Kat French

Kat French

Welcome to the jungle, baby.

If you thought this was going to be lot like the last post in the series, but with more expensive tools, sorry to disappoint you. We’ll still be doing a detailed post comparing all the social media monitoring tools available now. But the comments in particular on the last post made me realize that moving from the beginning of a social media monitoring effort to the advanced level is so not really about the tools.

Let me say that again:

Moving from the beginning of a social media monitoring effort to the advanced level is not about the snazzy monitoring tools.

It’s about using the tool between your ears.

I’m a pretty big fan of Avinash Kaushik, an expert in web analytics. In reading his blog over the last year or so, he brings up one concept repeatedly regarding professional development for web analytics pros: the difference between a “reporting squirrel” and an “analysis ninja.” Let me quote the Kaushik:

Know the difference between a Reporting Squirrel and an Analysis Ninja? One is in the business of providing data. One is in the business of providing, to use an old fashioned word, information.

Or to quote another source, “I should think that you Jedi would have more respect for the difference between knowledge and … heh heh heh… wisdom.”

If you walk away from the first two chapters of this Quick ‘n Dirty Guide with the idea that social media monitoring is about collecting links, reviewing content, assessing sentiment, and then providing a big “data puke” to superiors or clients in the form of a report… then you’ve missed the point.

The point of working your way from purely manual monitoring (like we talked about in the first Quick ‘n Dirty Guide post), up to more sophisticated tools, is to give you insights into what people really think and feel about your organization. Not what consumer surveys say. What people say about you when they don’t realize you’re listening. Or when they are hoping you’re listening, but fear you don’t care.

Social media monitoring is the listening part of a conversation.

Like any active listening exercise, after doing it for a while, you should be able to distill what you’ve been hearing. You should be able to pick out the commonly repeated themes. The things that are real emotional hot buttons. The things that are minor-but-constant discordant irritations. You should be able to apply your “tribal knowledge” of your industry to the raw data. 

I’m not talking about some generic “sentiment” score—negative, somewhat positive, neutral. I’m talking about hearing the voice of your people, your customers, as something coherent and understandable and most importantly, ACTIONABLE. I’m talking about pulling the signal out of the noise.

Tools can make this simpler, but ultimately, it’s down to you and your friend Mr. Grey Matter to distill data into insights, and insights into actionable recommendations.

Monitoring is the listening part of a conversation. Which also means it’s completely pointless if you’re not going to respond. Which means this is “fish or cut bait” time.

Don’t jump to conclusions and assume I’m telling you that your efforts are pointless if your organization or client isn’t going to start replying to blog posts and tweeting like John Mayer on steroids. Responding doesn’t necessarily mean “replying.”

If the distilled insights you’re gaining say that your customers have a pain point, addressing that pain point is responding. In fact, it’s a heck of a lot more meaningful way of responding than hiring a PR person to post cheery, upspeak replies to grousing blog posts, tweets and statuses. Is it even better to have a channel, like a blog or a Twitter feed or a Facebook fan page, where you can triumphantly announce your organization’s efforts to combat that pain point? Sure. But that’s the other side of the conversation: social media marketing. (Which I guess will need its own Quick ‘n Dirty Guide soon enough.)

Anyone can throw some snazzy charts and graphs onto a page. And some bosses are really impressed with snazzy charts and graphs—a few times. And the truth is, sometimes the starting point has to be showing some suits that yes, Virginia, an un-ignorable number of people are talking about us on the internet.

But until you can evolve from the social media version of a reporting squirrel into an Insights Ninja…you can probably be replaced by an intern with a really good grasp of cut-and-paste. And unless the higher-ups or clients are going to take action based on the insights you’re pulling from monitoring social media, then you could probably find a better use for your time than chronicling their customers’ joys and frustrations for your own amusement.

So many people are jumping into “social media,” and that’s great. If you want to move from traditional marketing, or even a totally unrelated field, into social media—the barriers to entry are relatively low. This isn’t brain surgery—but it does require you to use your brain.

So here’s where we have to step off of the yellow brick road of step-by-step instructions. This is where you have to figure stuff out on your own. What’s important in all this flood of information? What’s actionable? What next steps would you recommend for the actionable stuff? What’s a format for conveying that to the decision-makers in your organization?

All stuff you’re going to have to determine on your own, bippy.

Like I said, welcome to the jungle.


To check out the first chapter of the Quick ‘n Dirty Guide to Social Media Monitoring, go here.  

For part deux, click here.

Did you enjoy this blog post? If so, then why not:Leave Comment Below | Subscribe To This Blog | Sign Up For Our Newsletter |

About Kat French

Kat French

Kat French is the Digital Operations Manager at CafePress. An exceptional writer both on the web and in other genres, Kat combines creativity with an agile, get-it-done attitude across a broad range of experience in community management, SEO/PPC, social media strategy and program management. She has worked with national brands like Maker's Mark, Daytona Beach Tourism, Optima Batteries and more.

Other posts by

Comments & Reactions

Comments Policy

Comments on Social Media Explorer are open to anyone. However, I will remove any comment that is disrespectful and not in the spirit of intelligent discourse. You are welcome to leave links to content relevant to the conversation, but I reserve the right to remove it if I don't see the relevancy. Be nice, have fun. Fair?

  • http://www.impactwatch.com Hannah Del Porto

    Responding doesn’t necessarily mean “replying.” Ding, ding, ding!

    • KatFrench

      Hannah – Thx for the comment. I think that's often overlooked, isn't it?

  • http://www.impactwatch.com Hannah Del Porto

    Responding doesn’t necessarily mean “replying.” Ding, ding, ding!

  • KatFrench

    Hannah – Thx for the comment. I think that's often overlooked, isn't it?

  • http://www.visibletechnologies.com Mike Spataro

    Hi Kat,

    Another great post. One thing I see as a growing disconnect in this area is that many people and companies think of “monitoring” as something that occurs AFTER the fact, rather than developing the strategies to inform decision-making in advance of corporate and marketing initiatives. Brands that understand this basic concept usually are more successful in this area in the long run.

    Mike Spataro
    Visible Technologies

    • KatFrench

      Mike,

      Glad you liked the post. I think that the kind of companies you are talking about are generally more agile in many ways, not necessarily just in how they view social media monitoring. It's the whole classic “proactive versus reactive” mindset thing.

      Good insight. Thanks for the comment!

  • http://www.visibletechnologies.com Mike Spataro

    Hi Kat,

    Another great post. One thing I see as a growing disconnect in this area is that many people and companies think of “monitoring” as something that occurs AFTER the fact, rather than developing the strategies to inform decision-making in advance of corporate and marketing initiatives. Brands that understand this basic concept usually are more successful in this area in the long run.

    Mike Spataro
    Visible Technologies

  • http://perceptionmetrics.com Brad Snyder

    Kat,

    I really enjoyed the post, I think you hit the nail on the head, “The point of working your way from purely manual monitoring, up to more sophisticated tools, is to give you insights into what people really think and feel about your organization.”

    I work for Perception Metrics, a media monitoring agency in Columbus, OH, and I am amazed when our clients just want us for pretty graphs and don't take the time to dig into the insight we offer into what people are actually saying about them and their competitors.

    All to often people monitor and measure just hoping to have their theories confirmed rather than actually listening to be able to respond.

    Excellent work!

    • KatFrench

      Well, looking at pretty graphs is a way to feel like you're doing something without actually … um… doing anything.

      I think there's just a lot of F.E.A.R out there when it comes to listening to the unfiltered consumer. Ironically, there's just as often nuggets of really good stuff things being said as bad.

      Thanks for the compliment!

  • http://perceptionmetrics.com Brad Snyder

    Kat,

    I really enjoyed the post, I think you hit the nail on the head, “The point of working your way from purely manual monitoring, up to more sophisticated tools, is to give you insights into what people really think and feel about your organization.”

    I work for Perception Metrics, a media monitoring agency in Columbus, OH, and I am amazed when our clients just want us for pretty graphs and don't take the time to dig into the insight we offer into what people are actually saying about them and their competitors.

    All to often people monitor and measure just hoping to have their theories confirmed rather than actually listening to be able to respond.

    Excellent work!

  • Pingback: Internet Marketing, Strategy & Technology Links - Apr 2, 2009 « Sazbean

  • KatFrench

    Mike,

    Glad you liked the post. I think that the kind of companies you are talking about are generally more agile in many ways, not necessarily just in how they view social media monitoring. It's the whole classic “proactive versus reactive” mindset thing.

    Good insight. Thanks for the comment!

  • KatFrench

    Well, looking at pretty graphs is a way to feel like you're doing something without actually … um… doing anything.

    I think there's just a lot of F.E.A.R out there when it comes to listening to the unfiltered consumer. Ironically, there's just as often nuggets of really good stuff things being said as bad.

    Thanks for the compliment!

  • http://www.visibletechnologies.com Mike Spataro

    Hi Kat,

    Another great post. One thing I see as a growing disconnect in this area is that many people and companies think of “monitoring” as something that occurs AFTER the fact, rather than developing the strategies to inform decision-making in advance of corporate and marketing initiatives. Brands that understand this basic concept usually are more successful in this area in the long run.

    Mike Spataro
    Visible Technologies

  • http://perceptionmetrics.com Brad Snyder

    Kat,

    I really enjoyed the post, I think you hit the nail on the head, “The point of working your way from purely manual monitoring, up to more sophisticated tools, is to give you insights into what people really think and feel about your organization.”

    I work for Perception Metrics, a media monitoring agency in Columbus, OH, and I am amazed when our clients just want us for pretty graphs and don't take the time to dig into the insight we offer into what people are actually saying about them and their competitors.

    All to often people monitor and measure just hoping to have their theories confirmed rather than actually listening to be able to respond.

    Excellent work!

  • http://www.internet-bard.com KatFrench

    Mike,

    Glad you liked the post. I think that the kind of companies you are talking about are generally more agile in many ways, not necessarily just in how they view social media monitoring. It's the whole classic “proactive versus reactive” mindset thing.

    Good insight. Thanks for the comment!

  • http://www.internet-bard.com KatFrench

    Well, looking at pretty graphs is a way to feel like you're doing something without actually … um… doing anything.

    I think there's just a lot of F.E.A.R out there when it comes to listening to the unfiltered consumer. Ironically, there's just as often nuggets of really good stuff things being said as bad.

    Thanks for the compliment!

  • Pingback: ImpactWatch » Blog Archive » Top Social Media Monitoring & Measurement Posts of the Week

  • Pingback: Job hunting with social media | Janet Fouts

  • Pingback: email hosting

  • Pingback: madagaskar

  • Pingback: panda

  • Pingback: simply click the following website page