.

Like you, Jason, my tags are generally a mess. I have, gulp, 447 of them, and most have 5 or fewer items. How about a challenge: Let's see which of us can reorganize all our tags first? I'm making that a goal for January.

Bryan | @BryanPerson

Very helpful post here, Jason, and a timely one, too. (I've also been kicking around an idea for a post on delicious for a week or two, so I'll make sure to write about this from a different angle).

Delicious bookmarks are most valuable for me when I'm doing research for or preparing a presentation. I'll create a unique tag for that presentation (like Blogging101), and then tag all relevant content that way for a while (assuming I have enough notice ahead of the presentation). As I'm getting my remarks/slides ready, I can review all Blogging101-tagged content and organize my thoughts.

Like you, Jason, my tags are generally a mess. I have, gulp, 447 of them, and most have 5 or fewer items. How about a challenge: Let's see which of us can reorganize all our tags first? I'm making that a goal for January.

Bryan | @BryanPerson

Very helpful post here, Jason, and a timely one, too. (I've also been kicking around an idea for a post on delicious for a week or two, so I'll make sure to write about this from a different angle).

Delicious bookmarks are most valuable for me when I'm doing research for or preparing a presentation. I'll create a unique tag for that presentation (like Blogging101), and then tag all relevant content that way for a while (assuming I have enough notice ahead of the presentation). As I'm getting my remarks/slides ready, I can review all Blogging101-tagged content and organize my thoughts.

Like you, Jason, my tags are generally a mess. I have, gulp, 447 of them, and most have 5 or fewer items. How about a challenge: Let's see which of us can reorganize all our tags first? I'm making that a goal for January.

Bryan | @BryanPerson

Very helpful post here, Jason, and a timely one, too. (I've also been kicking around an idea for a post on delicious for a week or two, so I'll make sure to write about this from a different angle).

Delicious bookmarks are most valuable for me when I'm doing research for or preparing a presentation. I'll create a unique tag for that presentation (like Blogging101), and then tag all relevant content that way for a while (assuming I have enough notice ahead of the presentation). As I'm getting my remarks/slides ready, I can review all Blogging101-tagged content and organize my thoughts.

Like you, Jason, my tags are generally a mess. I have, gulp, 447 of them, and most have 5 or fewer items. How about a challenge: Let's see which of us can reorganize all our tags first? I'm making that a goal for January.

Bryan | @BryanPerson

Very helpful post here, Jason, and a timely one, too. (I've also been kicking around an idea for a post on delicious for a week or two, so I'll make sure to write about this from a different angle).

Delicious bookmarks are most valuable for me when I'm doing research for or preparing a presentation. I'll create a unique tag for that presentation (like Blogging101), and then tag all relevant content that way for a while (assuming I have enough notice ahead of the presentation). As I'm getting my remarks/slides ready, I can review all Blogging101-tagged content and organize my thoughts.

Like you, Jason, my tags are generally a mess. I have, gulp, 447 of them, and most have 5 or fewer items. How about a challenge: Let's see which of us can reorganize all our tags first? I'm making that a goal for January.

Bryan | @BryanPerson

Very helpful post here, Jason, and a timely one, too. (I've also been kicking around an idea for a post on delicious for a week or two, so I'll make sure to write about this from a different angle).

Delicious bookmarks are most valuable for me when I'm doing research for or preparing a presentation. I'll create a unique tag for that presentation (like Blogging101), and then tag all relevant content that way for a while (assuming I have enough notice ahead of the presentation). As I'm getting my remarks/slides ready, I can review all Blogging101-tagged content and organize my thoughts.

Like you, Jason, my tags are generally a mess. I have, gulp, 447 of them, and most have 5 or fewer items. How about a challenge: Let's see which of us can reorganize all our tags first? I'm making that a goal for January.

Bryan | @BryanPerson

Very helpful post here, Jason, and a timely one, too. (I've also been kicking around an idea for a post on delicious for a week or two, so I'll make sure to write about this from a different angle).

Delicious bookmarks are most valuable for me when I'm doing research for or preparing a presentation. I'll create a unique tag for that presentation (like Blogging101), and then tag all relevant content that way for a while (assuming I have enough notice ahead of the presentation). As I'm getting my remarks/slides ready, I can review all Blogging101-tagged content and organize my thoughts.

Like you, Jason, my tags are generally a mess. I have, gulp, 447 of them, and most have 5 or fewer items. How about a challenge: Let's see which of us can reorganize all our tags first? I'm making that a goal for January.

Bryan | @BryanPerson

Very helpful post here, Jason, and a timely one, too. (I've also been kicking around an idea for a post on delicious for a week or two, so I'll make sure to write about this from a different angle).

Delicious bookmarks are most valuable for me when I'm doing research for or preparing a presentation. I'll create a unique tag for that presentation (like Blogging101), and then tag all relevant content that way for a while (assuming I have enough notice ahead of the presentation). As I'm getting my remarks/slides ready, I can review all Blogging101-tagged content and organize my thoughts.

Like you, Jason, my tags are generally a mess. I have, gulp, 447 of them, and most have 5 or fewer items. How about a challenge: Let's see which of us can reorganize all our tags first? I'm making that a goal for January.

Bryan | @BryanPerson

Very helpful post here, Jason, and a timely one, too. (I've also been kicking around an idea for a post on delicious for a week or two, so I'll make sure to write about this from a different angle).

Delicious bookmarks are most valuable for me when I'm doing research for or preparing a presentation. I'll create a unique tag for that presentation (like Blogging101), and then tag all relevant content that way for a while (assuming I have enough notice ahead of the presentation). As I'm getting my remarks/slides ready, I can review all Blogging101-tagged content and organize my thoughts.

Like you, Jason, my tags are generally a mess. I have, gulp, 447 of them, and most have 5 or fewer items. How about a challenge: Let's see which of us can reorganize all our tags first? I'm making that a goal for January.

Bryan | @BryanPerson

Very helpful post here, Jason, and a timely one, too. (I've also been kicking around an idea for a post on delicious for a week or two, so I'll make sure to write about this from a different angle).

Delicious bookmarks are most valuable for me when I'm doing research for or preparing a presentation. I'll create a unique tag for that presentation (like Blogging101), and then tag all relevant content that way for a while (assuming I have enough notice ahead of the presentation). As I'm getting my remarks/slides ready, I can review all Blogging101-tagged content and organize my thoughts.

Like you, Jason, my tags are generally a mess. I have, gulp, 447 of them, and most have 5 or fewer items. How about a challenge: Let's see which of us can reorganize all our tags first? I'm making that a goal for January.

Bryan | @BryanPerson

Very helpful post here, Jason, and a timely one, too. (I've also been kicking around an idea for a post on delicious for a week or two, so I'll make sure to write about this from a different angle).

Delicious bookmarks are most valuable for me when I'm doing research for or preparing a presentation. I'll create a unique tag for that presentation (like Blogging101), and then tag all relevant content that way for a while (assuming I have enough notice ahead of the presentation). As I'm getting my remarks/slides ready, I can review all Blogging101-tagged content and organize my thoughts.

Like you, Jason, my tags are generally a mess. I have, gulp, 447 of them, and most have 5 or fewer items. How about a challenge: Let's see which of us can reorganize all our tags first? I'm making that a goal for January.

Bryan | @BryanPerson

Very helpful post here, Jason, and a timely one, too. (I've also been kicking around an idea for a post on delicious for a week or two, so I'll make sure to write about this from a different angle).

Delicious bookmarks are most valuable for me when I'm doing research for or preparing a presentation. I'll create a unique tag for that presentation (like Blogging101), and then tag all relevant content that way for a while (assuming I have enough notice ahead of the presentation). As I'm getting my remarks/slides ready, I can review all Blogging101-tagged content and organize my thoughts.

Like you, Jason, my tags are generally a mess. I have, gulp, 447 of them, and most have 5 or fewer items. How about a challenge: Let's see which of us can reorganize all our tags first? I'm making that a goal for January.

Bryan | @BryanPerson

Very helpful post here, Jason, and a timely one, too. (I've also been kicking around an idea for a post on delicious for a week or two, so I'll make sure to write about this from a different angle).

Delicious bookmarks are most valuable for me when I'm doing research for or preparing a presentation. I'll create a unique tag for that presentation (like Blogging101), and then tag all relevant content that way for a while (assuming I have enough notice ahead of the presentation). As I'm getting my remarks/slides ready, I can review all Blogging101-tagged content and organize my thoughts.

Like you, Jason, my tags are generally a mess. I have, gulp, 447 of them, and most have 5 or fewer items. How about a challenge: Let's see which of us can reorganize all our tags first? I'm making that a goal for January.

Bryan | @BryanPerson

Very helpful post here, Jason, and a timely one, too. (I've also been kicking around an idea for a post on delicious for a week or two, so I'll make sure to write about this from a different angle).

Delicious bookmarks are most valuable for me when I'm doing research for or preparing a presentation. I'll create a unique tag for that presentation (like Blogging101), and then tag all relevant content that way for a while (assuming I have enough notice ahead of the presentation). As I'm getting my remarks/slides ready, I can review all Blogging101-tagged content and organize my thoughts.

Like you, Jason, my tags are generally a mess. I have, gulp, 447 of them, and most have 5 or fewer items. How about a challenge: Let's see which of us can reorganize all our tags first? I'm making that a goal for January.

Bryan | @BryanPerson

Very helpful post here, Jason, and a timely one, too. (I've also been kicking around an idea for a post on delicious for a week or two, so I'll make sure to write about this from a different angle).

Delicious bookmarks are most valuable for me when I'm doing research for or preparing a presentation. I'll create a unique tag for that presentation (like Blogging101), and then tag all relevant content that way for a while (assuming I have enough notice ahead of the presentation). As I'm getting my remarks/slides ready, I can review all Blogging101-tagged content and organize my thoughts.

Like you, Jason, my tags are generally a mess. I have, gulp, 447 of them, and most have 5 or fewer items. How about a challenge: Let's see which of us can reorganize all our tags first? I'm making that a goal for January.

Bryan | @BryanPerson

Very helpful post here, Jason, and a timely one, too. (I've also been kicking around an idea for a post on delicious for a week or two, so I'll make sure to write about this from a different angle).

Delicious bookmarks are most valuable for me when I'm doing research for or preparing a presentation. I'll create a unique tag for that presentation (like Blogging101), and then tag all relevant content that way for a while (assuming I have enough notice ahead of the presentation). As I'm getting my remarks/slides ready, I can review all Blogging101-tagged content and organize my thoughts.

Like you, Jason, my tags are generally a mess. I have, gulp, 447 of them, and most have 5 or fewer items. How about a challenge: Let's see which of us can reorganize all our tags first? I'm making that a goal for January.

Bryan | @BryanPerson

Very helpful post here, Jason, and a timely one, too. (I've also been kicking around an idea for a post on delicious for a week or two, so I'll make sure to write about this from a different angle).

Delicious bookmarks are most valuable for me when I'm doing research for or preparing a presentation. I'll create a unique tag for that presentation (like Blogging101), and then tag all relevant content that way for a while (assuming I have enough notice ahead of the presentation). As I'm getting my remarks/slides ready, I can review all Blogging101-tagged content and organize my thoughts.

Like you, Jason, my tags are generally a mess. I have, gulp, 447 of them, and most have 5 or fewer items. How about a challenge: Let's see which of us can reorganize all our tags first? I'm making that a goal for January.

Bryan | @BryanPerson

Very helpful post here, Jason, and a timely one, too. (I've also been kicking around an idea for a post on delicious for a week or two, so I'll make sure to write about this from a different angle).

Delicious bookmarks are most valuable for me when I'm doing research for or preparing a presentation. I'll create a unique tag for that presentation (like Blogging101), and then tag all relevant content that way for a while (assuming I have enough notice ahead of the presentation). As I'm getting my remarks/slides ready, I can review all Blogging101-tagged content and organize my thoughts.

Like you, Jason, my tags are generally a mess. I have, gulp, 447 of them, and most have 5 or fewer items. How about a challenge: Let's see which of us can reorganize all our tags first? I'm making that a goal for January.

Bryan | @BryanPerson

Very helpful post here, Jason, and a timely one, too. (I've also been kicking around an idea for a post on delicious for a week or two, so I'll make sure to write about this from a different angle).

Delicious bookmarks are most valuable for me when I'm doing research for or preparing a presentation. I'll create a unique tag for that presentation (like Blogging101), and then tag all relevant content that way for a while (assuming I have enough notice ahead of the presentation). As I'm getting my remarks/slides ready, I can review all Blogging101-tagged content and organize my thoughts.

Like you, Jason, my tags are generally a mess. I have, gulp, 447 of them, and most have 5 or fewer items. How about a challenge: Let's see which of us can reorganize all our tags first? I'm making that a goal for January.

Bryan | @BryanPerson

Very helpful post here, Jason, and a timely one, too. (I've also been kicking around an idea for a post on delicious for a week or two, so I'll make sure to write about this from a different angle).

Delicious bookmarks are most valuable for me when I'm doing research for or preparing a presentation. I'll create a unique tag for that presentation (like Blogging101), and then tag all relevant content that way for a while (assuming I have enough notice ahead of the presentation). As I'm getting my remarks/slides ready, I can review all Blogging101-tagged content and organize my thoughts.

Like you, Jason, my tags are generally a mess. I have, gulp, 447 of them, and most have 5 or fewer items. How about a challenge: Let's see which of us can reorganize all our tags first? I'm making that a goal for January.

Bryan | @BryanPerson

Very helpful post here, Jason, and a timely one, too. (I've also been kicking around an idea for a post on delicious for a week or two, so I'll make sure to write about this from a different angle).

Delicious bookmarks are most valuable for me when I'm doing research for or preparing a presentation. I'll create a unique tag for that presentation (like Blogging101), and then tag all relevant content that way for a while (assuming I have enough notice ahead of the presentation). As I'm getting my remarks/slides ready, I can review all Blogging101-tagged content and organize my thoughts.

Like you, Jason, my tags are generally a mess. I have, gulp, 447 of them, and most have 5 or fewer items. How about a challenge: Let's see which of us can reorganize all our tags first? I'm making that a goal for January.

Bryan | @BryanPerson

Wanted to add one other way I like to use delicious. I tag all (or many) of posts I leave comments on with the “commented” tag. This gives me a running history of posts/bloggers I've “interacted” with, and is also helpful when I want to check back in on follow-up posts from other readers later on.

Wanted to add one other way I like to use delicious. I tag all (or many) of posts I leave comments on with the “commented” tag. This gives me a running history of posts/bloggers I've “interacted” with, and is also helpful when I want to check back in on follow-up posts from other readers later on.

Wanted to add one other way I like to use delicious. I tag all (or many) of posts I leave comments on with the “commented” tag. This gives me a running history of posts/bloggers I've “interacted” with, and is also helpful when I want to check back in on follow-up posts from other readers later on.

Wanted to add one other way I like to use delicious. I tag all (or many) of posts I leave comments on with the “commented” tag. This gives me a running history of posts/bloggers I've “interacted” with, and is also helpful when I want to check back in on follow-up posts from other readers later on.

Wanted to add one other way I like to use delicious. I tag all (or many) of posts I leave comments on with the “commented” tag. This gives me a running history of posts/bloggers I've “interacted” with, and is also helpful when I want to check back in on follow-up posts from other readers later on.

Wanted to add one other way I like to use delicious. I tag all (or many) of posts I leave comments on with the “commented” tag. This gives me a running history of posts/bloggers I've “interacted” with, and is also helpful when I want to check back in on follow-up posts from other readers later on.

Wanted to add one other way I like to use delicious. I tag all (or many) of posts I leave comments on with the “commented” tag. This gives me a running history of posts/bloggers I've “interacted” with, and is also helpful when I want to check back in on follow-up posts from other readers later on.

Wanted to add one other way I like to use delicious. I tag all (or many) of posts I leave comments on with the “commented” tag. This gives me a running history of posts/bloggers I've “interacted” with, and is also helpful when I want to check back in on follow-up posts from other readers later on.

Wanted to add one other way I like to use delicious. I tag all (or many) of posts I leave comments on with the “commented” tag. This gives me a running history of posts/bloggers I've “interacted” with, and is also helpful when I want to check back in on follow-up posts from other readers later on.

Wanted to add one other way I like to use delicious. I tag all (or many) of posts I leave comments on with the “commented” tag. This gives me a running history of posts/bloggers I've “interacted” with, and is also helpful when I want to check back in on follow-up posts from other readers later on.

Wanted to add one other way I like to use delicious. I tag all (or many) of posts I leave comments on with the “commented” tag. This gives me a running history of posts/bloggers I've “interacted” with, and is also helpful when I want to check back in on follow-up posts from other readers later on.

Wanted to add one other way I like to use delicious. I tag all (or many) of posts I leave comments on with the “commented” tag. This gives me a running history of posts/bloggers I've “interacted” with, and is also helpful when I want to check back in on follow-up posts from other readers later on.

Wanted to add one other way I like to use delicious. I tag all (or many) of posts I leave comments on with the “commented” tag. This gives me a running history of posts/bloggers I've “interacted” with, and is also helpful when I want to check back in on follow-up posts from other readers later on.

Wanted to add one other way I like to use delicious. I tag all (or many) of posts I leave comments on with the “commented” tag. This gives me a running history of posts/bloggers I've “interacted” with, and is also helpful when I want to check back in on follow-up posts from other readers later on.

Wanted to add one other way I like to use delicious. I tag all (or many) of posts I leave comments on with the “commented” tag. This gives me a running history of posts/bloggers I've “interacted” with, and is also helpful when I want to check back in on follow-up posts from other readers later on.

Wanted to add one other way I like to use delicious. I tag all (or many) of posts I leave comments on with the “commented” tag. This gives me a running history of posts/bloggers I've “interacted” with, and is also helpful when I want to check back in on follow-up posts from other readers later on.

Wanted to add one other way I like to use delicious. I tag all (or many) of posts I leave comments on with the “commented” tag. This gives me a running history of posts/bloggers I've “interacted” with, and is also helpful when I want to check back in on follow-up posts from other readers later on.

Wanted to add one other way I like to use delicious. I tag all (or many) of posts I leave comments on with the “commented” tag. This gives me a running history of posts/bloggers I've “interacted” with, and is also helpful when I want to check back in on follow-up posts from other readers later on.

Wanted to add one other way I like to use delicious. I tag all (or many) of posts I leave comments on with the “commented” tag. This gives me a running history of posts/bloggers I've “interacted” with, and is also helpful when I want to check back in on follow-up posts from other readers later on.

Wanted to add one other way I like to use delicious. I tag all (or many) of posts I leave comments on with the “commented” tag. This gives me a running history of posts/bloggers I've “interacted” with, and is also helpful when I want to check back in on follow-up posts from other readers later on.

Wanted to add one other way I like to use delicious. I tag all (or many) of posts I leave comments on with the “commented” tag. This gives me a running history of posts/bloggers I've “interacted” with, and is also helpful when I want to check back in on follow-up posts from other readers later on.

Wanted to add one other way I like to use delicious. I tag all (or many) of posts I leave comments on with the “commented” tag. This gives me a running history of posts/bloggers I've “interacted” with, and is also helpful when I want to check back in on follow-up posts from other readers later on.

Wanted to add one other way I like to use delicious. I tag all (or many) of posts I leave comments on with the “commented” tag. This gives me a running history of posts/bloggers I've “interacted” with, and is also helpful when I want to check back in on follow-up posts from other readers later on.

Wanted to add one other way I like to use delicious. I tag all (or many) of posts I leave comments on with the “commented” tag. This gives me a running history of posts/bloggers I've “interacted” with, and is also helpful when I want to check back in on follow-up posts from other readers later on.

Wanted to add one other way I like to use delicious. I tag all (or many) of posts I leave comments on with the “commented” tag. This gives me a running history of posts/bloggers I've “interacted” with, and is also helpful when I want to check back in on follow-up posts from other readers later on.

Wanted to add one other way I like to use delicious. I tag all (or many) of posts I leave comments on with the “commented” tag. This gives me a running history of posts/bloggers I've “interacted” with, and is also helpful when I want to check back in on follow-up posts from other readers later on.

Wanted to add one other way I like to use delicious. I tag all (or many) of posts I leave comments on with the “commented” tag. This gives me a running history of posts/bloggers I've “interacted” with, and is also helpful when I want to check back in on follow-up posts from other readers later on.

Wanted to add one other way I like to use delicious. I tag all (or many) of posts I leave comments on with the “commented” tag. This gives me a running history of posts/bloggers I've “interacted” with, and is also helpful when I want to check back in on follow-up posts from other readers later on.

Wanted to add one other way I like to use delicious. I tag all (or many) of posts I leave comments on with the “commented” tag. This gives me a running history of posts/bloggers I've “interacted” with, and is also helpful when I want to check back in on follow-up posts from other readers later on.

Wanted to add one other way I like to use delicious. I tag all (or many) of posts I leave comments on with the “commented” tag. This gives me a running history of posts/bloggers I've “interacted” with, and is also helpful when I want to check back in on follow-up posts from other readers later on.

Wanted to add one other way I like to use delicious. I tag all (or many) of posts I leave comments on with the “commented” tag. This gives me a running history of posts/bloggers I've “interacted” with, and is also helpful when I want to check back in on follow-up posts from other readers later on.

Wanted to add one other way I like to use delicious. I tag all (or many) of posts I leave comments on with the “commented” tag. This gives me a running history of posts/bloggers I've “interacted” with, and is also helpful when I want to check back in on follow-up posts from other readers later on.

Wanted to add one other way I like to use delicious. I tag all (or many) of posts I leave comments on with the “commented” tag. This gives me a running history of posts/bloggers I've “interacted” with, and is also helpful when I want to check back in on follow-up posts from other readers later on.

Hi Jason,

I haven't been paying much attention to my Delicious tagging from all the work i have to do. Thanks for sharing how to navigate the wilds of Delicious.

All the Best!

Regards,

Erwin Chua

Hi Jason,

I haven't been paying much attention to my Delicious tagging from all the work i have to do. Thanks for sharing how to navigate the wilds of Delicious.

All the Best!

Regards,

Erwin Chua

Hi Jason,

I haven't been paying much attention to my Delicious tagging from all the work i have to do. Thanks for sharing how to navigate the wilds of Delicious.

All the Best!

Regards,

Erwin Chua

Hi Jason,

I haven't been paying much attention to my Delicious tagging from all the work i have to do. Thanks for sharing how to navigate the wilds of Delicious.

All the Best!

Regards,

Erwin Chua

Hi Jason,

I haven't been paying much attention to my Delicious tagging from all the work i have to do. Thanks for sharing how to navigate the wilds of Delicious.

All the Best!

Regards,

Erwin Chua

Hi Jason,

I haven't been paying much attention to my Delicious tagging from all the work i have to do. Thanks for sharing how to navigate the wilds of Delicious.

All the Best!

Regards,

Erwin Chua

Hi Jason,

I haven't been paying much attention to my Delicious tagging from all the work i have to do. Thanks for sharing how to navigate the wilds of Delicious.

All the Best!

Regards,

Erwin Chua

Hi Jason,

I haven't been paying much attention to my Delicious tagging from all the work i have to do. Thanks for sharing how to navigate the wilds of Delicious.

All the Best!

Regards,

Erwin Chua

Hi Jason,

I haven't been paying much attention to my Delicious tagging from all the work i have to do. Thanks for sharing how to navigate the wilds of Delicious.

All the Best!

Regards,

Erwin Chua

Hi Jason,

I haven't been paying much attention to my Delicious tagging from all the work i have to do. Thanks for sharing how to navigate the wilds of Delicious.

All the Best!

Regards,

Erwin Chua

Hi Jason,

I haven't been paying much attention to my Delicious tagging from all the work i have to do. Thanks for sharing how to navigate the wilds of Delicious.

All the Best!

Regards,

Erwin Chua

Hi Jason,

I haven't been paying much attention to my Delicious tagging from all the work i have to do. Thanks for sharing how to navigate the wilds of Delicious.

All the Best!

Regards,

Erwin Chua

Hi Jason,

I haven't been paying much attention to my Delicious tagging from all the work i have to do. Thanks for sharing how to navigate the wilds of Delicious.

All the Best!

Regards,

Erwin Chua

Hi Jason,

I haven't been paying much attention to my Delicious tagging from all the work i have to do. Thanks for sharing how to navigate the wilds of Delicious.

All the Best!

Regards,

Erwin Chua

Hi Jason,

I haven't been paying much attention to my Delicious tagging from all the work i have to do. Thanks for sharing how to navigate the wilds of Delicious.

All the Best!

Regards,

Erwin Chua

Hi Jason,

I haven't been paying much attention to my Delicious tagging from all the work i have to do. Thanks for sharing how to navigate the wilds of Delicious.

All the Best!

Regards,

Erwin Chua

Hi Jason,

I haven't been paying much attention to my Delicious tagging from all the work i have to do. Thanks for sharing how to navigate the wilds of Delicious.

All the Best!

Regards,

Erwin Chua

Hi Jason,

I haven't been paying much attention to my Delicious tagging from all the work i have to do. Thanks for sharing how to navigate the wilds of Delicious.

All the Best!

Regards,

Erwin Chua

Hi Jason,

I haven't been paying much attention to my Delicious tagging from all the work i have to do. Thanks for sharing how to navigate the wilds of Delicious.

All the Best!

Regards,

Erwin Chua

Hi Jason,

I haven't been paying much attention to my Delicious tagging from all the work i have to do. Thanks for sharing how to navigate the wilds of Delicious.

All the Best!

Regards,

Erwin Chua

Hi Jason,

I haven't been paying much attention to my Delicious tagging from all the work i have to do. Thanks for sharing how to navigate the wilds of Delicious.

All the Best!

Regards,

Erwin Chua

Hi Jason,

I haven't been paying much attention to my Delicious tagging from all the work i have to do. Thanks for sharing how to navigate the wilds of Delicious.

All the Best!

Regards,

Erwin Chua

Hi Jason,

I haven't been paying much attention to my Delicious tagging from all the work i have to do. Thanks for sharing how to navigate the wilds of Delicious.

All the Best!

Regards,

Erwin Chua

Hi Jason,

I haven't been paying much attention to my Delicious tagging from all the work i have to do. Thanks for sharing how to navigate the wilds of Delicious.

All the Best!

Regards,

Erwin Chua

Hi Jason,

I haven't been paying much attention to my Delicious tagging from all the work i have to do. Thanks for sharing how to navigate the wilds of Delicious.

All the Best!

Regards,

Erwin Chua

Hi Jason,

I haven't been paying much attention to my Delicious tagging from all the work i have to do. Thanks for sharing how to navigate the wilds of Delicious.

All the Best!

Regards,

Erwin Chua

Hi Jason,

I haven't been paying much attention to my Delicious tagging from all the work i have to do. Thanks for sharing how to navigate the wilds of Delicious.

All the Best!

Regards,

Erwin Chua

Hi Jason,

I haven't been paying much attention to my Delicious tagging from all the work i have to do. Thanks for sharing how to navigate the wilds of Delicious.

All the Best!

Regards,

Erwin Chua

Hi Jason,

I haven't been paying much attention to my Delicious tagging from all the work i have to do. Thanks for sharing how to navigate the wilds of Delicious.

All the Best!

Regards,

Erwin Chua

Hi Jason,

I haven't been paying much attention to my Delicious tagging from all the work i have to do. Thanks for sharing how to navigate the wilds of Delicious.

All the Best!

Regards,

Erwin Chua

Hi Jason,

I haven't been paying much attention to my Delicious tagging from all the work i have to do. Thanks for sharing how to navigate the wilds of Delicious.

All the Best!

Regards,

Erwin Chua

Hi Jason,

I haven't been paying much attention to my Delicious tagging from all the work i have to do. Thanks for sharing how to navigate the wilds of Delicious.

All the Best!

Regards,

Erwin Chua

Hi Jason,

I haven't been paying much attention to my Delicious tagging from all the work i have to do. Thanks for sharing how to navigate the wilds of Delicious.

All the Best!

Regards,

Erwin Chua

@BryanPerson, that is ingenious! I think I might borrow your idea. Most of the posts people respond to do so because they are thought provoking…why not save it for later and to remember why you commented on it.

@JasonFalls, a great reminder on cleaner tags.

@BryanPerson, that is ingenious! I think I might borrow your idea. Most of the posts people respond to do so because they are thought provoking…why not save it for later and to remember why you commented on it.

@JasonFalls, a great reminder on cleaner tags.

@BryanPerson, that is ingenious! I think I might borrow your idea. Most of the posts people respond to do so because they are thought provoking…why not save it for later and to remember why you commented on it.

@JasonFalls, a great reminder on cleaner tags.

@BryanPerson, that is ingenious! I think I might borrow your idea. Most of the posts people respond to do so because they are thought provoking…why not save it for later and to remember why you commented on it.

@JasonFalls, a great reminder on cleaner tags.

@BryanPerson, that is ingenious! I think I might borrow your idea. Most of the posts people respond to do so because they are thought provoking…why not save it for later and to remember why you commented on it.

@JasonFalls, a great reminder on cleaner tags.

@BryanPerson, that is ingenious! I think I might borrow your idea. Most of the posts people respond to do so because they are thought provoking…why not save it for later and to remember why you commented on it.

@JasonFalls, a great reminder on cleaner tags.

@BryanPerson, that is ingenious! I think I might borrow your idea. Most of the posts people respond to do so because they are thought provoking…why not save it for later and to remember why you commented on it.

@JasonFalls, a great reminder on cleaner tags.

@BryanPerson, that is ingenious! I think I might borrow your idea. Most of the posts people respond to do so because they are thought provoking…why not save it for later and to remember why you commented on it.

@JasonFalls, a great reminder on cleaner tags.

@BryanPerson, that is ingenious! I think I might borrow your idea. Most of the posts people respond to do so because they are thought provoking…why not save it for later and to remember why you commented on it.

@JasonFalls, a great reminder on cleaner tags.

@BryanPerson, that is ingenious! I think I might borrow your idea. Most of the posts people respond to do so because they are thought provoking…why not save it for later and to remember why you commented on it.

@JasonFalls, a great reminder on cleaner tags.

@BryanPerson, that is ingenious! I think I might borrow your idea. Most of the posts people respond to do so because they are thought provoking…why not save it for later and to remember why you commented on it.

@JasonFalls, a great reminder on cleaner tags.

@BryanPerson, that is ingenious! I think I might borrow your idea. Most of the posts people respond to do so because they are thought provoking…why not save it for later and to remember why you commented on it.

@JasonFalls, a great reminder on cleaner tags.

@BryanPerson, that is ingenious! I think I might borrow your idea. Most of the posts people respond to do so because they are thought provoking…why not save it for later and to remember why you commented on it.

@JasonFalls, a great reminder on cleaner tags.

@BryanPerson, that is ingenious! I think I might borrow your idea. Most of the posts people respond to do so because they are thought provoking…why not save it for later and to remember why you commented on it.

@JasonFalls, a great reminder on cleaner tags.

@BryanPerson, that is ingenious! I think I might borrow your idea. Most of the posts people respond to do so because they are thought provoking…why not save it for later and to remember why you commented on it.

@JasonFalls, a great reminder on cleaner tags.

@BryanPerson, that is ingenious! I think I might borrow your idea. Most of the posts people respond to do so because they are thought provoking…why not save it for later and to remember why you commented on it.

@JasonFalls, a great reminder on cleaner tags.

@BryanPerson, that is ingenious! I think I might borrow your idea. Most of the posts people respond to do so because they are thought provoking…why not save it for later and to remember why you commented on it.

@JasonFalls, a great reminder on cleaner tags.

@BryanPerson, that is ingenious! I think I might borrow your idea. Most of the posts people respond to do so because they are thought provoking…why not save it for later and to remember why you commented on it.

@JasonFalls, a great reminder on cleaner tags.

@BryanPerson, that is ingenious! I think I might borrow your idea. Most of the posts people respond to do so because they are thought provoking…why not save it for later and to remember why you commented on it.

@JasonFalls, a great reminder on cleaner tags.

@BryanPerson, that is ingenious! I think I might borrow your idea. Most of the posts people respond to do so because they are thought provoking…why not save it for later and to remember why you commented on it.

@JasonFalls, a great reminder on cleaner tags.

@BryanPerson, that is ingenious! I think I might borrow your idea. Most of the posts people respond to do so because they are thought provoking…why not save it for later and to remember why you commented on it.

@JasonFalls, a great reminder on cleaner tags.

@BryanPerson, that is ingenious! I think I might borrow your idea. Most of the posts people respond to do so because they are thought provoking…why not save it for later and to remember why you commented on it.

@JasonFalls, a great reminder on cleaner tags.

@BryanPerson, that is ingenious! I think I might borrow your idea. Most of the posts people respond to do so because they are thought provoking…why not save it for later and to remember why you commented on it.

@JasonFalls, a great reminder on cleaner tags.

@BryanPerson, that is ingenious! I think I might borrow your idea. Most of the posts people respond to do so because they are thought provoking…why not save it for later and to remember why you commented on it.

@JasonFalls, a great reminder on cleaner tags.

@BryanPerson, that is ingenious! I think I might borrow your idea. Most of the posts people respond to do so because they are thought provoking…why not save it for later and to remember why you commented on it.

@JasonFalls, a great reminder on cleaner tags.

@BryanPerson, that is ingenious! I think I might borrow your idea. Most of the posts people respond to do so because they are thought provoking…why not save it for later and to remember why you commented on it.

@JasonFalls, a great reminder on cleaner tags.

@BryanPerson, that is ingenious! I think I might borrow your idea. Most of the posts people respond to do so because they are thought provoking…why not save it for later and to remember why you commented on it.

@JasonFalls, a great reminder on cleaner tags.

@BryanPerson, that is ingenious! I think I might borrow your idea. Most of the posts people respond to do so because they are thought provoking…why not save it for later and to remember why you commented on it.

@JasonFalls, a great reminder on cleaner tags.

@BryanPerson, that is ingenious! I think I might borrow your idea. Most of the posts people respond to do so because they are thought provoking…why not save it for later and to remember why you commented on it.

@JasonFalls, a great reminder on cleaner tags.

@BryanPerson, that is ingenious! I think I might borrow your idea. Most of the posts people respond to do so because they are thought provoking…why not save it for later and to remember why you commented on it.

@JasonFalls, a great reminder on cleaner tags.

@BryanPerson, that is ingenious! I think I might borrow your idea. Most of the posts people respond to do so because they are thought provoking…why not save it for later and to remember why you commented on it.

@JasonFalls, a great reminder on cleaner tags.

@BryanPerson, that is ingenious! I think I might borrow your idea. Most of the posts people respond to do so because they are thought provoking…why not save it for later and to remember why you commented on it.

@JasonFalls, a great reminder on cleaner tags.

@BryanPerson, that is ingenious! I think I might borrow your idea. Most of the posts people respond to do so because they are thought provoking…why not save it for later and to remember why you commented on it.

@JasonFalls, a great reminder on cleaner tags.

I love delicious! But I struggle with 1.) the desire to bookmark everything, and 2.) indecisiveness as to what to tag things. So your reminder to keep it simple and keep it consistent couldn't be more timely!

I love delicious! But I struggle with 1.) the desire to bookmark everything, and 2.) indecisiveness as to what to tag things. So your reminder to keep it simple and keep it consistent couldn't be more timely!

I love delicious! But I struggle with 1.) the desire to bookmark everything, and 2.) indecisiveness as to what to tag things. So your reminder to keep it simple and keep it consistent couldn't be more timely!

I love delicious! But I struggle with 1.) the desire to bookmark everything, and 2.) indecisiveness as to what to tag things. So your reminder to keep it simple and keep it consistent couldn't be more timely!

I love delicious! But I struggle with 1.) the desire to bookmark everything, and 2.) indecisiveness as to what to tag things. So your reminder to keep it simple and keep it consistent couldn't be more timely!

I love delicious! But I struggle with 1.) the desire to bookmark everything, and 2.) indecisiveness as to what to tag things. So your reminder to keep it simple and keep it consistent couldn't be more timely!

I love delicious! But I struggle with 1.) the desire to bookmark everything, and 2.) indecisiveness as to what to tag things. So your reminder to keep it simple and keep it consistent couldn't be more timely!

I love delicious! But I struggle with 1.) the desire to bookmark everything, and 2.) indecisiveness as to what to tag things. So your reminder to keep it simple and keep it consistent couldn't be more timely!

I love delicious! But I struggle with 1.) the desire to bookmark everything, and 2.) indecisiveness as to what to tag things. So your reminder to keep it simple and keep it consistent couldn't be more timely!

I love delicious! But I struggle with 1.) the desire to bookmark everything, and 2.) indecisiveness as to what to tag things. So your reminder to keep it simple and keep it consistent couldn't be more timely!

I love delicious! But I struggle with 1.) the desire to bookmark everything, and 2.) indecisiveness as to what to tag things. So your reminder to keep it simple and keep it consistent couldn't be more timely!

I love delicious! But I struggle with 1.) the desire to bookmark everything, and 2.) indecisiveness as to what to tag things. So your reminder to keep it simple and keep it consistent couldn't be more timely!

I love delicious! But I struggle with 1.) the desire to bookmark everything, and 2.) indecisiveness as to what to tag things. So your reminder to keep it simple and keep it consistent couldn't be more timely!

I love delicious! But I struggle with 1.) the desire to bookmark everything, and 2.) indecisiveness as to what to tag things. So your reminder to keep it simple and keep it consistent couldn't be more timely!

I love delicious! But I struggle with 1.) the desire to bookmark everything, and 2.) indecisiveness as to what to tag things. So your reminder to keep it simple and keep it consistent couldn't be more timely!

I love delicious! But I struggle with 1.) the desire to bookmark everything, and 2.) indecisiveness as to what to tag things. So your reminder to keep it simple and keep it consistent couldn't be more timely!

I love delicious! But I struggle with 1.) the desire to bookmark everything, and 2.) indecisiveness as to what to tag things. So your reminder to keep it simple and keep it consistent couldn't be more timely!

I love delicious! But I struggle with 1.) the desire to bookmark everything, and 2.) indecisiveness as to what to tag things. So your reminder to keep it simple and keep it consistent couldn't be more timely!

I love delicious! But I struggle with 1.) the desire to bookmark everything, and 2.) indecisiveness as to what to tag things. So your reminder to keep it simple and keep it consistent couldn't be more timely!

I love delicious! But I struggle with 1.) the desire to bookmark everything, and 2.) indecisiveness as to what to tag things. So your reminder to keep it simple and keep it consistent couldn't be more timely!

I love delicious! But I struggle with 1.) the desire to bookmark everything, and 2.) indecisiveness as to what to tag things. So your reminder to keep it simple and keep it consistent couldn't be more timely!

I love delicious! But I struggle with 1.) the desire to bookmark everything, and 2.) indecisiveness as to what to tag things. So your reminder to keep it simple and keep it consistent couldn't be more timely!

I love delicious! But I struggle with 1.) the desire to bookmark everything, and 2.) indecisiveness as to what to tag things. So your reminder to keep it simple and keep it consistent couldn't be more timely!

I love delicious! But I struggle with 1.) the desire to bookmark everything, and 2.) indecisiveness as to what to tag things. So your reminder to keep it simple and keep it consistent couldn't be more timely!

I love delicious! But I struggle with 1.) the desire to bookmark everything, and 2.) indecisiveness as to what to tag things. So your reminder to keep it simple and keep it consistent couldn't be more timely!

I love delicious! But I struggle with 1.) the desire to bookmark everything, and 2.) indecisiveness as to what to tag things. So your reminder to keep it simple and keep it consistent couldn't be more timely!

I love delicious! But I struggle with 1.) the desire to bookmark everything, and 2.) indecisiveness as to what to tag things. So your reminder to keep it simple and keep it consistent couldn't be more timely!

I love delicious! But I struggle with 1.) the desire to bookmark everything, and 2.) indecisiveness as to what to tag things. So your reminder to keep it simple and keep it consistent couldn't be more timely!

I love delicious! But I struggle with 1.) the desire to bookmark everything, and 2.) indecisiveness as to what to tag things. So your reminder to keep it simple and keep it consistent couldn't be more timely!

I love delicious! But I struggle with 1.) the desire to bookmark everything, and 2.) indecisiveness as to what to tag things. So your reminder to keep it simple and keep it consistent couldn't be more timely!

I love delicious! But I struggle with 1.) the desire to bookmark everything, and 2.) indecisiveness as to what to tag things. So your reminder to keep it simple and keep it consistent couldn't be more timely!

I love delicious! But I struggle with 1.) the desire to bookmark everything, and 2.) indecisiveness as to what to tag things. So your reminder to keep it simple and keep it consistent couldn't be more timely!

I love delicious! But I struggle with 1.) the desire to bookmark everything, and 2.) indecisiveness as to what to tag things. So your reminder to keep it simple and keep it consistent couldn't be more timely!

Jason, Thanks for the lessons learned, pretty helpful. I had switched to foxfire with a new Mac and couldn't figure out how to get the button back on the toolbar, but the link you fixed that.

Thanks, -Eric

Jason, Thanks for the lessons learned, pretty helpful. I had switched to foxfire with a new Mac and couldn't figure out how to get the button back on the toolbar, but the link you fixed that.

Thanks, -Eric

Jason, Thanks for the lessons learned, pretty helpful. I had switched to foxfire with a new Mac and couldn't figure out how to get the button back on the toolbar, but the link you fixed that.

Thanks, -Eric

Jason, Thanks for the lessons learned, pretty helpful. I had switched to foxfire with a new Mac and couldn't figure out how to get the button back on the toolbar, but the link you fixed that.

Thanks, -Eric

Jason, Thanks for the lessons learned, pretty helpful. I had switched to foxfire with a new Mac and couldn't figure out how to get the button back on the toolbar, but the link you fixed that.

Thanks, -Eric

Jason, Thanks for the lessons learned, pretty helpful. I had switched to foxfire with a new Mac and couldn't figure out how to get the button back on the toolbar, but the link you fixed that.

Thanks, -Eric

Jason, Thanks for the lessons learned, pretty helpful. I had switched to foxfire with a new Mac and couldn't figure out how to get the button back on the toolbar, but the link you fixed that.

Thanks, -Eric

Jason, Thanks for the lessons learned, pretty helpful. I had switched to foxfire with a new Mac and couldn't figure out how to get the button back on the toolbar, but the link you fixed that.

Thanks, -Eric

Jason, Thanks for the lessons learned, pretty helpful. I had switched to foxfire with a new Mac and couldn't figure out how to get the button back on the toolbar, but the link you fixed that.

Thanks, -Eric

Jason, Thanks for the lessons learned, pretty helpful. I had switched to foxfire with a new Mac and couldn't figure out how to get the button back on the toolbar, but the link you fixed that.

Thanks, -Eric

Jason, Thanks for the lessons learned, pretty helpful. I had switched to foxfire with a new Mac and couldn't figure out how to get the button back on the toolbar, but the link you fixed that.

Thanks, -Eric

Jason, Thanks for the lessons learned, pretty helpful. I had switched to foxfire with a new Mac and couldn't figure out how to get the button back on the toolbar, but the link you fixed that.

Thanks, -Eric

Jason, Thanks for the lessons learned, pretty helpful. I had switched to foxfire with a new Mac and couldn't figure out how to get the button back on the toolbar, but the link you fixed that.

Thanks, -Eric

Jason, Thanks for the lessons learned, pretty helpful. I had switched to foxfire with a new Mac and couldn't figure out how to get the button back on the toolbar, but the link you fixed that.

Thanks, -Eric

Jason, Thanks for the lessons learned, pretty helpful. I had switched to foxfire with a new Mac and couldn't figure out how to get the button back on the toolbar, but the link you fixed that.

Thanks, -Eric

Jason, Thanks for the lessons learned, pretty helpful. I had switched to foxfire with a new Mac and couldn't figure out how to get the button back on the toolbar, but the link you fixed that.

Thanks, -Eric

Jason, Thanks for the lessons learned, pretty helpful. I had switched to foxfire with a new Mac and couldn't figure out how to get the button back on the toolbar, but the link you fixed that.

Thanks, -Eric

Jason, Thanks for the lessons learned, pretty helpful. I had switched to foxfire with a new Mac and couldn't figure out how to get the button back on the toolbar, but the link you fixed that.

Thanks, -Eric

Jason, Thanks for the lessons learned, pretty helpful. I had switched to foxfire with a new Mac and couldn't figure out how to get the button back on the toolbar, but the link you fixed that.

Thanks, -Eric

Jason, Thanks for the lessons learned, pretty helpful. I had switched to foxfire with a new Mac and couldn't figure out how to get the button back on the toolbar, but the link you fixed that.

Thanks, -Eric

Jason, Thanks for the lessons learned, pretty helpful. I had switched to foxfire with a new Mac and couldn't figure out how to get the button back on the toolbar, but the link you fixed that.

Thanks, -Eric

Jason, Thanks for the lessons learned, pretty helpful. I had switched to foxfire with a new Mac and couldn't figure out how to get the button back on the toolbar, but the link you fixed that.

Thanks, -Eric

Jason, Thanks for the lessons learned, pretty helpful. I had switched to foxfire with a new Mac and couldn't figure out how to get the button back on the toolbar, but the link you fixed that.

Thanks, -Eric

Jason, Thanks for the lessons learned, pretty helpful. I had switched to foxfire with a new Mac and couldn't figure out how to get the button back on the toolbar, but the link you fixed that.

Thanks, -Eric

Jason, Thanks for the lessons learned, pretty helpful. I had switched to foxfire with a new Mac and couldn't figure out how to get the button back on the toolbar, but the link you fixed that.

Thanks, -Eric

Jason, Thanks for the lessons learned, pretty helpful. I had switched to foxfire with a new Mac and couldn't figure out how to get the button back on the toolbar, but the link you fixed that.

Thanks, -Eric

Jason, Thanks for the lessons learned, pretty helpful. I had switched to foxfire with a new Mac and couldn't figure out how to get the button back on the toolbar, but the link you fixed that.

Thanks, -Eric

Jason, Thanks for the lessons learned, pretty helpful. I had switched to foxfire with a new Mac and couldn't figure out how to get the button back on the toolbar, but the link you fixed that.

Thanks, -Eric

Jason, Thanks for the lessons learned, pretty helpful. I had switched to foxfire with a new Mac and couldn't figure out how to get the button back on the toolbar, but the link you fixed that.

Thanks, -Eric

Jason, Thanks for the lessons learned, pretty helpful. I had switched to foxfire with a new Mac and couldn't figure out how to get the button back on the toolbar, but the link you fixed that.

Thanks, -Eric

Jason, Thanks for the lessons learned, pretty helpful. I had switched to foxfire with a new Mac and couldn't figure out how to get the button back on the toolbar, but the link you fixed that.

Thanks, -Eric

Jason, Thanks for the lessons learned, pretty helpful. I had switched to foxfire with a new Mac and couldn't figure out how to get the button back on the toolbar, but the link you fixed that.

Thanks, -Eric

Jason, Thanks for the lessons learned, pretty helpful. I had switched to foxfire with a new Mac and couldn't figure out how to get the button back on the toolbar, but the link you fixed that.

Thanks, -Eric

I've never used delicious before because I never got into bookmarking. I use my RSS and get all my reads from that, and have very few things bookmarked. Everyone keeps telling me to get involved with this, especially for marketing purposes. Do you find yourself using bookmarking tools more for marketing or more for personal use. Either way, I should learn more about them, this is a great start.

I've never used delicious before because I never got into bookmarking. I use my RSS and get all my reads from that, and have very few things bookmarked. Everyone keeps telling me to get involved with this, especially for marketing purposes. Do you find yourself using bookmarking tools more for marketing or more for personal use. Either way, I should learn more about them, this is a great start.

I've never used delicious before because I never got into bookmarking. I use my RSS and get all my reads from that, and have very few things bookmarked. Everyone keeps telling me to get involved with this, especially for marketing purposes. Do you find yourself using bookmarking tools more for marketing or more for personal use. Either way, I should learn more about them, this is a great start.

I've never used delicious before because I never got into bookmarking. I use my RSS and get all my reads from that, and have very few things bookmarked. Everyone keeps telling me to get involved with this, especially for marketing purposes. Do you find yourself using bookmarking tools more for marketing or more for personal use. Either way, I should learn more about them, this is a great start.

I've never used delicious before because I never got into bookmarking. I use my RSS and get all my reads from that, and have very few things bookmarked. Everyone keeps telling me to get involved with this, especially for marketing purposes. Do you find yourself using bookmarking tools more for marketing or more for personal use. Either way, I should learn more about them, this is a great start.

I've never used delicious before because I never got into bookmarking. I use my RSS and get all my reads from that, and have very few things bookmarked. Everyone keeps telling me to get involved with this, especially for marketing purposes. Do you find yourself using bookmarking tools more for marketing or more for personal use. Either way, I should learn more about them, this is a great start.

I've never used delicious before because I never got into bookmarking. I use my RSS and get all my reads from that, and have very few things bookmarked. Everyone keeps telling me to get involved with this, especially for marketing purposes. Do you find yourself using bookmarking tools more for marketing or more for personal use. Either way, I should learn more about them, this is a great start.

I've never used delicious before because I never got into bookmarking. I use my RSS and get all my reads from that, and have very few things bookmarked. Everyone keeps telling me to get involved with this, especially for marketing purposes. Do you find yourself using bookmarking tools more for marketing or more for personal use. Either way, I should learn more about them, this is a great start.

I've never used delicious before because I never got into bookmarking. I use my RSS and get all my reads from that, and have very few things bookmarked. Everyone keeps telling me to get involved with this, especially for marketing purposes. Do you find yourself using bookmarking tools more for marketing or more for personal use. Either way, I should learn more about them, this is a great start.

I've never used delicious before because I never got into bookmarking. I use my RSS and get all my reads from that, and have very few things bookmarked. Everyone keeps telling me to get involved with this, especially for marketing purposes. Do you find yourself using bookmarking tools more for marketing or more for personal use. Either way, I should learn more about them, this is a great start.

I've never used delicious before because I never got into bookmarking. I use my RSS and get all my reads from that, and have very few things bookmarked. Everyone keeps telling me to get involved with this, especially for marketing purposes. Do you find yourself using bookmarking tools more for marketing or more for personal use. Either way, I should learn more about them, this is a great start.

I've never used delicious before because I never got into bookmarking. I use my RSS and get all my reads from that, and have very few things bookmarked. Everyone keeps telling me to get involved with this, especially for marketing purposes. Do you find yourself using bookmarking tools more for marketing or more for personal use. Either way, I should learn more about them, this is a great start.

I've never used delicious before because I never got into bookmarking. I use my RSS and get all my reads from that, and have very few things bookmarked. Everyone keeps telling me to get involved with this, especially for marketing purposes. Do you find yourself using bookmarking tools more for marketing or more for personal use. Either way, I should learn more about them, this is a great start.

I've never used delicious before because I never got into bookmarking. I use my RSS and get all my reads from that, and have very few things bookmarked. Everyone keeps telling me to get involved with this, especially for marketing purposes. Do you find yourself using bookmarking tools more for marketing or more for personal use. Either way, I should learn more about them, this is a great start.

I've never used delicious before because I never got into bookmarking. I use my RSS and get all my reads from that, and have very few things bookmarked. Everyone keeps telling me to get involved with this, especially for marketing purposes. Do you find yourself using bookmarking tools more for marketing or more for personal use. Either way, I should learn more about them, this is a great start.

I've never used delicious before because I never got into bookmarking. I use my RSS and get all my reads from that, and have very few things bookmarked. Everyone keeps telling me to get involved with this, especially for marketing purposes. Do you find yourself using bookmarking tools more for marketing or more for personal use. Either way, I should learn more about them, this is a great start.

I've never used delicious before because I never got into bookmarking. I use my RSS and get all my reads from that, and have very few things bookmarked. Everyone keeps telling me to get involved with this, especially for marketing purposes. Do you find yourself using bookmarking tools more for marketing or more for personal use. Either way, I should learn more about them, this is a great start.

I've never used delicious before because I never got into bookmarking. I use my RSS and get all my reads from that, and have very few things bookmarked. Everyone keeps telling me to get involved with this, especially for marketing purposes. Do you find yourself using bookmarking tools more for marketing or more for personal use. Either way, I should learn more about them, this is a great start.

I've never used delicious before because I never got into bookmarking. I use my RSS and get all my reads from that, and have very few things bookmarked. Everyone keeps telling me to get involved with this, especially for marketing purposes. Do you find yourself using bookmarking tools more for marketing or more for personal use. Either way, I should learn more about them, this is a great start.

I've never used delicious before because I never got into bookmarking. I use my RSS and get all my reads from that, and have very few things bookmarked. Everyone keeps telling me to get involved with this, especially for marketing purposes. Do you find yourself using bookmarking tools more for marketing or more for personal use. Either way, I should learn more about them, this is a great start.

I've never used delicious before because I never got into bookmarking. I use my RSS and get all my reads from that, and have very few things bookmarked. Everyone keeps telling me to get involved with this, especially for marketing purposes. Do you find yourself using bookmarking tools more for marketing or more for personal use. Either way, I should learn more about them, this is a great start.

I've never used delicious before because I never got into bookmarking. I use my RSS and get all my reads from that, and have very few things bookmarked. Everyone keeps telling me to get involved with this, especially for marketing purposes. Do you find yourself using bookmarking tools more for marketing or more for personal use. Either way, I should learn more about them, this is a great start.

I've never used delicious before because I never got into bookmarking. I use my RSS and get all my reads from that, and have very few things bookmarked. Everyone keeps telling me to get involved with this, especially for marketing purposes. Do you find yourself using bookmarking tools more for marketing or more for personal use. Either way, I should learn more about them, this is a great start.

I've never used delicious before because I never got into bookmarking. I use my RSS and get all my reads from that, and have very few things bookmarked. Everyone keeps telling me to get involved with this, especially for marketing purposes. Do you find yourself using bookmarking tools more for marketing or more for personal use. Either way, I should learn more about them, this is a great start.

I've never used delicious before because I never got into bookmarking. I use my RSS and get all my reads from that, and have very few things bookmarked. Everyone keeps telling me to get involved with this, especially for marketing purposes. Do you find yourself using bookmarking tools more for marketing or more for personal use. Either way, I should learn more about them, this is a great start.

I've never used delicious before because I never got into bookmarking. I use my RSS and get all my reads from that, and have very few things bookmarked. Everyone keeps telling me to get involved with this, especially for marketing purposes. Do you find yourself using bookmarking tools more for marketing or more for personal use. Either way, I should learn more about them, this is a great start.

I've never used delicious before because I never got into bookmarking. I use my RSS and get all my reads from that, and have very few things bookmarked. Everyone keeps telling me to get involved with this, especially for marketing purposes. Do you find yourself using bookmarking tools more for marketing or more for personal use. Either way, I should learn more about them, this is a great start.

I've never used delicious before because I never got into bookmarking. I use my RSS and get all my reads from that, and have very few things bookmarked. Everyone keeps telling me to get involved with this, especially for marketing purposes. Do you find yourself using bookmarking tools more for marketing or more for personal use. Either way, I should learn more about them, this is a great start.

I've never used delicious before because I never got into bookmarking. I use my RSS and get all my reads from that, and have very few things bookmarked. Everyone keeps telling me to get involved with this, especially for marketing purposes. Do you find yourself using bookmarking tools more for marketing or more for personal use. Either way, I should learn more about them, this is a great start.

I've never used delicious before because I never got into bookmarking. I use my RSS and get all my reads from that, and have very few things bookmarked. Everyone keeps telling me to get involved with this, especially for marketing purposes. Do you find yourself using bookmarking tools more for marketing or more for personal use. Either way, I should learn more about them, this is a great start.

I've never used delicious before because I never got into bookmarking. I use my RSS and get all my reads from that, and have very few things bookmarked. Everyone keeps telling me to get involved with this, especially for marketing purposes. Do you find yourself using bookmarking tools more for marketing or more for personal use. Either way, I should learn more about them, this is a great start.

I've never used delicious before because I never got into bookmarking. I use my RSS and get all my reads from that, and have very few things bookmarked. Everyone keeps telling me to get involved with this, especially for marketing purposes. Do you find yourself using bookmarking tools more for marketing or more for personal use. Either way, I should learn more about them, this is a great start.

I've never used delicious before because I never got into bookmarking. I use my RSS and get all my reads from that, and have very few things bookmarked. Everyone keeps telling me to get involved with this, especially for marketing purposes. Do you find yourself using bookmarking tools more for marketing or more for personal use. Either way, I should learn more about them, this is a great start.

I have the same problem with Delicious, but I still find it invaluable in locating info I've squirreled away. The “keep it simple” advice would have been useful to me when I started tagging my financial stuff in Wesabe a year ago, too.

I have the same problem with Delicious, but I still find it invaluable in locating info I've squirreled away. The “keep it simple” advice would have been useful to me when I started tagging my financial stuff in Wesabe a year ago, too.

I have the same problem with Delicious, but I still find it invaluable in locating info I've squirreled away. The “keep it simple” advice would have been useful to me when I started tagging my financial stuff in Wesabe a year ago, too.

I have the same problem with Delicious, but I still find it invaluable in locating info I've squirreled away. The “keep it simple” advice would have been useful to me when I started tagging my financial stuff in Wesabe a year ago, too.

I have the same problem with Delicious, but I still find it invaluable in locating info I've squirreled away. The “keep it simple” advice would have been useful to me when I started tagging my financial stuff in Wesabe a year ago, too.

I have the same problem with Delicious, but I still find it invaluable in locating info I've squirreled away. The “keep it simple” advice would have been useful to me when I started tagging my financial stuff in Wesabe a year ago, too.

I have the same problem with Delicious, but I still find it invaluable in locating info I've squirreled away. The “keep it simple” advice would have been useful to me when I started tagging my financial stuff in Wesabe a year ago, too.

I have the same problem with Delicious, but I still find it invaluable in locating info I've squirreled away. The “keep it simple” advice would have been useful to me when I started tagging my financial stuff in Wesabe a year ago, too.

I have the same problem with Delicious, but I still find it invaluable in locating info I've squirreled away. The “keep it simple” advice would have been useful to me when I started tagging my financial stuff in Wesabe a year ago, too.

I have the same problem with Delicious, but I still find it invaluable in locating info I've squirreled away. The “keep it simple” advice would have been useful to me when I started tagging my financial stuff in Wesabe a year ago, too.

I have the same problem with Delicious, but I still find it invaluable in locating info I've squirreled away. The “keep it simple” advice would have been useful to me when I started tagging my financial stuff in Wesabe a year ago, too.

I have the same problem with Delicious, but I still find it invaluable in locating info I've squirreled away. The “keep it simple” advice would have been useful to me when I started tagging my financial stuff in Wesabe a year ago, too.

I have the same problem with Delicious, but I still find it invaluable in locating info I've squirreled away. The “keep it simple” advice would have been useful to me when I started tagging my financial stuff in Wesabe a year ago, too.

I have the same problem with Delicious, but I still find it invaluable in locating info I've squirreled away. The “keep it simple” advice would have been useful to me when I started tagging my financial stuff in Wesabe a year ago, too.

I have the same problem with Delicious, but I still find it invaluable in locating info I've squirreled away. The “keep it simple” advice would have been useful to me when I started tagging my financial stuff in Wesabe a year ago, too.

I have the same problem with Delicious, but I still find it invaluable in locating info I've squirreled away. The “keep it simple” advice would have been useful to me when I started tagging my financial stuff in Wesabe a year ago, too.

I have the same problem with Delicious, but I still find it invaluable in locating info I've squirreled away. The “keep it simple” advice would have been useful to me when I started tagging my financial stuff in Wesabe a year ago, too.

I have the same problem with Delicious, but I still find it invaluable in locating info I've squirreled away. The “keep it simple” advice would have been useful to me when I started tagging my financial stuff in Wesabe a year ago, too.

I have the same problem with Delicious, but I still find it invaluable in locating info I've squirreled away. The “keep it simple” advice would have been useful to me when I started tagging my financial stuff in Wesabe a year ago, too.

I have the same problem with Delicious, but I still find it invaluable in locating info I've squirreled away. The “keep it simple” advice would have been useful to me when I started tagging my financial stuff in Wesabe a year ago, too.

I have the same problem with Delicious, but I still find it invaluable in locating info I've squirreled away. The “keep it simple” advice would have been useful to me when I started tagging my financial stuff in Wesabe a year ago, too.

I have the same problem with Delicious, but I still find it invaluable in locating info I've squirreled away. The “keep it simple” advice would have been useful to me when I started tagging my financial stuff in Wesabe a year ago, too.

I have the same problem with Delicious, but I still find it invaluable in locating info I've squirreled away. The “keep it simple” advice would have been useful to me when I started tagging my financial stuff in Wesabe a year ago, too.

I have the same problem with Delicious, but I still find it invaluable in locating info I've squirreled away. The “keep it simple” advice would have been useful to me when I started tagging my financial stuff in Wesabe a year ago, too.

I have the same problem with Delicious, but I still find it invaluable in locating info I've squirreled away. The “keep it simple” advice would have been useful to me when I started tagging my financial stuff in Wesabe a year ago, too.

I have the same problem with Delicious, but I still find it invaluable in locating info I've squirreled away. The “keep it simple” advice would have been useful to me when I started tagging my financial stuff in Wesabe a year ago, too.

I have the same problem with Delicious, but I still find it invaluable in locating info I've squirreled away. The “keep it simple” advice would have been useful to me when I started tagging my financial stuff in Wesabe a year ago, too.

I have the same problem with Delicious, but I still find it invaluable in locating info I've squirreled away. The “keep it simple” advice would have been useful to me when I started tagging my financial stuff in Wesabe a year ago, too.

I have the same problem with Delicious, but I still find it invaluable in locating info I've squirreled away. The “keep it simple” advice would have been useful to me when I started tagging my financial stuff in Wesabe a year ago, too.

I have the same problem with Delicious, but I still find it invaluable in locating info I've squirreled away. The “keep it simple” advice would have been useful to me when I started tagging my financial stuff in Wesabe a year ago, too.

I have the same problem with Delicious, but I still find it invaluable in locating info I've squirreled away. The “keep it simple” advice would have been useful to me when I started tagging my financial stuff in Wesabe a year ago, too.

I have the same problem with Delicious, but I still find it invaluable in locating info I've squirreled away. The “keep it simple” advice would have been useful to me when I started tagging my financial stuff in Wesabe a year ago, too.

I have the same problem with Delicious, but I still find it invaluable in locating info I've squirreled away. The “keep it simple” advice would have been useful to me when I started tagging my financial stuff in Wesabe a year ago, too.

BudgetPulse passed this on to me via twitter! great article, I am just starting out with my blog and this whole web 2.0 social networking phenomena and this is a great starting point! Thanks.

BudgetPulse passed this on to me via twitter! great article, I am just starting out with my blog and this whole web 2.0 social networking phenomena and this is a great starting point! Thanks.

BudgetPulse passed this on to me via twitter! great article, I am just starting out with my blog and this whole web 2.0 social networking phenomena and this is a great starting point! Thanks.

BudgetPulse passed this on to me via twitter! great article, I am just starting out with my blog and this whole web 2.0 social networking phenomena and this is a great starting point! Thanks.

BudgetPulse passed this on to me via twitter! great article, I am just starting out with my blog and this whole web 2.0 social networking phenomena and this is a great starting point! Thanks.

BudgetPulse passed this on to me via twitter! great article, I am just starting out with my blog and this whole web 2.0 social networking phenomena and this is a great starting point! Thanks.

BudgetPulse passed this on to me via twitter! great article, I am just starting out with my blog and this whole web 2.0 social networking phenomena and this is a great starting point! Thanks.

BudgetPulse passed this on to me via twitter! great article, I am just starting out with my blog and this whole web 2.0 social networking phenomena and this is a great starting point! Thanks.

BudgetPulse passed this on to me via twitter! great article, I am just starting out with my blog and this whole web 2.0 social networking phenomena and this is a great starting point! Thanks.

BudgetPulse passed this on to me via twitter! great article, I am just starting out with my blog and this whole web 2.0 social networking phenomena and this is a great starting point! Thanks.

BudgetPulse passed this on to me via twitter! great article, I am just starting out with my blog and this whole web 2.0 social networking phenomena and this is a great starting point! Thanks.

BudgetPulse passed this on to me via twitter! great article, I am just starting out with my blog and this whole web 2.0 social networking phenomena and this is a great starting point! Thanks.

BudgetPulse passed this on to me via twitter! great article, I am just starting out with my blog and this whole web 2.0 social networking phenomena and this is a great starting point! Thanks.

BudgetPulse passed this on to me via twitter! great article, I am just starting out with my blog and this whole web 2.0 social networking phenomena and this is a great starting point! Thanks.

BudgetPulse passed this on to me via twitter! great article, I am just starting out with my blog and this whole web 2.0 social networking phenomena and this is a great starting point! Thanks.

BudgetPulse passed this on to me via twitter! great article, I am just starting out with my blog and this whole web 2.0 social networking phenomena and this is a great starting point! Thanks.

BudgetPulse passed this on to me via twitter! great article, I am just starting out with my blog and this whole web 2.0 social networking phenomena and this is a great starting point! Thanks.

BudgetPulse passed this on to me via twitter! great article, I am just starting out with my blog and this whole web 2.0 social networking phenomena and this is a great starting point! Thanks.

BudgetPulse passed this on to me via twitter! great article, I am just starting out with my blog and this whole web 2.0 social networking phenomena and this is a great starting point! Thanks.

BudgetPulse passed this on to me via twitter! great article, I am just starting out with my blog and this whole web 2.0 social networking phenomena and this is a great starting point! Thanks.

BudgetPulse passed this on to me via twitter! great article, I am just starting out with my blog and this whole web 2.0 social networking phenomena and this is a great starting point! Thanks.

BudgetPulse passed this on to me via twitter! great article, I am just starting out with my blog and this whole web 2.0 social networking phenomena and this is a great starting point! Thanks.

BudgetPulse passed this on to me via twitter! great article, I am just starting out with my blog and this whole web 2.0 social networking phenomena and this is a great starting point! Thanks.

BudgetPulse passed this on to me via twitter! great article, I am just starting out with my blog and this whole web 2.0 social networking phenomena and this is a great starting point! Thanks.

BudgetPulse passed this on to me via twitter! great article, I am just starting out with my blog and this whole web 2.0 social networking phenomena and this is a great starting point! Thanks.

BudgetPulse passed this on to me via twitter! great article, I am just starting out with my blog and this whole web 2.0 social networking phenomena and this is a great starting point! Thanks.

BudgetPulse passed this on to me via twitter! great article, I am just starting out with my blog and this whole web 2.0 social networking phenomena and this is a great starting point! Thanks.

BudgetPulse passed this on to me via twitter! great article, I am just starting out with my blog and this whole web 2.0 social networking phenomena and this is a great starting point! Thanks.

BudgetPulse passed this on to me via twitter! great article, I am just starting out with my blog and this whole web 2.0 social networking phenomena and this is a great starting point! Thanks.

BudgetPulse passed this on to me via twitter! great article, I am just starting out with my blog and this whole web 2.0 social networking phenomena and this is a great starting point! Thanks.

BudgetPulse passed this on to me via twitter! great article, I am just starting out with my blog and this whole web 2.0 social networking phenomena and this is a great starting point! Thanks.

BudgetPulse passed this on to me via twitter! great article, I am just starting out with my blog and this whole web 2.0 social networking phenomena and this is a great starting point! Thanks.

BudgetPulse passed this on to me via twitter! great article, I am just starting out with my blog and this whole web 2.0 social networking phenomena and this is a great starting point! Thanks.

I'd actually abandoned Delicious as a source of bookmarking because of all the chaff and confusing bookmarking options. With this blog post I think I will go back (although I am going to start with a new account) and recommit myself to the service. Thanks, Jason

I'd actually abandoned Delicious as a source of bookmarking because of all the chaff and confusing bookmarking options. With this blog post I think I will go back (although I am going to start with a new account) and recommit myself to the service. Thanks, Jason

I'd actually abandoned Delicious as a source of bookmarking because of all the chaff and confusing bookmarking options. With this blog post I think I will go back (although I am going to start with a new account) and recommit myself to the service. Thanks, Jason

I'd actually abandoned Delicious as a source of bookmarking because of all the chaff and confusing bookmarking options. With this blog post I think I will go back (although I am going to start with a new account) and recommit myself to the service. Thanks, Jason

I'd actually abandoned Delicious as a source of bookmarking because of all the chaff and confusing bookmarking options. With this blog post I think I will go back (although I am going to start with a new account) and recommit myself to the service. Thanks, Jason

I'd actually abandoned Delicious as a source of bookmarking because of all the chaff and confusing bookmarking options. With this blog post I think I will go back (although I am going to start with a new account) and recommit myself to the service. Thanks, Jason

I'd actually abandoned Delicious as a source of bookmarking because of all the chaff and confusing bookmarking options. With this blog post I think I will go back (although I am going to start with a new account) and recommit myself to the service. Thanks, Jason

I'd actually abandoned Delicious as a source of bookmarking because of all the chaff and confusing bookmarking options. With this blog post I think I will go back (although I am going to start with a new account) and recommit myself to the service. Thanks, Jason

I'd actually abandoned Delicious as a source of bookmarking because of all the chaff and confusing bookmarking options. With this blog post I think I will go back (although I am going to start with a new account) and recommit myself to the service. Thanks, Jason

I'd actually abandoned Delicious as a source of bookmarking because of all the chaff and confusing bookmarking options. With this blog post I think I will go back (although I am going to start with a new account) and recommit myself to the service. Thanks, Jason

I'd actually abandoned Delicious as a source of bookmarking because of all the chaff and confusing bookmarking options. With this blog post I think I will go back (although I am going to start with a new account) and recommit myself to the service. Thanks, Jason

I'd actually abandoned Delicious as a source of bookmarking because of all the chaff and confusing bookmarking options. With this blog post I think I will go back (although I am going to start with a new account) and recommit myself to the service. Thanks, Jason

I'd actually abandoned Delicious as a source of bookmarking because of all the chaff and confusing bookmarking options. With this blog post I think I will go back (although I am going to start with a new account) and recommit myself to the service. Thanks, Jason

I'd actually abandoned Delicious as a source of bookmarking because of all the chaff and confusing bookmarking options. With this blog post I think I will go back (although I am going to start with a new account) and recommit myself to the service. Thanks, Jason

I'd actually abandoned Delicious as a source of bookmarking because of all the chaff and confusing bookmarking options. With this blog post I think I will go back (although I am going to start with a new account) and recommit myself to the service. Thanks, Jason

I'd actually abandoned Delicious as a source of bookmarking because of all the chaff and confusing bookmarking options. With this blog post I think I will go back (although I am going to start with a new account) and recommit myself to the service. Thanks, Jason

I'd actually abandoned Delicious as a source of bookmarking because of all the chaff and confusing bookmarking options. With this blog post I think I will go back (although I am going to start with a new account) and recommit myself to the service. Thanks, Jason

I'd actually abandoned Delicious as a source of bookmarking because of all the chaff and confusing bookmarking options. With this blog post I think I will go back (although I am going to start with a new account) and recommit myself to the service. Thanks, Jason

I'd actually abandoned Delicious as a source of bookmarking because of all the chaff and confusing bookmarking options. With this blog post I think I will go back (although I am going to start with a new account) and recommit myself to the service. Thanks, Jason

I'd actually abandoned Delicious as a source of bookmarking because of all the chaff and confusing bookmarking options. With this blog post I think I will go back (although I am going to start with a new account) and recommit myself to the service. Thanks, Jason

I'd actually abandoned Delicious as a source of bookmarking because of all the chaff and confusing bookmarking options. With this blog post I think I will go back (although I am going to start with a new account) and recommit myself to the service. Thanks, Jason

I'd actually abandoned Delicious as a source of bookmarking because of all the chaff and confusing bookmarking options. With this blog post I think I will go back (although I am going to start with a new account) and recommit myself to the service. Thanks, Jason

I'd actually abandoned Delicious as a source of bookmarking because of all the chaff and confusing bookmarking options. With this blog post I think I will go back (although I am going to start with a new account) and recommit myself to the service. Thanks, Jason

I'd actually abandoned Delicious as a source of bookmarking because of all the chaff and confusing bookmarking options. With this blog post I think I will go back (although I am going to start with a new account) and recommit myself to the service. Thanks, Jason

I'd actually abandoned Delicious as a source of bookmarking because of all the chaff and confusing bookmarking options. With this blog post I think I will go back (although I am going to start with a new account) and recommit myself to the service. Thanks, Jason

I'd actually abandoned Delicious as a source of bookmarking because of all the chaff and confusing bookmarking options. With this blog post I think I will go back (although I am going to start with a new account) and recommit myself to the service. Thanks, Jason

I'd actually abandoned Delicious as a source of bookmarking because of all the chaff and confusing bookmarking options. With this blog post I think I will go back (although I am going to start with a new account) and recommit myself to the service. Thanks, Jason

I'd actually abandoned Delicious as a source of bookmarking because of all the chaff and confusing bookmarking options. With this blog post I think I will go back (although I am going to start with a new account) and recommit myself to the service. Thanks, Jason

I'd actually abandoned Delicious as a source of bookmarking because of all the chaff and confusing bookmarking options. With this blog post I think I will go back (although I am going to start with a new account) and recommit myself to the service. Thanks, Jason

I'd actually abandoned Delicious as a source of bookmarking because of all the chaff and confusing bookmarking options. With this blog post I think I will go back (although I am going to start with a new account) and recommit myself to the service. Thanks, Jason

I'd actually abandoned Delicious as a source of bookmarking because of all the chaff and confusing bookmarking options. With this blog post I think I will go back (although I am going to start with a new account) and recommit myself to the service. Thanks, Jason

I'd actually abandoned Delicious as a source of bookmarking because of all the chaff and confusing bookmarking options. With this blog post I think I will go back (although I am going to start with a new account) and recommit myself to the service. Thanks, Jason

I'd actually abandoned Delicious as a source of bookmarking because of all the chaff and confusing bookmarking options. With this blog post I think I will go back (although I am going to start with a new account) and recommit myself to the service. Thanks, Jason

Great advice. A few months ago I took a Saturday afternoon and completely organized by Delicious bookmarks — time well spent. Like you, I sometimes get carried away and add too many tags to something I'm bookmarking. When choosing tags I ask myself the question, “If I wanted to find this article again, what word would I be likely to search on?”

Since you can't have spaces in a tag, I combine certain words to make a tag, i.e., socialmedia. But for oth